Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies

Susi Lund, Alison Richardson, Carl May, Susi Lund, Alison Richardson, Carl May

Abstract

Context: Advance Care Plans (ACPs) enable patients to discuss and negotiate their preferences for the future including treatment options at the end of life. Their implementation poses significant challenges.

Objective: To investigate barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ACPs, focusing on their workability and integration in clinical practice.

Design: An explanatory systematic review of qualitative implementation studies.

Data sources: Empirical studies that reported interventions designed to support ACP in healthcare. Web of Knowledge, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index and PubMed databases were searched.

Methods: Direct content analysis, using Normalization Process Theory, to identify and characterise relevant components of implementation processes.

Results: 13 papers identified from 166 abstracts were included in the review. Key factors facilitating implementation were: specially prepared staff utilizing a structured approach to interactions around ACPs. Barriers to implementation were competing demands of other work, the emotional and interactional nature of patient-professional interactions around ACPs, problems in sharing decisions and preferences within and between healthcare organizations.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates that doing more of the things that facilitate delivery of ACPs will not reduce the effects of those things that undermine them. Structured tools are only likely to be partially effective and the creation of a specialist cadre of ACP facilitators is unlikely to be a sustainable solution. The findings underscore both the challenge and need to find ways to routinely incorporate ACPs in clinical settings where multiple and competing demands impact on practice. Interventions most likely to meet with success are those that make elements of Advance Care Planning workable within complex and time pressured clinical workflows.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart.
Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart.
Fig 2. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Facilitators.
Fig 2. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Facilitators.
Fig 3. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Barriers.
Fig 3. Operationalizing Advance Care Plans: Barriers.

References

    1. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (2012) Time to interevene? Available: accessed 2014 June 25.
    1. Conroy S, Fade P, Fraser A, Schiff R (2009) Advance care planning: concise evidence-based guidelines. Clinical Medicine 9: 76–79.
    1. Department of Health (2008) End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting high quality care for adults at the end of their life. London: COI.
    1. Lovell A, Yates P (2014) Advance Care Planning in palliative care: A systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008–2012. Palliative Medicine 28: 1026–1035. 10.1177/0269216314531313
    1. Rhee JJ, Zwar NA (2011) How is advance care planning conceptualised in Australia? Findings from key informant interviews. Australian Health Review 35: 197–203. 10.1071/AH10883
    1. May C, Sibley A, Hunt K (2014) The nursing work of hospital-based clinical practice guideline implementation: An explanatory systematic review using Normalisation Process Theory. International Journal of Nursing Studies 51: 289–299. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.019
    1. Mair F, May C, O’Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, et al. (2012) Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 90: 357–364. 10.2471/BLT.11.099424
    1. Watson R, Parr JR, Joyce C, May C, Le Couteur AS (2011) Models of transitional care for young people with complex health needs: a scoping review. Child: Care, Health and Development 37: 780–791. 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01293.x
    1. May C, Finch T (2009) Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology 43: 535–554.
    1. May C (2013) Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science 8.
    1. Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Rix A, Elwyn G (2013) Patchy’coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC). Implementation Science 8.
    1. McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, ODonnell C, Mair F, et al. (2014) A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implementation Science 9.
    1. Gallacher K, May CR, Montori VM, Mair FS (2011) Understanding patients’ experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. Annals of Family Medicine 9: 235–243. 10.1370/afm.1249
    1. Blakeman T, Protheroe J, Chew-Graham C, Rogers A, Kennedy A (2012) Understanding the management of early-stage chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice 62: e233–e242. 10.3399/bjgp12X636056
    1. Schickedanz AD, Schillinger D, Landefeld CS, Knight SJ, Williams BA, et al. (2009) A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients’ self-identified barriers. Journal Of The American Geriatrics Society 57: 31–39. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02093.x
    1. Stein GL, Fineberg IC (2013) Advance Care Planning in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis of Policy, Implementation and the Social Work Role. British Journal of Social Work 43: 233–248.
    1. Bond CJ, Lowton K (2011) Geriatricians’ views of advance decisions and their use in clinical care in England: qualitative study. Age and Ageing 40: 450–456. 10.1093/ageing/afr025
    1. Sabatino CP (2010) The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy. Milbank Quarterly 88: 211–239. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00596.x
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss A (1965) Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.
    1. Pettit SJ, Browne S, Hogg KJ, Connelly DT, Gardner RS, et al. (2012) ICDs in end-stage heart failure. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2: 94–97.
    1. Norlander L, McSteen K (2000) The kitchen table discussion: a creative way to discuss end-of-life issues. Home Healthcare Nurse 18: 532–539.
    1. Storey L, Sherwen E (2013) How to use advance care planning in a care home. Nursing Older People 25: 14–18. 10.7748/nop2013.12.25.10.14.s20
    1. Lynn J, Goldstein NE (2003) Advance care planning for fatal chronic illness: avoiding commonplace errors and unwarranted suffering. Annals Of Internal Medicine 138: 812–818.
    1. Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, Seely D, Sampson M, et al. (2011) Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 718–742. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.013
    1. Hsieh H- F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15: 1277–1288.
    1. Seymour J, Almack K, Kennedy S (2010) Implementing advance care planning: a qualitative study of community nurses’ views and experiences. BMC Palliative Care 9.
    1. Boyd K, Mason B, Kendall M, Barclay S, Chinn D, et al. (2010) Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study. British Journal of General Practice 60.
    1. Bravo G, Arcand M, Blanchette D, Boire-Lavigne AM, Dubois MF, et al. (2012) Promoting advance planning for health care and research among older adults: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Ethics 13.
    1. Matlock DD, Keech TA, McKenzie MB, Bronsert MR, Nowels CT, et al. (2011) Feasibility and acceptability of a decision aid designed for people facing advanced or terminal illness: a pilot randomized trial. Health Expectations 17: 49–59. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00732.x
    1. Baker A, Leak P, Ritchie LD, Lee AJ, Fielding S (2012) Anticipatory care planning and integration: a primary care pilot study aimed at reducing unplanned hospitalisation. British Journal of General Practice 62: e113–120. 10.3399/bjgp12X625175
    1. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W (2010) The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 340: c1345 10.1136/bmj.c1345
    1. Hockley J, Watson J, Oxenham D, Murray SA (2010) The integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools in nursing care homes in the UK: an in-depth evaluation. Palliative Medicine 24: 828–838. 10.1177/0269216310373162
    1. Jeong SYS, Higgins I, McMillan M (2010) The essentials of Advance Care Planning for end-of-life care for older people. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19: 389–397. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03001.x
    1. Jeong SY-S, Higgins I, McMillan M (2007) Advance Care Planning (ACP): The nurse as‘broker’ in residential aged care facilities. Contemporary Nurse 26: 184–195.
    1. Shanley C, Whitmore E, Khoo A, Cartwright C, Walker A, et al. (2009) Understanding how advance care planning is approached in the residential aged care setting: A continuum model of practice as an explanatory device. Australasian Journal on Ageing 28: 211–215. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00383.x
    1. Obolensky L, Clark T, Matthew G, Mercer M (2010) A patient and relative centred evaluation of treatment escalation plans: a replacement for the do-not-resuscitate process. Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 518–520. 10.1136/jme.2009.033977
    1. Schiff R, Shaw R, Raja N, Rajkumar C, Bulpitt CJ (2009) Advance end-of-life healthcare planning in an acute NHS hospital setting; development and evaluation of the Expression of Healthcare Preferences (EHP) document. Age and Ageing 38: 81–85. 10.1093/ageing/afn235
    1. Sampson EL, Jones L, Thune-Boyle IC, Kukkastenvehmas R, King M, et al. (2011) Palliative assessment and advance care planning in severe dementia: an exploratory randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention. Palliative Medicine 25: 197–209. 10.1177/0269216310391691
    1. Simon J, Murray A, Raffin S (2008) Facilitated advance care planning: what is the patient experience? Journal of Palliative Care 24: 256–264.
    1. Elwyn G, Legare F, Edwards A, van der Weijden T, May C (2008) Arduous implementation: does the normalisation process model explain why it is so difficult to embed decision support technologies in routine clinical practice. Implementation Science 3.
    1. Fagerlin A, Schneider CE (2004) Enough: the failure of the living will. Hastings Center Report 34: 30–42.
    1. De Vleminck A, Pardon K, Beernaert K, Deschepper R, Houttekier D, et al. (2014) Barriers to Advance Care Planning in Cancer, Heart Failure and Dementia Patients: A Focus Group Study on General Practitioners’ Views and Experiences. Plos One 9.
    1. Seymour J, Horne G (2013) The withdrawal of the Liverpool Care Pathway in England: implications for clinical practice and policy. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 19: 369–371.
    1. DoH (2013) More care, less pathway: A review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. London: Department of Health (England).
    1. Elwyn G, Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N, Cording E, Thomson R, et al. (2013) Option Grids: shared decision making made easier. Patient Education and Counselling 90: 207–212. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.036

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere