A novel platform for electromagnetic navigated ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS)

Hanne Sorger, Erlend Fagertun Hofstad, Tore Amundsen, Thomas Langø, Håkon Olav Leira, Hanne Sorger, Erlend Fagertun Hofstad, Tore Amundsen, Thomas Langø, Håkon Olav Leira

Abstract

Purpose: Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes is essential for lung cancer staging and distinction between curative and palliative treatment. Precise sampling is crucial. Navigation and multimodal imaging may improve the efficiency of EBUS-TBNA. We demonstrate a novel EBUS-TBNA navigation system in a dedicated airway phantom.

Methods: Using a convex probe EBUS bronchoscope (CP-EBUS) with an integrated sensor for electromagnetic (EM) position tracking, we performed navigated CP-EBUS in a phantom. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and real-time ultrasound (US) images were integrated into a navigation platform for EM navigated bronchoscopy. The coordinates of targets in CT and US volumes were registered in the navigation system, and the position deviation was calculated.

Results: The system visualized all tumor models and displayed their fused CT and US images in correct positions in the navigation system. Navigating the EBUS bronchoscope was fast and easy. Mean error observed between US and CT positions for 11 target lesions (37 measurements) was [Formula: see text] mm, maximum error was 5.9 mm.

Conclusion: The feasibility of our novel navigated CP-EBUS system was successfully demonstrated. An EBUS navigation system is needed to meet future requirements of precise mediastinal lymph node mapping, and provides new opportunities for procedure documentation in EBUS-TBNA.

Keywords: Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS); Electromagnetic navigation; Endobronchial ultrasound; Multimodal image fusion; Navigated EBUS; Navigated ultrasound bronchoscopy.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) guiding real-time transbronchial fine-needle aspiration of a mediastinal lymph node. The sampling needle is visualized sonographically inside the lymph node. Video bronchoscopy is displayed simultaneously (bottom left). The transbronchial needle system emerges from the bronchoscope’s working channel just proximal to the CP-EBUS probe (top right)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic workflow of navigated convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in a fictive lung cancer case. (1) Mediastinal lymph nodes suspect of metastasis are identified in preoperative 2D CT and/or PET–CT images (top left), defining the region of interest for CP-EBUS-guided sampling. If a primary lung tumor is also visible, bronchoscopic sampling of the tumor is also considered; (2) the CT images are preprocessed. The target for sampling (lymph node, tumor) is segmented, and the airway centerline is extracted (bottom left); (3) image-to-patient centerline-based registration is performed in the operation room in the first phase of EBUS (top right, EBUS figure by Terese Winslow, Bronchoscopy, NCI Visuals Online, National Cancer Institute); (4) the level of the target lesion is identified by combined video bronchoscopy and electromagnetic (EM) position tracking of the CP-EBUS bronchoscope (EM navigation, middle right), (5) 2D EBUS (middle right) is used for target confirmation and visualization when the region of interest is approached and will aid the physician in deciding an optimal site for transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) (EM navigated CP-EBUS, bottom right), (6) TBNA from the target lymph node can be performed (bottom right). A cytology smear will reveal whether metastatic lung cancer is present
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prototype convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) bronchoscope with electromagnetic sensor integrated for position tracking
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
OR setup and interface during navigated convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) of a phantom model
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gelatin-based airway phantom used for endoscopy. The course and divisions of the phantom airways are indicated by a red line. All tumor models are assigned numbers according to their location in the phantom mediastinal space, and a letter indicating right (R) or left (L) side
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Transformation between the coordinate systems of the ultrasound image (US), the positions sensor on the bronchoscope (B), the reference sensor (R) on the phantom, and the computer tomography image of the phantom (CT)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Imaging target is moved through the ultrasound (US) image plane. pR,pBiandpUSi describes the coordinate vectors of the image target relative to the sensor on the calibration arm, the sensor on the convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) bronchoscope and the US image plane. BTUS and RTBi are matrices describing the transformation from the US image plane to the sensor on the EBUS probe and from the sensor on the CP-EBUS probe to the sensor on the calibration arm
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
An ultrasound image cutting through the imaging target (plastic sphere) during probe calibration. The location of the sphere center within that image was found by adjusting the position of a virtual circle of the same diameter as the sphere, until its circumference corresponded with the surface of the imaged sphere
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Graphical user interface (GUI) of navigation system during tracked convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in a phantom. A model of the tip of the EBUS bronchoscope and the real-time ultrasound image are displayed. Tumor models are segmented from computed tomography (CT) (green). Axial, coronal, and sagittal views (right side). Yellow crosshairs top center position of ultrasound image. The 3D scene view direction of the patient/phantom is displayed in the top left corner
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Navigated convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) graphical user interface (GUI) example, with ongoing fine-needle puncture of a target lesion. The fine needle is not tracked, but can easily be visualized sonographically
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Manual shift correction to determine the position deviation between computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) volumes. Reconstructed US volumes (gray) were moved manually to the corresponding surface model segmented from CT (red). The optimal alignment was then determined in 2D axial, coronal, and sagittal (ACS) planes. Top row ACS planes before manual correction. Bottom row ACS planes after manual correction
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Position of 3D data acquired during navigated convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) in a phantom model. Black line centerline of airways extracted from computed tomography (CT). Red circles center position of tumor model in CT. Blue crosses center position of tumor model in ultrasound (calculated as center position in CT + deviation found by manual alignment)

References

    1. Shibuya K, Mathers CD, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ. Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. Results for the global burden of disease 2000. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-2-37.
    1. Sagerup CM, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, Helland A, Brustugun OT. Sex-specific trends in lung cancer incidence and survival: a population study of 40,118 cases. Thorax. 2011;66(4):301–307. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.151621.
    1. Strand TE, Rostad H, Moller B, Norstein J. Survival after resection for primary lung cancer: a population based study of 3211 resected patients. Thorax. 2006;61(8):710–715. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.056481.
    1. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM (2013) Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e142S–e165S. doi:10.1378/chest.12-2353
    1. Detterbeck FC, Jantz MA, Wallace M, Vansteenkiste J, SilvestriGA, American College of Chest Physicians (2007) Invasive mediastinal staging of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132(3 Suppl):202S–220S. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1362
    1. Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P, Members of ISC (2009) The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4(5):568–577. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a0d82e
    1. De Leyn P, Dooms C, Kuzdzal J, Lardinois D, Passlick B, Rami-Porta R, Turna A, Schil PV, Venuta F, Waller D, Weder W, Zielinski M. Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2014
    1. Gunluoglu MZ, Melek H, Medetoglu B, Demir A, Kara HV, Dincer SI. The validity of preoperative lymph node staging guidelines of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2011;40(2):287–290.
    1. de Langen AJ, Raijmakers P, Riphagen I, Paul MA, Hoekstra OS. The size of mediastinal lymph nodes and its relation with metastatic involvement: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2006;29(1):26–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.002.
    1. Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Krasnik M, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of lymph nodes in the radiologically and positron emission tomography-normal mediastinum in patients with lung cancer. Chest. 2008;133(4):887–891. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2535.
    1. Adams K, Shah PL, Edmonds L, Lim E. Test performance of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2009;64(9):757–762. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.109868.
    1. Varela-Lema L, Fernandez-Villar A, Ruano-Ravina A. Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(5):1156–1164. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00097908.
    1. Gu P, Zhao YZ, Jiang LY, Zhang W, Xin Y, Han BH. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(8):1389–1396. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.043.
    1. Dong X, Qiu X, Liu Q, Jia J. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(4):1502–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.016.
    1. Chandra S, Nehra M, Agarwal D, Mohan A. Diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy in mediastinal lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Care. 2012;57(3):384–391.
    1. Gomez M, Silvestri GA. Endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(2):180–186. doi: 10.1513/pats.200808-081LC.
    1. Lee HS, Lee GK, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Kim HY, Nam BH, Zo JI, Hwangbo B. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: how many aspirations per target lymph node station? Chest. 2008;134(2):368–374. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2105.
    1. Gildea TR, Mazzone PJ, Karnak D, Meziane M, Mehta AC. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(9):982–989. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200603-344OC.
    1. Lamprecht B, Porsch P, Wegleitner B, Strasser G, Kaiser B, Studnicka M. Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB): increasing diagnostic yield. Respir Med. 2012;106(5):710–715. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.002.
    1. Seijo LM, de Torres JP, Lozano MD, Bastarrika G, Alcaide AB, Lacunza MM, Zulueta JJ. Diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy is highly dependent on the presence of a Bronchus sign on CT imaging: results from a prospective study. Chest. 2010;138(6):1316–1321. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2708.
    1. Makris D, Scherpereel A, Leroy S, Bouchindhomme B, Faivre JB, Remy J, Ramon P, Marquette CH. Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy for small peripheral lung lesions. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(6):1187–1192. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00165306.
    1. Mahajan AK, Patel S, Hogarth DK, Wightman R. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy: an effective and safe approach to diagnose peripheral lung lesions unreachable by conventional bronchoscopy in high-risk patients. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol. 2011;18(2):133–137. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e318216cee6.
    1. Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Herth F. Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(1):36–41. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200612-1866OC.
    1. Reynisson PJ, Leira HO, Hernes TN, Hofstad EF, Scali M, Sorger H, Amundsen T, Lindseth F, Lango T (2014) Navigated bronchoscopy: a technical review. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 3:242–264
    1. Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2012;142(2):385–393. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1764.
    1. Luo X, Mori K (2013) Beyond current guided bronchoscopy: a robust and real-time bronchoscopic ultrasound navigation system. In: Mori K, Sakuma I, Sato Y, Barillot C, Navab N (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2013, vol 8149. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 388–395. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_49
    1. Mori KKT, Luo X, Philipp D, Reichl T, Feuerstein M, Navab N, Kitasaka T. Endobronchial ultrasound endoscope navigation system based on CT–US calibration. Int J CARS. 2011;6(Suppl 1):S164–S174.
    1. Zang X BR, Gilbert CR, Toth JW, Higgins WE (2014) 3D endobronchial ultrasound reconstruction and analysis for multimodal image-guided bronchoscopy. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9040, Medical Imaging 2014: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, 90400X (March 20, 2014) 9040. doi:10.1117/12.2036115
    1. Helferty JP, Sherbondy AJ, Kiraly AP, Higgins WE (2007) Computer-based system for the virtual-endoscopic guidance of bronchoscopy. Comput Vis Image Underst 108(1–2):171–187. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.010
    1. Lango T, Vijayan S, Rethy A, Vapenstad C, Solberg OV, Marvik R, Johnsen G, Hernes TN (2012) Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(4):585–599. doi:10.1007/s11548-011-0656-3
    1. Manstad-Hulaas F, Tangen GA, Dahl T, Hernes TA, Aadahl P. Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(1):70–78. doi: 10.1583/11-3557.1.
    1. Leira HO, Amundsen T, Tangen GA, Bo LE, Manstad-Hulaas F, Lango T. A novel research platform for electromagnetic navigated bronchoscopy using cone beam CT imaging and an animal model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011;20(1):30–41. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.518747.
    1. Leira HO (2012) Development of an image guidance research system for bronchoscopy. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim
    1. Askeland C, Solberg OV, Bakeng JBL, Reinertsen I, Tangen GA, Hofstad EF, Iversen DH, Våpenstad C, Selbekk T, Langø T, Hernes TAN, Olav Leira H, Unsgård G, Lindseth F (2015) CustusX: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11548-015-1292-0
    1. Smistad E, Elster AC, Lindseth F. GPU accelerated segmentation and centerline extraction of tubular structures from medical images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(4):561–575. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0956-x.
    1. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17(3):205–216. doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6.
    1. Yushkevich P, Piven J, Cody H, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2005) User-guided level set segmentation of anatomical structures with ITK-SNAP. Insight J (special issue on ISC/NA-MIC/MICCAI Workshop on Open-Source Software)
    1. Hofstad EF, Sorger H, Leira HO, Amundsen T, Lango T. Automatic registration of CT images to patient during the initial phase of bronchoscopy: a clinical pilot study. Med Phys. 2014;41(4):041903. doi: 10.1118/1.4866884.
    1. Aurora technical specifications. Northern Digital Inc.
    1. Mercier L, Lango T, Lindseth F, Collins DL. A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(4):449–471. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.11.015.
    1. Bø LE, Hofstad EF, Lindseth F, Hernes TA. Versatile robotic probe calibration for position tracking in ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(9):3499–35137. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/9/3499.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere