Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains

Abstract

Background: Chronic inversion ankle sprains are common in basketball players. The effect of taping on functional performance is disputed in the literature. Kinesiotaping® (KT®) is a new method that is being used as both a therapeutic and performance enhancement tool. To date, it appears that no study has investigated the effect of ankle KT® on functional performance.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of different types of taping (KT® using Kinesio Tex®, athletic taping) on functional performance in athletes with chronic inversion sprains of the ankle.

Study design: Crossover Study Design

Methods: Fifteen male basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains between the ages of 18 and 22 participated in this study. Functional performance tests (Hopping test by Amanda et al, Single Limb Hurdle Test, Standing Heel Rise test, Vertical Jump Test, The Star Excursion Balance Test [SEBT] and Kinesthetic Ability Trainer [KAT] Test) were used to quantify agility, endurance, balance, and coordination. These tests were conducted four times at one week intervals using varied conditions: placebo tape, without tape, standard athletic tape, and KT®. One-way ANOVA tests were used to examine difference in measurements between conditions. Bonferroni correction was applied to correct for repeated testing.

Results: There were no significant differences among the results obtained using the four conditions for SEBT (anterior p=0.0699; anteromedial p=0.126; medial p=0.550; posteromedial p=0.587; posterior p=0.754; posterolateral p=0.907; lateral p=0.124; anterolateral p=0.963) and the KAT dynamic measurement (p=0.388). Faster performance times were measured with KT® and athletic tape in single limb hurdle test when compared to placebo and non-taped conditions (Athletic taping- placebo taping: p=0.03; athletic taping- non tape p=0.016;KT®- Placebo taping p=0.042; KT®-Non tape p=0.016). In standing heel rise test and vertical jump test, athletic taping led to decreased performance. (Standing heel rise test: Athletic taping- placebo taping p=0.035; athletic taping- non tape p=0.043; athletic tape- KT® p<0.001) (Vertical jump test: Athletic taping- placebo taping p=0.002: athletic taping- non tape p=0.002; KT®- athletic tape p<0.001)

Conclusion: Kinesiotaping® had no negative effects on a battery of functional performance tests and improvements were seen in some functional performance tests.

Clinical relevance: Ankle taping using Kinesio Tex® Tape did not inhibit functional performance.

Keywords: Chronic inversion ankle sprain; Kinesiotaping; functional performance tests.

Figures

Figure 1.

A: Hopping course; B: Subject performing hopping course.

Figure 2.

Single Limb Hurdle Test.

Figure 3.

Standing Heel Rise Test.

Figure 4.

The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

Figure 5.

The SportKAT 3000 device.

Figure 6.

Kinesiotaping application for ankle (note peroneus longus in pink colored tape, peroneus brevis in black colored tape, and anterior tibiofibular ligament in flesh colored tape)

Figure 7.

Athletic taping application for ankle (prewrap, anchors, stirrups [3], heel locks, and closure straps).

Figure 8.

Placebo taping method application.

Figure 9.

Means plot of standing heel rise test results. ENDN = non-taped condition, ENDK = Kinesiotaped condition, ENDA = athletic tape condition, ENDP = placebo condition.

Figure 10.

Means plot of vertical jump test measurement. VJN = non-taped condition, VJK = Kinesiotaped condition, VJA = athletic tape condition, VJP = placebo condition.