Evaluation of the bacterial diversity among and within individual venous leg ulcers using bacterial tag-encoded FLX and titanium amplicon pyrosequencing and metagenomic approaches

Randall D Wolcott, Viktoria Gontcharova, Yan Sun, Scot E Dowd, Randall D Wolcott, Viktoria Gontcharova, Yan Sun, Scot E Dowd

Abstract

Background: Approximately 1 out of every 100 individuals has some form of venous insufficiency, which can lead to chronic venous disease and Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU). There are known underlying pathologies which contribute to the chronic nature of VLU including biofilm phenotype infections.

Results: Using pyrosequencing based approaches we evaluated VLU to characterize their microbial ecology. Results show that VLU infections are polymicrobial with no single bacterium colonizing the wounds. The most ubiquitous and predominant organisms include a previously uncharacterized bacteroidales, various anaerobes, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and Serratia. Topological analysis of VLU show some notable differences in bacterial populations across the surface of the wounds highlighting the importance of sampling techniques during diagnostics. Metagenomics provide a preliminary indication that there may be protozoa, fungi and possibly an undescribed virus associated with these wounds.

Conclusion: The polymicrobial nature of VLU and previous research on diabetic foot ulcers and surgical site infections suggest that the future of therapy for such wounds lies in the core of the logical and proven multiple concurrent strategy approach, which has been termed "biofilm-based wound care" and the use of individualized therapeutics rather than in a single treatment modality.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Double dendogram of major genera in Venous Leg Ulcers. This figure is a double dendogram describing the major genera detected among the 40 VLU samples. The heat map indicates the relative percentage of the given genera within each sample ID with a color legend and scale provided. The distance of the samples based upon weighted pair linkage and Manhattan distance methods with no scaling is provided at the top of the figure along with a distance score. The bacterial genera and the associated clustering are provided along the Y-axis and their associated distance scores indicated. The most determinative genera for clustering, based upon this analysis, are Staphylococcus, Bacteroides, Serratia, and Corynebacterium spp.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual representation of venous leg ulcer sampling strategy. Panels A-D. These figures provide examples of VLU with the transposed sampling locations for the topological bacterial diversity evaluation. The letters (e.g. A, B, C,...) indicate where each sample was gathered from each of these VLU. The detected bacterial diversity for each of these wounds is provided in Tables 3, 4, and 5.

References

    1. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:401–421. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.111633.
    1. Chadwick J, Mann WN. The medical works of Hippocrates. Oxford: Blackwell; 1950.
    1. van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, Mackaay AJ, de Boer EM, Wittens CH. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:563–571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053.
    1. Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.015.
    1. Smith PC. The causes of skin damage and leg ulceration in chronic venous disease. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2006;5:160–168. doi: 10.1177/1534734606292429.
    1. Brem H, Kirsner RS, Falanga V. Protocol for the successful treatment of venous ulcers. Am J Surg. 2004;188:1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00284-8.
    1. Wolcott RD, Ehrlich GD. Biofilms and chronic infections. JAMA. 2008;299:2682–2684. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.22.2682.
    1. Acosta-Martinez V, Dowd SE, Sun Y, Allen V. Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;4:2762–2770.
    1. Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Smith E, Rhoads D. Polymicrobial nature of chronic diabetic foot ulcer biofilm infections determined using bacterial tag encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003326.
    1. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Wolcott RD, Domingo A, Carroll JA. Bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) for microbiome studies: bacterial diversity in the ileum of newly weaned Salmonella-infected pigs. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2008;5:459–472. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0107.
    1. Dowd SE, Callaway TR, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort RG, Edrington TS. Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-125.
    1. Wolcott RD, Dowd SE. A rapid molecular method for characterising bacterial bioburden in chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2008;17:513–516.
    1. Wolcott RD, Gontcharova V, Sun Y, Zischkau AM, Dowd SE. Bacterial diversity in surgical site infections: not just aerobic cocci any more. J Wound Care. 2009;18:317–323.
    1. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD, Dowd SE. Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation. J Wound Care. 2008;17:333–341.
    1. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, Rhoads DD, Wolcott BM, James GA, Wolcott RD. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-43.
    1. Leake JL, Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Zischkau AM. Identification of yeast in chronic wounds using new pathogen-detection technologies. J Wound Care. 2009;18:103–4. 106, 108.
    1. Sheridan RL, Schulz JT, Weber JM, Ryan CM, Pasternack MS, Tompkins RG. Cutaneous herpetic infections complicating burns. Burns. 2000;26:621–624. doi: 10.1016/S0305-4179(00)00025-5.
    1. McGill SN, Cartotto RC. Herpes simplex virus infection in a paediatric burn patient: case report and review. Burns. 2000;26:194–199. doi: 10.1016/S0305-4179(99)00057-1.
    1. Hayden FG, Himel HN, Heggers JP. Herpes virus infections in burn patients. Chest. 1994;106:15S–21S. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.1.15.
    1. Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K, Jensen PO, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, Hoiby N, Givskov M. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x.
    1. Boutli-Kasapidou F, Delli F, Avgoustinaki N, Lambrou N, Tsatsos M, Karakatsanis G. What are biofilms? Evaluation and management in open skin wounds. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:743–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01478.x.
    1. Cochrane CA, Freeman K, Woods E, Welsby S, Percival SL. Biofilm evidence and the microbial diversity of horse wounds. Can J Microbiol. 2009;55:197–202. doi: 10.1139/W08-115.
    1. Davis SC, Ricotti C, Cazzaniga A, Welsh E, Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:23–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00303.x.
    1. Kirketerp-Moller K, Gottrup F. [Bacterial biofilm in chronic wounds] Ugeskr Laeger. 2009;171:1097.
    1. Pupp G, Williams C. What you should know about biofilms and chronic wounds. Podiatry Today. 2009;21:25–27.
    1. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care. 2008;17:145–2. 154.
    1. Mansbridge J. Skin tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19:955–968. doi: 10.1163/156856208784909417.
    1. Mansbridge J. Hypothesis for the formation and maintenance of chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22:158–160. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305464.40424.e2.
    1. Percival SL, Bowler P, Woods EJ. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:52–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00350.x.
    1. Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL. Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care. 2008;17:502–508.
    1. Pollard T. A new vision for wound healing. J Wound Care. 2008;17:141.
    1. Dowd SE, Zaragoza J, Rodriguez JR, Oliver MJ, Payton PR. Windows .NET Network Distributed Basic Local Alignment Search Toolkit (W.ND-BLAST) BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-93.
    1. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–D145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn879.
    1. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Dalevi D, Chen IM, Grechkin Y, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC. IMG/M: a data management and analysis system for metagenomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D534–D538. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm869.
    1. Markowitz VM, Ivanova N, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Korzeniewski F, Lykidis A, Anderson I, Mavromatis K, Kunin V, Garcia MH, Dubchak I, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC. An experimental metagenome data management and analysis system. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:e359–e367. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl217.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere