Community intervention to reduce social isolation in older adults in disadvantaged urban areas: study protocol for a mixed methods multi-approach evaluation

María José López, Carolina Lapena, Alba Sánchez, Xavier Continente, Ana Fernández, Evaluation Group of the “Schools of Health for older people”, Alba Sánchez, Anna Fernández, Anna Pérez, Camila Astorga, Carme Cortina, Carolina Lapena, Cristina Rey, Elia Diez, Enriqueta Pujol, Ferran Daban, Gemma Castillo, Iolanda Robles, Lucía Artazcoz, María José López, Mariona Pons, Marc Marí-Dell'Olmo, Montse Petit, Natalia Sagarra, Nuria Calzada, Olga Juárez, Xavier Bartoll, Xavier Continente, María José López, Carolina Lapena, Alba Sánchez, Xavier Continente, Ana Fernández, Evaluation Group of the “Schools of Health for older people”, Alba Sánchez, Anna Fernández, Anna Pérez, Camila Astorga, Carme Cortina, Carolina Lapena, Cristina Rey, Elia Diez, Enriqueta Pujol, Ferran Daban, Gemma Castillo, Iolanda Robles, Lucía Artazcoz, María José López, Mariona Pons, Marc Marí-Dell'Olmo, Montse Petit, Natalia Sagarra, Nuria Calzada, Olga Juárez, Xavier Bartoll, Xavier Continente

Abstract

Background: The proportion of older people has dramatically increased in recent decades. Moreover, social and demographic trends show a global increase of older people at risk of loneliness and lack of social relationships. The objective of this study was to evaluate the process, the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of a planned 22 weekly group sessions called School of Health for Older People to reduce social isolation.

Methods: This is a mixed methods multi-approach evaluation that includes: 1) A qualitative evaluation among coordinators and participants taking part in the intervention, through in depth-interviews and focus groups, respectively. The main topics covered will be positive and negative aspects of the intervention, suggestions for its improvement, opinions on different aspects of the intervention, and perceived benefits; 2) A quantitative quasi-experimental design, comparing a group of individuals taking part in the intervention with another group with similar characteristics not receiving the intervention. Data will be collected at the beginning and at the end of the intervention. Social support will be measured through questions drawn from the Medical Outcomes Study and the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project questionnaires. Psychological morbidity will be measured through Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire, and Health-related Quality of Life will be measured through the EuroQoL questionnaire. Information on visits to the primary care center in the years before and after the intervention will be obtained from the electronic records of the primary care centers; 3) A cost-utility analysis, which will be conducted from a health system (primary care) perspective, including direct costs of the program and the primary care health services used. The effects of the intervention will be measured on quality-adjusted life years.

Discussion: There is an urgent need for studies assessing the effectiveness and the efficiency of potential interventions to reduce social isolation among older persons. The results of this study will help to fill the knowledge gap in this area and might be especially useful for the development of social and public health policies and programs for older people in disadvantaged neighborhoods in urban areas.

Trial registration: NCT03142048 retrospectively registered (April 11, 2017).

Keywords: Aging; Evaluation; Older people; Social isolation.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This protocol was approved by the Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica Parc de Salut Mar (code n° 2015/6500/I). Participants will be informed both verbally and in writing about the aims, methods, procedures and measures performed during the study. They will be also informed about ethics issues such as confidentiality, their right to ask any questions during the study, and their right to withdraw at any time without penalty. To ensure that all participants have received proper information about the study and have agreed to participate, all participants will be asked to sign a written consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of enrolment, allocation and follow-up
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Explanatory model of the potential effects of the “Schools of Health for Older People”

References

    1. Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):658–661. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61461-6.
    1. Idescat. Projeccions de poblacions. 2014. Accesed 15 June 2016.
    1. Domènech-Abella J, Lara E, Rubio-Valera M, Olaya B, Moneta MV, Rico-Uribe LA, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al. Loneliness and depression in the elderly: the role of social network. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017. 10.1007/s00127-017-1339-3.
    1. Scharf T, Philipson C, Smith AE. Poverty and social exclusion: growing older in deprived urban neighbourhoods. In: Holland C, editor. Growing older: quality of life in old age. Buckingham: Open University press; 2004. pp. 81–106.
    1. Savikko N, Routasalo P, Tilvis RS, Strandberg TE, Pitkälä KH. Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2005;41(3):223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.03.002.
    1. Barnes M, Blom A, Cox A, Lessof C. The social exclusion of older people: evidence from the first longitudinal study of ageing (ELSA) London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2006.
    1. Henning-Smith C, Moscovice I, Kozhimannil K. Differences in social isolation and its relationship to health by rurality. J Rural Health. 2019. 10.1111/jrh.12344 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.
    1. Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(15):5797–5801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110.
    1. Tabue Teguo M, Simo-Tabue N, Stoykova R, Meillon C, Cogne M, Amiéva H, Dartigues JF. Feelings of loneliness and living alone as predictors of mortality in the elderly: the PAQUID study. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(8):904–909. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000386.
    1. Dickens AP, Richards SH, Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:647. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647.
    1. Cattan M, White M, Bond J, Learmouth A. Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(01):41–67. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X04002594.
    1. Coll-Planas L, Nyqvist F, Puig T, Urrútia G, Solà I, Monteserín R. Social capital interventions targeting older people and their impact on health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016. 10.1136/jech-2016-208131.
    1. Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health Soc Care Commun. 2016. 10.1111/hsc.12367.
    1. Hagan R, Manktelow R, Taylor BJ, Mallett J. Reducing loneliness amongst older people: a systematic search and narrative review. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):683–693. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2013.875122.
    1. Salut als barris. 2016. . Accesed 12 September 2016.
    1. Sadana R, Blas E, Budhwani S, Koller T, Paraje G. Healthy ageing: raising awareness of inequalities, determinants, and what could be done to improve health equity. Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S178–S193. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw034.
    1. Niedzwiedz CL, Richardson EA, Tunstall H, Shortt NK, Mitchell RJ, Pearce JR. The relationship between wealth and loneliness among older people across Europe: is social participation protective? Prev Med. 2016;91:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.016.
    1. Pla M. El rigor en la evaluación cualitativa. Aten Primaria. 1999;24(5):295–298.
    1. Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;2009. 10.1093/geronb/gbp037.
    1. Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona. [La salut a Barcelona 2015]. 2015http://. Accessed 15 January 2017.
    1. Andrade E, Arce C, Seoane G. Adaptación al español del cuestionario «Perfil de los Estados de Ánimo» en una muestra de deportistas. Psicothema. 2002;14(4):708–713.
    1. Goldberg DP, Oldehinkel T, Ormel J. Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to another. Psychol Med. 1998;28(4):915–921. doi: 10.1017/S0033291798006874.
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–343. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
    1. Sassi F. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DAY calculations. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(5):402–8.
    1. Sacristán JA, Oliva C, Del Llano J, Prieto L, Pinto JL. ¿Qué es una tecnología sanitaria eficiente en España? Gac Sanit. 2002;16(4):334–343. doi: 10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71933-X.
    1. European Commission. 2015. Ageing policy. . Accessed 30 June 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere