The dynamics of T-cell receptor repertoire diversity following thymus transplantation for DiGeorge anomaly

Stanca M Ciupe, Blythe H Devlin, M Louise Markert, Thomas B Kepler, Stanca M Ciupe, Blythe H Devlin, M Louise Markert, Thomas B Kepler

Abstract

T cell populations are regulated both by signals specific to the T-cell receptor (TCR) and by signals and resources, such as cytokines and space, that act independently of TCR specificity. Although it has been demonstrated that disruption of either of these pathways has a profound effect on T-cell development, we do not yet have an understanding of the dynamical interactions of these pathways in their joint shaping of the T cell repertoire. Complete DiGeorge Anomaly is a developmental abnormality that results in the failure of the thymus to develop, absence of T cells, and profound immune deficiency. After receiving thymic tissue grafts, patients suffering from DiGeorge anomaly develop T cells derived from their own precursors but matured in the donor tissue. We followed three DiGeorge patients after thymus transplantation to utilize the remarkable opportunity these subjects provide to elucidate human T-cell developmental regulation. Our goal is the determination of the respective roles of TCR-specific vs. TCR-nonspecific regulatory signals in the growth of these emerging T-cell populations. During the course of the study, we measured peripheral blood T-cell concentrations, TCRbeta V gene-segment usage and CDR3-length spectratypes over two years or more for each of the subjects. We find, through statistical analysis based on a novel stochastic population-dynamic T-cell model, that the carrying capacity corresponding to TCR-specific resources is approximately 1000-fold larger than that of TCR-nonspecific resources, implying that the size of the peripheral T-cell pool at steady state is determined almost entirely by TCR-nonspecific mechanisms. Nevertheless, the diversity of the TCR repertoire depends crucially on TCR-specific regulation. The estimated strength of this TCR-specific regulation is sufficient to ensure rapid establishment of TCR repertoire diversity in the early phase of T cell population growth, and to maintain TCR repertoire diversity in the face of substantial clonal expansion-induced perturbation from the steady state.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Clone sizes, T cell concentrations…
Figure 1. Clone sizes, T cell concentrations and TCR repertoire diversity.
Clone sizes over time as computed under the model of Eqs.(1,4) (A–C) and the corresponding T cell concentrations (D) and TCR repertoire diversity (E) as a function of time past transplantation. computed under the model of Eqs.(1,4) as a function of time past transplantation. Parameter (see Model section) is varied as indicated while all other parameters are held constant. The higher , the more limiting are TCR-specific resources. “Emigrant number” refers to the order in which clones leave the thymus and enter the periphery; emigrant number 1 is the first clone to arise, etc.
Figure 2. Spectratype data.
Figure 2. Spectratype data.
Raw CD4+ spectratype data (upper panel) for subject 1 on days 70 (left) and 183 (right) post-transplantation. CD4+ TCRBV usage frequency for average over 10 healthy controls (solid bars), and subject 1 (striped bars) on the same two days. The raw spectratype profiles are not represented on a consistent scale. Assays that had no peaks above 500 fluorescent units are routinely excluded from subsequent analysis. These are marked with an asterisk.
Figure 3. Best fit to the data.
Figure 3. Best fit to the data.
Maximum-likelihood fits of the population-dynamic model given by Eqs.(1,4) to patient data. The curves are the trajectories of and , respectively.
Figure 4. Best fit for constant ρ…
Figure 4. Best fit for constant ρ.
Maximum-likelihood fit of data from subject 1 to the population-dynamic model given by Eqs.(1,4). The black curve represents the maximum likelihood solution; the orange and blue curves represent the maximum likelihood solutions subject to a constraint on at the values indicated. The curves are the trajectories of and , respectively.
Figure 5. Sensitivity curves.
Figure 5. Sensitivity curves.
Relative sensitivity trajectories for the model fit to data from subject 1. The left panel shows the relative sensitivity to changes inρ; the right panel shows the relative sensitivity to changes in , the maximum thymic emigration rate. Blue curves give the model solutions forc0+θT; red curves give the model solutions for the (unbiased) TCR repertoire diversity.
Figure 6. Response of the system to…
Figure 6. Response of the system to clonal perturbation.
The system was initialized at steady state, and was subjected to the sudden enlargement of a single randomly chosen clone by 10,000-fold. This clone was held artificially high for 10 days, after which the system was allowed to relax back to steady-state. The artificially enlarged clone consumes TCR-non-specific resources at a rate appropriate to its size. The TCR repertoire diversity is shown in the bottom panel, the T cell concentration is shown in the panel above. varies as indicated. The variability un the steady state diversity is due to the inherent variability in the system rather than to the imposed changes in .

References

    1. Alt F, Oltz E, Young F, Gorman J, Taccioli J, et al. VDJ recombination. Immunol Today. 1992;13:306–314.
    1. Arstila T, Casrouge A, Baron V, Even J, Kanellopoulos J, et al. A direct estimate of the human alphabeta T cell receptor diversity. Science. 1999;286:958–961.
    1. Garcia C, Teyton L, Wilson I. Structural basis of T cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:369–397.
    1. Bousso P, Wahn V, Douagi I, Horneff G, Pannetier C, et al. Diversity, functionality, and stability of the T cell repertoire derived in vivo from a single human T cell precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:274–278.
    1. Jameson S. Maintaining the norm: T-cell homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:547–556.
    1. Stockinger B, Kassiotis G, Bourgeois C. Homeostasis of T cell regulation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2004;16:775–779.
    1. Bourgeois C, Stockinger B. T cell homeostasis in steady state and lymphopenic conditions. Immunol Lett. 2006;107:89–92.
    1. Marleau A, Sarvetnick N. T cell homeostasis in tolerance and immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78:575–584.
    1. Marrack P, Bender J, Hildeman D, Jordan M, Mitchell T, et al. Homeostasis of alpha beta TCR+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:107–111.
    1. Tat J, Ernst B, Kieper W, LeRoy E, Sprent J, et al. Interleukin IL-15 and IL-7 jointly regulate homeostatic proliferation of memory phenotype CD8+ cells but are not required for memory phenotype CD4+ cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195:1523–1532.
    1. Tanchot C, Rosado M, Agenes F, Freitas A, Rocha B. Lymphocyte homeostasis. Semin Immunol. 1997;9:331–337.
    1. Freitas A, Rosado M, Viale A, Grandien A. The role of cellular competition in B cell survival and selection of B cell repertoires. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:1729–1738.
    1. Mahajan V, Leskov I, Chen J. Homeostasis of T cell diversity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2005;2:1–10.
    1. Stockinger B, Barthlott T, Kassiotis G. The concept of space and competition in immune regulation. Immunology. 2004;111:241–247.
    1. Ernst B, Lee D, Chang J, Sprent J, Surh C. The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. Immunity. 1999;11:173–181.
    1. Goldrath A, Bevan M. Low-affinity ligands for the TCR drive proliferation of mature CD8+ T cells in lymphopenic hosts. Immunity. 1999;11:183–190.
    1. Bender J, Mitchell T, Kappler J, Marrack P. CD4+ T cell division in irradiated mice requires peptides distinct from those responsible for thymic selection. J Exp Med. 1999;190:367–374.
    1. Kieper W, Jameson S. Homeostatic expansion and phenotypic conversion of naive T cells in response to self peptide/MHC ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:13306–13311.
    1. Khaled A, Durum S. Lymphocide: cytokines and the control of lymphoid homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:817–830.
    1. Schluns K, Kieper W, Jameson S, Lefrancois L. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:426–432.
    1. Tan J, Dudl E, LeRoy E, Murray R, Sprent J, et al. IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98:8732–8737.
    1. Dummer W, Ernst B, LeRoy E, Lee D, Surh C. Autologous regulation of naive T cell homeostasis within the T cell compartment. J Immunol. 2001;166:2460–2468.
    1. Prlic M, Jameson S. Homeostatic expansion versus antigen-driven proliferation: common ends by different means? Microbes Infect. 2002;4:531–537.
    1. Kirberg J, Berns A, von Boehmer H. Peripheral T cell survival requires continual ligation of the T cell receptor to major histocompatibility complex-encoded molecules. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1269–1275.
    1. Brocker T. Survival of mature CD4 T lymphocytes is dependent on major histocompatibility complex class II-expressing dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186:1223–1232.
    1. Troy A, Shen H. Cutting edge: homeostatic proliferation of peripheral T lymphocytes is regulated by clonal competition. J Immunol. 2003;170:672–676.
    1. Markert M, Devlin B, Chinn I, McCarthy E, Li Y. Factors affecting success of thymus transplantation for complete DiGeorge anomaly. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1729–1736.
    1. Hassan M, Abedi-Valugerdi M, Lefranc G, Hammarstrom L, Smith C. Biological half-life of normal and truncated human IgG3 in scid mice. Eur J Immunol. 1991;21:1319–1322.
    1. Soares M, Borthwick N, Maini M, Janossy G, Salmon M, et al. IL-7-dependent extrathymic expansion of CD45RA+ T cells enables preservation of a naive repertoire. J Immunol. 1998;161:5909–5917.
    1. Thomis D, Berg L. Peripheral expression of Jak3 is required to maintain T lymphocyte function. J Exp Med. 1997;185:197–206.
    1. Vella A, Teague T, Ihle J, Kappler J, Marrack P. Interleukin 4 (IL-4) or IL-7 prevents the death of resting T cells: stat6 is probably not required for the effect of IL-4. J Exp Med. 1997;186:325–330.
    1. Webb L, Foxwelland B, Feldmann M. Putative role for interleukin-7 in the maintenance of the recirculating naive CD4+ T-cell pool. Immunology. 1999;98:400–405.
    1. Goldrath A, Sivakumar P, Glaccum M, Kennedy M, Bevan M, et al. Cytokine requirements for acute and Basal homeostatic proliferation of naive and memory CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195:1515–1522.
    1. Maraskovsky E, Teepe M, Morrissey P, Braddy S, Miller R, et al. Impaired survival and proliferation in IL-7 receptor-deficient peripheral T cells. J Immunol. 1996;157:5315–5323.
    1. Park S, Saijo K, Takahashi T, Osawa M, Arase H, et al. Developmental defects of lymphoid cells in Jak3 kinase-deficient mice. Immunity. 1995;3:771–782.
    1. Kondo M, Takeshita T, Higuchi M, Nakamura M, Sudo T, et al. Functional participation of the IL-2 receptor gamma chain in IL-7 receptor complexes. Science. 1994;263:1453–1454.
    1. Lai S, Molden J, Goldsmith M. Shared gamma(c) subunit within the human interleukin-7 receptor complex. A molecular basis for the pathogenesis of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:169–177.
    1. Roifman C, Zhang J, Chitayat D, Sharfe N. A partial deficiency of interleukin-7R alpha is sufficient to abrogate T-cell development and cause severe combined immunodeficiency. Blood. 2000;96:2803–2807.
    1. Berzins S, Godfrey D, Miller J, Boyd R. A central role for thymic emigrants in peripheral T cell homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:9787–9791.
    1. Thomas R, Landing B, Wells T. Embryologic and other developmental considerations of thirty-eight possible variants of the DiGeorge anomaly. Am J Med Genet. 1987;(Suppl 3):43–66.
    1. Conley M, Beckwith J, Mancer J, Tenckhoff L. The spectrum of the DiGeorge syndrome. J Pediatr. 1979;94:883–890.
    1. Müller W, Peter H, Wilken M, Jüppner H, Kallfelz H, et al. The DiGeorge syndrome. I. Clinical evaluation and course of partial and complete forms of the syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. 1988;147:496–502.
    1. Markert M, Sarzotti M, Ozaki D, Sempowski G, Rhein M, et al. Thymic transplantation in complete DiGeorge syndrome: immunologic and safety evaluations in 12 patients. Blood. 2003;102:1121–1130.
    1. Markert M, Alexieff M, Li J, Sarzotti M, Ozaki D, et al. Postnatal thymus transplantation with immunosuppression as treatment for DiGeorge syndrome. Blood. 2004;104:2574–2581.
    1. Markert M, Devlin B, Alexieff M, Li J, McCarthy E, et al. Review of 54 patients with complete DiGeorge anomaly enrolled in protocols for thymus transplantation: outcome of 44 consecutive transplants. Blood. 2007;109:4539–4547.
    1. Wodarz D. Ecological and evolutionary principles in immunology. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:694–705.
    1. Borghans J, Taams L, Wauben M, De Boer R. Competition for antigenic sites during T cell proliferation: A mathematical interpretation of in vitro data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10782–10787.
    1. Scherer A, Bonhoeffer S. Epitope down-modulation as a mechanism for the coexistence of competing T-cells. J Theor Biol. 2005;233:379–390.
    1. Antia R, Pilyugin S, Ahmed R. Models of immune memory: on the role of cross-reactive stimulation, competition, and homeostasis in maintaining immune memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:14926–14931.
    1. De Boer R, Perelson A. Competitive control of the self-renewing T cell repertoire. Int Immunol. 1997;9:779–790.
    1. De Boer R, Perelson A. T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion. J Theor Biol. 1994;169:375–390.
    1. De Boer R, Freitas A, Perelson A. Resource competition determines selection of B cell repertoires. J Theor Biol. 2001;212:333–343.
    1. Simpson E. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949;163:688.
    1. Pannetier C, Levraud J, Lim A, Even J, Kourilsky P. The immunoscope approach for the analysis of T cell repertoires. The Antigen T Cell Receptor: Selected Protocols and Applications. Georgetown, TX: Oksenberg; 1997.
    1. Kepler T, He M, Tomfohr J, Devlin B, Sarzotti M, et al. Statistical analysis of antigen receptor spectratype data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3394–3400.
    1. Trepel F. Number and distribution of lymphocytes in man. A critical analysis. Klin Wochenschr. 1974;52:511–515.
    1. Robert C, Casella G. Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York, NY: Springer; 2004.
    1. Banks H, Bortz D. A parameter sensitivity methodology in the context of HIV delay equation models. J Math Biol. 2005;50:607–625.
    1. Bortz D, Nelson P. Sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear lumped parameter model of HIV infection dynamics. Bull Math Biol. 2004;66:1009–1026.
    1. Grossman Z, Singer A. Tuning of activation thresholds explains flexibility in the selection and development of T cells in the thymus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14747–14752.
    1. Markert M, Watson T, Kaplan I, Hale L, Haynes B. The human thymic microenvironment during organ culture. Clin Immunol Immunopath. 1997;82:26–36.
    1. Markert M, Li J, Devlin B, Hoehner J, Rice H, et al. Use of allograft biopsies to assess thymopoiesis after thymus transplantation. J Immunol. 2008;180:6354–64.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere