Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy children and adolescents: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial

Bihua Han, Yufei Song, Changgui Li, Wanqi Yang, Qingxia Ma, Zhiwei Jiang, Minjie Li, Xiaojuan Lian, Wenbin Jiao, Lei Wang, Qun Shu, Zhiwei Wu, Yuliang Zhao, Qi Li, Qiang Gao, Bihua Han, Yufei Song, Changgui Li, Wanqi Yang, Qingxia Ma, Zhiwei Jiang, Minjie Li, Xiaojuan Lian, Wenbin Jiao, Lei Wang, Qun Shu, Zhiwei Wu, Yuliang Zhao, Qi Li, Qiang Gao

Abstract

Background: A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 for children and adolescents will play an important role in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a candidate COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2, in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years.

Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial of CoronaVac in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years old at Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Zanhuang (Hebei, China). Individuals with SARS-CoV-2 exposure or infection history were excluded. Vaccine (in 0·5 mL aluminum hydroxide adjuvant) or aluminum hydroxide only (alum only, control) was given by intramuscular injection in two doses (day 0 and day 28). We did a phase 1 trial in 72 participants with an age de-escalation in three groups and dose-escalation in two blocks (1·5 μg or 3·0 μg per injection). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (3:1) by means of block randomisation to receive CoronaVac or alum only. In phase 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) by means of block randomisation to receive either CoronaVac at 1·5 μg or 3·0 μg per dose, or alum only. All participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to group allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after each injection in all participants who received at least one dose. The primary immunogenicity endpoint assessed in the per-protocol population was seroconversion rate of neutralising antibody to live SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days after the second injection. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04551547.

Findings: Between Oct 31, 2020, and Dec 2, 2020, 72 participants were enrolled in phase 1, and between Dec 12, 2020, and Dec 30, 2020, 480 participants were enrolled in phase 2. 550 participants received at least one dose of vaccine or alum only (n=71 for phase 1 and n=479 for phase 2; safety population). In the combined safety profile of phase 1 and phase 2, any adverse reactions within 28 days after injection occurred in 56 (26%) of 219 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 63 (29%) of 217 in the 3·0 μg group, and 27 (24%) of 114 in the alum-only group, without significant difference (p=0·55). Most adverse reactions were mild and moderate in severity. Injection site pain was the most frequently reported event (73 [13%] of 550 participants), occurring in 36 (16%) of 219 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 35 (16%) of 217 in the 3·0 μg group, and two (2%) in the alum-only group. As of June 12, 2021, only one serious adverse event of pneumonia has been reported in the alum-only group, which was considered unrelated to vaccination. In phase 1, seroconversion of neutralising antibody after the second dose was observed in 27 of 27 participants (100·0% [95% CI 87·2-100·0]) in the 1·5 μg group and 26 of 26 participants (100·0% [86·8-100·0]) in the 3·0 μg group, with the geometric mean titres of 55·0 (95% CI 38·9-77·9) and 117·4 (87·8-157·0). In phase 2, seroconversion was seen in 180 of 186 participants (96·8% [93·1-98·8]) in the 1·5 μg group and 180 of 180 participants (100·0% [98·0-100·0]) in the 3·0 μg group, with the geometric mean titres of 86·4 (73·9-101·0) and 142·2 (124·7-162·1). There were no detectable antibody responses in the alum-only groups.

Interpretation: CoronaVac was well tolerated and safe and induced humoral responses in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years. Neutralising antibody titres induced by the 3·0 μg dose were higher than those of the 1·5 μg dose. The results support the use of 3·0 μg dose with a two-immunisation schedule for further studies in children and adolescents.

Funding: The Chinese National Key Research and Development Program and the Beijing Science and Technology Program.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests QG and XL are employees of Sinovac Life Sciences. YS, WY, and LW are employees of Sinovac Biotech. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile *One participant in the 1·5 μg group was excluded from the per-protocol analysis because he received tetanus immunoglobulin at day 14 after the second dose. †One participant in the 3 μg group was excluded from the per-protocol analysis because blood collection after vaccination was outside of the specified time window, and four did not have a blood sample taken 28 days after the second dose. ‡One participant in the alum only group was excluded from the per-protocol analysis because he did not have a blood sample taken 28 days after the second dose.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Antibody titres of neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 induced after two doses of CoronaVac or aluminium hydroxide diluent only in phase 1 and phase 2 trials GMT=geometric mean titre. The error bars indicate the 95% CI of the GMT and the spots indicate the individual antibody titres, with the number above the spots showing the GMT estimate. Only p values between 1·5 μg and 3·0 μg groups after the second vaccination are shown in the figure. All p values for all data are in the appendix (pp 12–13)

References

    1. WHO WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. 2021.
    1. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Coronavirus infections in children including COVID-19: An overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention options in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:355–368.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. May 15, 2020.
    1. Maltezou HC, Magaziotou I, Dedoukou X, et al. Children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: epidemiology, clinical course and viral loads. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e388–e392.
    1. Snape MD, Viner RM. COVID-19 in children and young people. Science. 2020;370:286–288.
    1. Kamidani S, Rostad CA, Anderson EJ. COVID-19 vaccine development: a pediatric perspective. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2021;33:144–151.
    1. Ebina-Shibuya R, Namkoong H, Shibuya Y, Horita N. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with COVID-19: insights from simultaneous familial Kawasaki disease cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:371–373.
    1. Kao CM, Orenstein WA, Anderson EJ. The importance of advancing SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2020
    1. Yang HS, Costa V, Racine-Brzostek SE, et al. Association of age with SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4
    1. WHO Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines. 2021.
    1. Creech CB, Walker SC, Samuels RJ. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. JAMA. 2021;325:1318–1320.
    1. Palacios R, Batista AP, Albuquerque CSN, et al. Efficacy and safety of a COVID-19 inactivated vaccine in healthcare professionals in Brazil: the PROFISCOV study. SSRN. 2021 published online April 14, 2021. (preprint).
    1. Miller NS. COVID-19 vaccines in children: research to guide your news coverage. 2021.
    1. National Institutes of Health Safety and immunogenicity study of inactivated vaccine for prevention of COVID-19. 2020.
    1. Pfizer Pfizer-Biontech announce positive topline results of pivotal COVID-19 vaccine study in adolescents. March 31, 2021.
    1. Gao Q, Bao L, Mao H, et al. Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science. 2020;369:77–81.
    1. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:181–192.
    1. Wu Z, Hu Y, Xu M, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:803–812.
    1. Bueno SM, Abarca K, González PA, et al. Interim report: safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in healthy Chilean adults in a phase 3 clinical trial. medRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.03.31.21254494. published online April 1. (preprint).
    1. Che Y, Liu X, Pu Y, et al. Randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled phase II trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1703.
    1. Ella R, Vadrevu KM, Jogdand H, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: a double-blind, randomised, phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:637–646.
    1. Xia S, Duan K, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2020;324:951–960.
    1. Xia S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:39–51.
    1. Ella R, Reddy S, Jogdand H, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00070-0. published online March 8.
    1. Chine National Medical Products Administration Guidelines for grading standards of adverse events in clinical trials of preventive vaccines.
    1. Li YP, Liang ZL, Gao Q, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel human enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase I clinical trial. Vaccine. 2012;30:3295–3303.
    1. Kang G, Chen H, Ma F, et al. Comparison of the effect of increased hepatitis B vaccine dosage on immunogenicity in healthy children and adults. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12:2312–2316.
    1. Van Der Meeren O, Crasta P, Cheuvart B, De Ridder M. Characterization of an age-response relationship to GSK's recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults: an integrated analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:1726–1729.
    1. Sauer K, Harris T. An effective COVID-19 vaccine needs to engage T cells. Front Immunol. 2020;11
    1. Rha MS, Kim AR, Shin EC. SARS-CoV-2-Specific T cell responses in patients with COVID-19 and unexposed individuals. Immune Netw. 2021;21:e2.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere