Population-level emergence of bedaquiline and clofazimine resistance-associated variants among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in southern Africa: a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis

Camus Nimmo, James Millard, Lucy van Dorp, Kayleen Brien, Sashen Moodley, Allison Wolf, Alison D Grant, Nesri Padayatchi, Alexander S Pym, François Balloux, Max O'Donnell, Camus Nimmo, James Millard, Lucy van Dorp, Kayleen Brien, Sashen Moodley, Allison Wolf, Alison D Grant, Nesri Padayatchi, Alexander S Pym, François Balloux, Max O'Donnell

Abstract

Background: Bedaquiline and clofazimine are important drugs in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis and are commonly used across southern Africa, although drug susceptibility testing is not routinely performed. In this study, we did a genotypic and phenotypic analysis of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from cohort studies in hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, to identify resistance-associated variants (RAVs) and assess the extent of clofazimine and bedaquiline cross-resistance. We also used a comprehensive dataset of whole-genome sequences to investigate the phylogenetic and geographical distribution of bedaquiline and clofazimine RAVs in southern Africa.

Methods: In this study, we included M tuberculosis isolates reported from the PRAXIS study of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with bedaquiline (King Dinuzulu Hospital, Durban) and three other cohort studies of drug-resistant tuberculosis in other KwaZulu-Natal hospitals, and sequential isolates from six persistently culture-positive patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis at the KwaZulu-Natal provincial referral laboratory. Samples were collected between 2013 and 2019. Microbiological cultures were done as part of all parent studies. We sequenced whole genomes of included isolates and measured bedaquiline and clofazimine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for isolates identified as carrying any Rv0678 variant or previously published atpE, pepQ, and Rv1979c RAVs, which were the subject of the phenotypic study. We combined all whole-genome sequences of M tuberculosis obtained in this study with publicly available sequence data from other tuberculosis studies in southern Africa (defined as the countries of the Southern African Development Community), including isolates with Rv0678 variants identified by screening public genomic databases. We used this extended dataset to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships across lineage 2 and 4 M tuberculosis isolates.

Findings: We sequenced the whole genome of 648 isolates from 385 patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis recruited into cohort studies in KwaZulu-Natal, and 28 isolates from six patients from the KwaZulu-Natal referral laboratory. We identified 30 isolates with Rv0678 RAVs from 16 (4%) of 391 patients. We did not identify any atpE, pepQ, or Rv1979c RAVs. MICs were measured for 21 isolates with Rv0678 RAVs. MICs were above the critical concentration for bedaquiline resistance in nine (43%) of 21 isolates, in the intermediate category in nine (43%) isolates, and within the wild-type range in three (14%) isolates. Clofazimine MICs in genetically wild-type isolates ranged from 0·12-0·5 μg/mL, and in isolates with RAVs from 0·25-4·0 μg/mL. Phylogenetic analysis of the extended dataset including M tuberculosis isolates from southern Africa resolved multiple emergences of Rv0678 variants in lineages 2 and 4, documented two likely nosocomial transmission events, and identified the spread of a possibly bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistant clone in eSwatini. We also identified four patients with pepQ frameshift mutations that may confer resistance.

Interpretation: Bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistance in southern Africa is emerging repeatedly, with evidence of onward transmission largely due to Rv0678 mutations in M tuberculosis. Roll-out of bedaquiline and clofazimine treatment in the setting of limited drug susceptibility testing could allow further spread of resistance. Designing strong regimens would help reduce the emergence of resistance. Drug susceptibility testing is required to identify where resistance does emerge.

Funding: Wellcome Trust, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Phylogeny of southern African lineage 2 (A) and lineage 4 (B) Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains showing bedaquiline resistance profiles Where multiple isolates originate from the same patient, this is indicated with a black line and the number of isolates. *Indicates likely nosocomial transmission (see main text).

References

    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2018. Global tuberculosis report.
    1. Schnippel K, Ndjeka N, Maartens G. Effect of bedaquiline on mortality in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:699–706.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2019. WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2011. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2011 update.
    1. Andries K, Villellas C, Coeck N. Acquired resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to bedaquiline. PLoS One. 2014;9
    1. Hartkoorn RC, Uplekar S, Cole ST. Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:2979–2981.
    1. Almeida D, Ioerger T, Tyagi S. Mutations in pepQ confer low-level resistance to bedaquiline and clofazimine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:4590–4599.
    1. Zhang S, Chen J, Cui P, Shi W, Zhang W, Zhang Y. Identification of novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2507–2510.
    1. Ismail N, Peters RPH, Ismail NA, Omar SV. Clofazimine exposure in vitro selects efflux pump mutants and bedaquiline resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02141–e02218.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2018. Technical report on critical concentrations for TB drug susceptibility testing of medicines used in the treatment of drug-resistant TB.
    1. Nimmo C, Millard J, Brien K. Bedaquiline resistance in drug-resistant tuberculosis HIV co-infected patients. Eur Respir J. 2020;55
    1. Makhado NA, Matabane E, Faccin M. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa undetected by WHO-endorsed commercial tests: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:1350–1359.
    1. Klopper M, Heupink TH, Hill-Cawthorne G. A landscape of genomic alterations at the root of a near-untreatable tuberculosis epidemic. BMC Med. 2020;18:24.
    1. Segala E, Sougakoff W, Nevejans-Chauffour A, Jarlier V, Petrella S. New mutations in the mycobacterial ATP synthase: new insights into the binding of the diarylquinoline TMC207 to the ATP synthase C-ring structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2326–2334.
    1. Zimenkov DV, Nosova EY, Kulagina EV. Examination of bedaquiline- and linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Moscow region. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:1901–1906.
    1. Huitric E, Verhasselt P, Koul A, Andries K, Hoffner S, Andersson DI. Rates and mechanisms of resistance development in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to a novel diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1022–1028.
    1. Xu J, Wang B, Hu M. Primary clofazimine and bedaquiline resistance among isolates from patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00239–e00317.
    1. Somoskovi A, Bruderer V, Hömke R, Bloemberg GV, Böttger EC. A mutation associated with clofazimine and bedaquiline cross-resistance in MDR-TB following bedaquiline treatment. Eur Respir J. 2015;45:554–557.
    1. Ghodousi A, Rizvi AH, Baloch AQ. Acquisition of cross-resistance to bedaquiline and clofazimine following treatment for tuberculosis in Pakistan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00915–e01019.
    1. Andres S, Merker M, Heyckendorf J. Bedaquiline-resistant tuberculosis: dark clouds on the horizon. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:1564–1568.
    1. Villellas C, Coeck N, Meehan CJ. Unexpected high prevalence of resistance-associated Rv0678 variants in MDR-TB patients without documented prior use of clofazimine or bedaquiline. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:684–690.
    1. Yang JS, Kim KJ, Choi H, Lee SH. Delamanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and resistance-related gene mutations in multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Korea. Ann Lab Med. 2018;38:563–568.
    1. Votintseva AA, Bradley P, Pankhurst L. Same-day diagnostic and surveillance data for tuberculosis via whole-genome sequencing of direct respiratory samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:1285–1298.
    1. Bradley P, den Bakker HC, Rocha EPC, McVean G, Iqbal Z. Ultrafast search of all deposited bacterial and viral genomic data. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:152–159.
    1. Dheda K, Limberis JD, Pietersen E. Outcomes, infectiousness, and transmission dynamics of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and home-discharged patients with programmatically incurable tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:269–281.
    1. Cohen KA, Abeel T, Manson McGuire A. Evolution of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis over four decades: whole genome sequencing and dating analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from KwaZulu-Natal. PLoS Med. 2015;12
    1. Streicher EM, Sampson SL, Dheda K. Molecular epidemiological interpretation of the epidemic of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3650–3653.
    1. Nimmo C, Shaw LP, Doyle R. Whole genome sequencing Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum identifies more genetic diversity than sequencing from culture. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:389.
    1. Brynildsrud OB, Pepperell CS, Suffys P. Global expansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 shaped by colonial migration and local adaptation. Sci Adv. 2018;4
    1. Guerra-Assunção JA, Crampin AC, Houben RMGJ. Large-scale whole genome sequencing of M tuberculosis provides insights into transmission in a high prevalence area. eLife. 2015;4
    1. Coll F, McNerney R, Guerra-Assunção JA. A robust SNP barcode for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Nat Commun. 2014;5
    1. Ismail NA, Omar SV, Joseph L. Defining bedaquiline susceptibility, resistance, cross-resistance and associated genetic determinants: a retrospective cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2018;28:136–142.
    1. André E, Goeminne L, Colmant A, Beckert P, Niemann S, Delmee M. Novel rapid PCR for the detection of Ile491Phe rpoB mutation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a rifampicin-resistance-conferring mutation undetected by commercial assays. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:267.e5–267.e7.
    1. Operario DJ, Koeppel AF, Turner SD. Prevalence and extent of heteroresistance by next generation sequencing of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2017;12
    1. Milano A, Pasca MR, Provvedi R. Azole resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by the MmpS5–MmpL5 efflux system. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2009;89:84–90.
    1. Manfredi R, Mastroianni A, Coronado OV, Chiodo F. Fluconazole as prophylaxis against fungal infection in patients with advanced HIV infection. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:64–69.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere