Attenuation of the ventilatory and heart rate responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia with aging in normal men

R S Kronenberg, C W Drage, R S Kronenberg, C W Drage

Abstract

The response of ventilation and of heart rate to hypoxia and hypercapnia was determined in eight young normal men age 22-30 yr and eight elderly men age 64-73. The elderly men were selected and carefully screened to eliminate the possibility of cardiopulmonary disease. All the subjects were born at low altitude and had no significant prior exposure to hypoxia. The ventilatory response to hypoxia was measured as the exponential slope constant. k, of regression lines relating the logarithm of incremental ventilation to PAo(2) during isocapnic progressive hypoxia. The heart rate response to hypoxia was measured as the percentage change in heart rate between PAo(2) = 100 and PAo(2) = 40 mm Hg. The ventilatory response to hypercapnia was measured as the slope of regression lines relating ventilation to PAco(2) during rebreathing with PAo(2) > 200 mm Hg. The heart rate response to hypercapnia was measured as the percentage change in heart rate between control values at the start of the rebreathing test and PACO(2) = 55 mm Hg. The ventilatory and heart rate responses to both hypoxia and hypercapnia were significantly decreased in the elderly men as compared to the young men. Hypoxic ventilatory drive was decreased by 51+/-6% (mean +/-SEM: P < 0.001) and hypercapnic drive by 41+/-7% (P < 0.025). The percentage change in heart rate produced by hypoxia was 34+/-5% (mean +/-SEM) in the young normals and 12+/-2% in the old normals (P < 0.005). Similar figures for heart rate in response to hypercapnia were 15+/-3% and -1+/-1% for the young and old normal groups (P < 0.001). We conclude that ventilatory and heart rate responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia diminish with age. These alterations in both ventilatory and circulatory controls could make older individuals more vulnerable to hypoxic disease states.

References

    1. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Dec;25(6):664-71
    1. Am J Med. 1961 Feb;30:243-58
    1. J Lab Clin Med. 1958 Jan;51(1):63-71
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Sep;25(3):221-3
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Feb;28(2):244
    1. Physiol Rev. 1962 Jul;42:335-58
    1. J Clin Invest. 1970 Jun;49(6):1061-72
    1. J Clin Invest. 1960 May;39:724-9
    1. N Engl J Med. 1970 Apr 9;282(15):823-9
    1. Respir Physiol. 1969 Apr;6(3):360-74
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1963 Mar;18:284-8
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1969 Aug;27(2):186-90
    1. Circulation. 1963 Sep;28:381-95
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1968 Sep;25(3):217-20
    1. N Engl J Med. 1970 Feb 19;282(8):405-11
    1. Respir Physiol. 1972 Dec;16(3):337-50
    1. Respir Physiol. 1972 Sep;16(1):109-25
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1960 Sep;15:819-25
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1971 Oct;31(4):586-92
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1971 Jan;30(1):91-8
    1. Australas Ann Med. 1967 Feb;16(1):20-32
    1. N Engl J Med. 1971 Nov;285(20):1105-11
    1. J Clin Invest. 1971 Jan;50(1):186-95
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Jan;32(1):44-6
    1. Respir Physiol. 1972 Apr;14(3):296-306
    1. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1957 Jul;42(3):303-19
    1. Clin Sci. 1968 Jun;34(3):559-68
    1. Scand J Respir Dis. 1970;51(3):137-49
    1. Respir Physiol. 1966;1(3):308-34
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1966 May;67(1):10-20
    1. Pflugers Arch. 1958;267(5):460-77

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere