Motives and barriers to initiation and sustained exercise adherence in a fitness club setting-A one-year follow-up study

Christina Gjestvang, Frank Abrahamsen, Trine Stensrud, Lene A H Haakstad, Christina Gjestvang, Frank Abrahamsen, Trine Stensrud, Lene A H Haakstad

Abstract

No prospective studies have investigated motives and barriers to exercise in new untrained fitness club members. The aims of the present prospective longitudinal study were to (a) examine proportions reporting regular exercise, non-regular exercise, and exercise dropout; (b) identify motives and barriers to exercise; and (c) compare motives between regular and non-regular exercisers the first year of fitness club membership. New members (n = 250) were followed for 1 year. A questionnaire including demographics, exercise frequency, motives (EMI-2), and barriers (18 common reported barriers) was used, and 184 answered at four time points (onset, and after 3, 6, and 12 months). Participants were categorized into regular exercise: ≥2 sessions/wk or non-regular exercise: ≤1 session/wk, exercise relapse, or dropout. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 63.4%, 59.6%, and 57.2% exercised regularly, whereas 20.1%, 21.1%, and 28.3%, dropped out, respectively. Throughout the follow-up, 37% reported regular exercise. At all time points, motives regarding positive health and strength/endurance were rated highest on a six-point scale. Exercise dropouts rated priority as the greatest barrier. Regular exercisers rated the motives enjoyment (such as "I enjoy the feeling of exerting myself") and challenge (such as "To give me goals to work towards") higher than non-regular exercisers (P = ≤.05). In conclusion, less than half exercised regularly, and most members were motivated by factors such as positive health and physical fitness the first year of fitness club membership. Higher levels of the motives enjoyment and challenge were associated with regular exercise.

Keywords: adherence; barriers; exercise; fitness club members; fitness clubs; motives.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest, including financial, consultant, institutional, and other relationships that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest. The results of the study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.

© 2020 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References

    1. DE Waburton CS, Ivey A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada`s physical activity guidelines for adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):39.
    1. Dishman RK, Buckworth J. Adherence to physical activity In: Morgan WP, ed. Series in health psychology and behavioral medicine. Physical activity and mental health (Reprinted in modified form from W. P. Morgan et al. (Eds.), "Exercise and Mental Health," Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1987). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis; 1997;63–80.
    1. Marcus BH, Dubbert PM, Forsyth LH, et al. Physical activity behavior change: issues in adoption and maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 Suppl):32‐41.
    1. Hawley‐Hague H, Horne M, Skelton DA, Todd C. Review of how we should define (and measure) adherence in studies examining older adults’ participation in exercise classes. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;6:6.
    1. Standage M, Ryan ED. Self‐determination theory and exercise motivation: facilitating self‐regulatory processes to support and maintain health and well‐being In: Roberts GC, Treasure DC, eds. Advances in Motivation in Sport and Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, Inc.; 2012: 233‐270.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):54‐67.
    1. Ingledew DK, Markland D, Ferguson E. Three levels of exercise motivation. Appl Psychol‐Health Well Being. 2009;1(3):336‐355.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(2):143‐164.
    1. Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, Geerts C, Bautmans I. Motivators and barriers for physical activity in the oldest old: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):464‐474.
    1. Burgess E, Hassmen P, Pumpa KL. Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review. Clin Obes. 2017;7(3):123‐135.
    1. Teixeira PJ, Carraca EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self‐determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78.
    1. The IHRSA Global Report . The International Health Racquet & Sportsclub Association. 2019.
    1. Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):659‐680.
    1. Middelkamp J, van Rooijen M, Wolfhagen P, Steenbergen B. The effects of a self‐efficacy intervention on exercise behavior of fitness club members in 52 weeks and long‐term relationships of transtheoretical model constructs. J Sports Sci Med. 2017;16(2):163‐171.
    1. Annesi JJ. Effects of a cognitive behavioral treatment package on exercise attendance and drop out in fitness centers. Eur J Sport Sci. 2003;3(2):1‐16.
    1. Vlachopoulos SP, Neikou E. A prospective study of the relationships of autonomy, competence, and relatedness with exercise attendance, adherence, and dropout. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2007;47(4):475‐482.
    1. Thogersen‐Ntoumani C, Ntoumanis N. The role of self‐determined motivation in the understanding of exercise‐related behaviours, cognitions and physical self‐evaluations. J Sport Sci. 2006;24(4):393‐404.
    1. Reed GR. Adherence to exercise and the transtheoretical model of behavior change In: Bull S, Adherence Issues in Sport and Exercise. ed. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2001:19‐45.
    1. Kathrins BP, Turbow DJ. Motivation of fitness center participants toward resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(9):2483‐2490.
    1. Schwetschenau HM, O'Brien WH, Cunningham CJL, Jex SM. Barriers to physical activity in an on‐site corporate fitness center. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(4):371‐380.
    1. Jekauc D, Volkle M, Wagner MO, Mess F, Reiner M, Renner B. Prediction of attendance at fitness center: a comparison between the theory of planned behavior, the social cognitive theory, and the physical activity maintenance theory. Front Psychol. 2015;6:121.
    1. Stankowski CL, Trauntvein NE, Hall SL. I use the student recreation center, but i would use it more if..: understanding male and female constraints to student recreation center use. RSJ. 2017;41(1):55‐66.
    1. Mullen SP, Whaley DE. Age, gender, and fitness club membership: Factors related to initial involvement and sustained participation. Int J Sport Exercise Psychol. 2010;8(1):24‐35.
    1. Riseth L, Nost TH, Nilsen TIL, Steinsbekk A. Long‐term members' use of fitness centers: a qualitative study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019;11(1).1–9.
    1. Andreasson JJ, Johansson T. Glocalised fitness: the franchising of a physical movement, fitness professionalism and gender. Leisure/Loisir. 2018;42(3):301‐321.
    1. Gjestvang C, Stensrud T, Hansen BH, Kolle E, Haakstad LAH. Are fitness club members likely to meet the current physical activity recommendations? TSM. 2019;3:75‐83.
    1. Gjestvang C, Stensrud T, Haakstad LAH. Are changes in physical fitness, body composition and weight associated with exercise attendance and dropout among fitness club members? Longitudinal prospective study. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;9(4):e027987.
    1. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334‐1359.
    1. Markland D, Ingledew DK. The measurement of exercise motives: factorial validity and invariance across gender of a revised exercise motivations inventory. Br J Health Psychol. 1997;2:361‐376.
    1. Sorensen M, Gill DL. Perceived barriers to physical activity across Norwegian adult age groups, gender and stages of change. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(5):651‐663.
    1. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self‐report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71(2):S1‐S14.
    1. Kulavic K, Hultquist CN, McLester JR. A comparison of motivational factors and barriers to physical activity among traditional versus nontraditional college students. J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(2):60‐66.
    1. Roberts S, Reeves M, Ryrie A. The influence of physical activity, sport and exercise motives among UK‐based university students. J Further Higher Educ. 2015;39(4):598‐607.
    1. Suresh K, Chandrashekara S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(1):7‐13.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge; 1988.
    1. Deelen I, Ettema D, Kamphuis CBM. Sports participation in sport clubs, gyms or public spaces: How users of different sports settings differ in their motivations, goals, and sports frequency. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205198.
    1. Ulseth A. New opportunities ‐ Complex motivations: gender differences in motivation for physical activity in the context of sports clubs and fitness centers. IJAASS. 2008;20(1):44‐66.
    1. Sebire SJ, Standage M, Vansteenkiste M. Examining intrinsic versus extrinsic exercise goals: cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2009;31(2):189‐210.
    1. Herazo‐Beltran Y, Pinillos Y, Vidarte J, Crissien E, Suarez D, Garcia R. Predictors of perceived barriers to physical activity in the general adult population: a cross‐sectional study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(1):44‐50.
    1. Brawley L, Martin KA, Gyurcsik NC. Problems in assessing perceived barriers to exercise: confusing obstacles with attributions and excuses In: Duda Journal , ed. Advances in Sport & Exercise Measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology; 1998: 337‐350.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere