The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

Shireen Patel, Athfah Akhtar, Sam Malins, Nicola Wright, Emma Rowley, Emma Young, Stephanie Sampson, Richard Morriss, Shireen Patel, Athfah Akhtar, Sam Malins, Nicola Wright, Emma Rowley, Emma Young, Stephanie Sampson, Richard Morriss

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of mental health disorders continues to rise, with almost 4% of the world population having an anxiety disorder and almost 3.5% having depression in 2017. Despite the high prevalence, only one-third of people with depression or anxiety receive treatment. Over the last decade, the use of digital health interventions (DHIs) has risen rapidly as a means of accessing mental health care and continues to increase. Although there is evidence supporting the effectiveness of DHIs for the treatment of mental health conditions, little is known about what aspects are valued by users and how they might be improved.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise, and synthesize the qualitative literature available on service users' views and experiences regarding the acceptability and usability of DHIs for depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders.

Methods: A systematic search strategy was developed, and searches were run in 7 electronic databases. Qualitative and mixed methods studies published in English were included. A meta-synthesis was used to interpret and synthesize the findings from the included studies.

Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the meta-synthesis, and 3 key themes emerged with descriptive subthemes. The 3 key themes were initial motivations and approaches to DHIs, personalization of treatment, and the value of receiving personal support in DHIs. The meta-synthesis suggests that participants' initial beliefs about DHIs can have an important effect on their engagement with these types of interventions. Personal support was valued very highly as a major component of the success of DHIs. The main reason for this was the way it enabled individual personalization of care.

Conclusions: Findings from the systematic review have implications for the design of future DHIs to improve uptake, retention, and outcomes in DHIs for depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders. DHIs need to be personalized to the specific needs of the individual. Future research should explore whether the findings could be generalized to other health conditions.

Keywords: anxiety; depression; digital health interventions; mobile phone; smartphone; somatoform disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Shireen Patel, Athfah Akhtar, Sam Malins, Nicola Wright, Emma Rowley, Emma Young, Stephanie Sampson, Richard Morriss. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.07.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study identification and selection adapted from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

References

    1. Stansfeld S, Clark C, Bebbington P. Common mental disorders. In: McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha R, editors. Mental Health and Wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Leeds, UK: NHS Digital; 2016. pp. 1–32.
    1. Ritchie H, Roser M. Our World in Data. 2019. [2019-08-15]. Mental Health .
    1. Edwards T, Stern A, Clarke D, Ivbijaro G, Kasney L. The treatment of patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: a review of the literature. Ment Health Fam Med. 2010 Dec;7(4):209–21.
    1. OECD. European Union . Health at a Glance: Europe 2018 State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.
    1. Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Wang PS. Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:137–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091444.
    1. Lamers F, van Oppen P, Comijs HC, Smit JH, Spinhoven P, van Balkom AJ, Nolen WA, Zitman FG, Beekman ATF, Penninx BW. Comorbidity patterns of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large cohort study: the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety (NESDA) J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;72(3):341–8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06176blu.
    1. Morriss R, Patel S, Malins S, Guo B, Higton F, James M, Wu M, Brown P, Boycott N, Kaylor-Hughes C, Morris M, Rowley E, Simpson J, Smart D, Stubley M, Kai J, Tyrer H. Clinical and economic outcomes of remotely delivered cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual for repeat unscheduled care users with severe health anxiety: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2019 Jan 23;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1253-5.
    1. Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, Saul SF. Generating psychotherapy breakthroughs: transtheoretical strategies from population health psychology. Am Psychol. 2019 Nov 25;:-. doi: 10.1037/amp0000568. epub ahead of print.
    1. McManus S, Bebbington P, Jenkins R, Brugha T. Mental Health and Wellbeing in England: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Leeds, UK: NHS Digital; 2014.
    1. Hollis C, Morriss R, Martin J, Amani S, Cotton R, Denis M, Lewis S. Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital revolution. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):263–5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612.
    1. Hollis C, Falconer CJ, Martin JL, Whittington C, Stockton S, Glazebrook C, Davies EB. Annual research review: digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems-a systematic and meta-review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474–503. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12663.
    1. Alkhaldi G, Hamilton FL, Lau R, Webster R, Michie S, Murray E. The effectiveness of technology-based strategies to promote engagement with digital interventions: a systematic review protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Apr 28;4(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3990.
    1. Palmqvist B, Carlbring P, Andersson G. Internet-delivered treatments with or without therapist input: does the therapist factor have implications for efficacy and cost? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2007 Jun;7(3):291–7. doi: 10.1586/14737167.7.3.291.
    1. Zulman DM, Jenchura EC, Cohen DM, Lewis ET, Houston TK, Asch SM. How can ehealth technology address challenges related to multimorbidity? Perspectives from patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1063–70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3222-9.
    1. Cuijpers P, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E, Hollon SD, Andersson G. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;196(3):173–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066001.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided internet-based vs face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):288–95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151.
    1. Waller R, Gilbody S. Barriers to the uptake of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Psychol Med. 2009 May;39(5):705–12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004224.
    1. Twomey C, O'Reilly G, Byrne M, Bury M, White A, Kissane S, McMahon A, Clancy N. A randomized controlled trial of the computerized CBT programme, MoodGYM, for public mental health service users waiting for interventions. Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Nov;53(4):433–50. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12055.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 24;11(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194.
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(4):196–205. doi: 10.1080/16506070903318960.
    1. Kelders SM. University of Twente Research Information. [2020-05-18]. Understanding Adherence to Web-based Interventions .
    1. Kaltenthaler E, Parry G, Beverley C, Ferriter M. Computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;193(3):181–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025981.
    1. Erbe D, Eichert H, Riper H, Ebert DD. Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 15;19(9):e306. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6588.
    1. Etzelmueller A, Radkovsky A, Hannig W, Berking M, Ebert DD. Patient's experience with blended video- and internet based cognitive behavioural therapy service in routine care. Internet Interv. 2018 Jun;12:165–75. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.01.003.
    1. Hollis C, Sampson S, Simons L, Davies Eb, Churchill R, Betton V, Butler D, Chapman K, Easton K, Gronlund Ta, Kabir T, Rawsthorne M, Rye E, Tomlin A. Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind alliance priority setting partnership. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;5(10):845–54. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30296-7.
    1. O'Connor S, Hanlon P, O'Donnell CA, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
    1. Knowles SE, Toms G, Sanders C, Bee P, Lovell K, Rennick-Egglestone S, Coyle D, Kennedy CM, Littlewood E, Kessler D, Gilbody S, Bower P. Qualitative meta-synthesis of user experience of computerised therapy for depression and anxiety. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084323.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    1. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.
    1. Glanville J, Lefebvre C, Wright K. Google Sites. 2019. [2018-08-12]. The InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub-Group Search Filter Resource .
    1. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme: CASP. 2015. [2018-11-15].
    1. Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1988.
    1. Farzanfar R, Frishkopf S, Friedman R, Ludena K. Evaluating an automated mental health care system: making meaning of human–computer interaction. Comput Hum Behav. 2007 May;23(3):1167–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.015.
    1. Purves DG, Dutton J. An exploration of the therapeutic process while using computerised cognitive behaviour therapy. Couns Psychother Res. 2013 Dec;13(4):308–16. doi: 10.1080/14733145.2012.761259.
    1. Lovell K, Bower P, Gellatly J, Byford S, Bee P, McMillan D, Arundel C, Gilbody S, Gega L, Hardy G, Reynolds S, Barkham M, Mottram P, Lidbetter N, Pedley R, Molle J, Peckham E, Knopp-Hoffer J, Price O, Connell J, Heslin M, Foley C, Plummer F, Roberts C. Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of low-intensity interventions in the management of obsessive-compulsive disorder: the obsessive-compulsive treatment efficacy randomised controlled Trial (OCTET) Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(37):1–132. doi: 10.3310/hta21370. doi: 10.3310/hta21370.
    1. Knopp-Hoffer J, Knowles S, Bower P, Lovell K, Bee PE. 'One man's medicine is another man's poison': a qualitative study of user perspectives on low intensity interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 18;16:188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1433-3.
    1. Lillevoll KR, Wilhelmsen M, Kolstrup N, Høifødt RS, Waterloo K, Eisemann M, Risør MB. Patients' experiences of helpfulness in guided internet-based treatment for depression: qualitative study of integrated therapeutic dimensions. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 20;15(6):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2531.
    1. Wilhelmsen M, Lillevoll K, Risør MB, Høifødt R, Johansen M, Waterloo K, Eisemann M, Kolstrup N. Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 7;13:296. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-296.
    1. Kuhn E, Greene C, Hoffman J, Nguyen T, Wald L, Schmidt J, Ramsey KM, Ruzek J. Preliminary evaluation of PTSD Coach, a smartphone app for post-traumatic stress symptoms. Mil Med. 2014 Jan;179(1):12–8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00271.
    1. Advocat J, Lindsay J. Internet-based trials and the creation of health consumers. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(3):485–92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.051.
    1. Beattie A, Shaw A, Kaur S, Kessler D. Primary-care patients' expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2009 Mar;12(1):45–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00531.x.
    1. Clarke J, Proudfoot J, Whitton A, Birch M, Boyd M, Parker G, Manicavasagar V, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Fogarty A. Therapeutic alliance with a fully automated mobile phone and web-based intervention: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Feb 25;3(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/mental.4656.
    1. Fernández-Álvarez J, Díaz-García A, González-Robles A, Baños R, García-Palacios A, Botella C. Dropping out of a transdiagnostic online intervention: a qualitative analysis of client's experiences. Internet Interv. 2017 Dec;10:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.09.001.
    1. Gega L, Smith J, Reynolds S. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for depression by computer vs therapist: patient experiences and therapeutic processes. Psychother Res. 2013;23(2):218–31. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.766941.
    1. Johansson O, Michel T, Andersson G, Paxling B. Experiences of non-adherence to internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy: a qualitative study. Internet Interv. 2015 May;2(2):137–42. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.02.006.
    1. Ly KH, Janni E, Wrede R, Sedem M, Donker T, Carlbring P, Andersson G. Experiences of a guided smartphone-based behavioral activation therapy for depression: a qualitative study. Internet Interv. 2015 Mar;2(1):60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.12.002.
    1. Richards D, Murphy T, Viganó N, Timulak L, Doherty G, Sharry J, Hayes C. Acceptability, satisfaction and perceived efficacy of an internet-delivered treatment for depression. Internet Interv. 2016 Sep;5:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.007.
    1. Walsh A, Richards D. Experiences and engagement with the design features and strategies of an internet-delivered treatment programme for generalised anxiety disorder: a service-based evaluation. Br J Guid Counc. 2016 Feb 28;45(1):16–31. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2016.1153039.
    1. Bendelin N, Hesser H, Dahl J, Carlbring P, Nelson KZ, Andersson G. Experiences of guided Internet-based cognitive-behavioural treatment for depression: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 30;11:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-107.
    1. Donkin L, Glozier N. Motivators and motivations to persist with online psychological interventions: a qualitative study of treatment completers. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 22;14(3):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2100.
    1. Gerhards SA, Abma TA, Arntz A, de Graaf LE, Evers SM, Huibers MJ, Widdershoven GA. Improving adherence and effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy without support for depression: a qualitative study on patient experiences. J Affect Disord. 2011 Mar;129(1-3):117–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.012.
    1. Hind D, O'Cathain A, Cooper CL, Parry GD, Isaac CL, Rose A, Martin L, Sharrack B. The acceptability of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for the treatment of depression in people with chronic physical disease: a qualitative study of people with multiple sclerosis. Psychol Health. 2010 Jul;25(6):699–712. doi: 10.1080/08870440902842739.
    1. Holst A, Nejati S, Björkelund C, Eriksson MC, Hange D, Kivi M, Wikberg C, Petersson E. Patients' experiences of a computerised self-help program for treating depression - a qualitative study of internet mediated cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Mar;35(1):46–53. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288813.
    1. Knowles SE, Lovell K, Bower P, Gilbody S, Littlewood E, Lester H. Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care. BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 30;5(11):e008581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008581.
    1. Pugh N, Hadjistavropoulos H, Hampton A, Bowen A, Williams J. Client experiences of guided internet cognitive behavior therapy for postpartum depression: a qualitative study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015 Apr;18(2):209–19. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0449-0.
    1. Ashford MT, Olander EK, Rowe H, Fisher JR, Ayers S. Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based treatment with telephone support for postpartum women with anxiety: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Apr 20;5(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/mental.9106.
    1. Bauer AM, Iles-Shih M, Ghomi RH, Rue T, Grover T, Kincler N, Miller M, Katon WJ. Acceptability of mhealth augmentation of collaborative care: a mixed methods pilot study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018;51:22–9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.11.010.
    1. NICE: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2019. [2019-09-10]. Depression in Adults: Recognition and Management .

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere