Clarithromycin (Biaxin)-lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) versus lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma

Francesca Gay, S Vincent Rajkumar, Morton Coleman, Shaji Kumar, Tomer Mark, Angela Dispenzieri, Roger Pearse, Morie A Gertz, John Leonard, Martha Q Lacy, Selina Chen-Kiang, Vivek Roy, David S Jayabalan, John A Lust, Thomas E Witzig, Rafael Fonseca, Robert A Kyle, Philip R Greipp, A Keith Stewart, Ruben Niesvizky, Francesca Gay, S Vincent Rajkumar, Morton Coleman, Shaji Kumar, Tomer Mark, Angela Dispenzieri, Roger Pearse, Morie A Gertz, John Leonard, Martha Q Lacy, Selina Chen-Kiang, Vivek Roy, David S Jayabalan, John A Lust, Thomas E Witzig, Rafael Fonseca, Robert A Kyle, Philip R Greipp, A Keith Stewart, Ruben Niesvizky

Abstract

The objective of this case-matched study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of clarithromycin (Biaxin) to lenalidomide/low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) vs. lenalidomide/low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma. Data from 72 patients treated at the New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell Medical Center were retrospectively compared with an equal number of matched pair mates selected among patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who received Rd. Case matching was blinded and was performed according to age, gender, and transplant status. On intention-to-treat analysis, complete response (45.8% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001) and very-good-partial-response or better (73.6% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher with BiRd. Time-to-progression (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.071), and progression-free survival (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.044) were higher with BiRd. There was a trend toward better OS with BiRd (3-year OS: 89.7% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.170). Main grade 3-4 toxicities of BiRd were hematological, in particular thrombocytopenia (23.6% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.012). Infections (16.7% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.218) and dermatological toxicity (12.5% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.129) were higher with Rd. Results of this case-matched analysis suggest that there is significant additive value when clarithromycin is added to Rd. Randomized phase III trials are needed to confirm these results.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: F.G. has received honoraria from Celgene. M.A.G has received honoraria from Celgene, Millenium, Genzyme and Amgen. S.K. has a consultant/advisory relationship and has received research support from Celgene. M.Q.L., A.D., T.E.W, have received research funding/grants from Celgene. T.M. has received research funding from Celgene and honoraria from Celgene and Millenium. J. L consultancy for celgene. R.F. consultancy for Celgene, Medtronic, Genzyme, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Otsuka American Pharmaceutical. R.A.K. has received honoraria from Celgene. P.R.G., has received honoraria from Celgene and Amgen. A.K.S. has a consultant/advisory relationship with Celgene and Millenium and has received research funding from Millenium. R.N. has received honoraria from Celgene, Millenium and Onyx, has a consultant/advisory relation with Celgene, Millenium and Onyx and has received research funding from Celgene. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1. Time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival…
Figure 1. Time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat-population of patients treated with clarithromycin-lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) and lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (Rd)
Panel A: TTP; panel B: PFS; censoring patients at transplant date. Panel C: TTP; panel D: PFS, not censoring patients at transplant date. Median TTP/PFS are provided in the figure (m: months).
Figure 1. Time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival…
Figure 1. Time-to-progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat-population of patients treated with clarithromycin-lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) and lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (Rd)
Panel A: TTP; panel B: PFS; censoring patients at transplant date. Panel C: TTP; panel D: PFS, not censoring patients at transplant date. Median TTP/PFS are provided in the figure (m: months).
Figure 2. Time to next treatment (TTNT)…
Figure 2. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat-population of patients treated with clarithromycin plus lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) and lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd)
Panel A shows TTNT; panel B shows OS. Median TTNT and OS are provided in the figure (m: months)
Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of overall survival…
Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat-population of patients treated with clarithromycin plus lenalidomide-low-dose dexamethasone (BiRd) and lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd)
Panel A shows OS in patients who received transplant; panel B shows OS in patients who did not receive transplant. Median OS is provided in the figure (m: months)

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere