Minimal clinically important difference for comfortable speed as a measure of gait performance in patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation after stroke

Richard W Bohannon, A Williams Andrews, Susan S Glenney, Richard W Bohannon, A Williams Andrews, Susan S Glenney

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference for comfortable gait speed for patients with stroke. [Subjects] Data were analyzed from 35 patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. [Methods] Two characteristics of gait were measured, assistance required and comfortable gait speed. Patients were grouped as either experiencing or not experiencing a decrease of 2 or more levels of assistance required over the course of rehabilitation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the change in gait speed that best differentiated between patients who did and did not experience the requisite decrease in assistance required for gait. [Results] Twenty-one patients decreased 2 or more levels of assistance whereas 14 did not. Walking speed increased significantly more in the group who experienced a decrease in assistance of at least 2 levels. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a change in walking speed of 0.13 m/s best distinguished between patients who did versus did not experience a reduction in assistance required. [Conclusion] An improvement in gait speed of 0.13 m/s or more is clinically important in patients with stroke.

Keywords: Gait speed; Responsiveness; Stroke.

References

    1. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB: Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res, 1988, 11: 181–183
    1. Bohannon RW, Horton MG, Wikholm J: Importance of four variables of walking to patients with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res, 1991, 14: 246–250
    1. Andrews AW, Chinworth SA, Bourassa M, et al. : Update on distance and velocity requirements for community ambulation. J Geriatr Phys Ther, 2010, 33: 128–134
    1. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, et al. : Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA, 2011, 305: 50–58
    1. Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin JF, et al. : Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 56: 1668–1676
    1. McGinn AP, Kaplan RC, Verghese J, et al. : Walking speed and risk of incident ischemic stroke among postmenopausal women. Stroke, 2008, 39: 1233–1239
    1. Lydick E, Epstein RS: Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res, 1993, 2: 221–226
    1. Turner D, Schünemann HJ, Griffith LE, et al. : The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63: 28–36
    1. Tilson JK, Sullivan KJ, Cen SY, et al. : Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther, 2010, 90: 196–208
    1. Fulk GD, Ludwig M, Dunning K, et al. : Estimating clinically important change in gait speed in people with stroke undergoing outpatient rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2011, 35: 82–89
    1. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (version 5.0). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1996. NY.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere