A Pilot Comparison of a Smartphone App With or Without 2-Way Messaging Among Chronic Pain Patients: Who Benefits From a Pain App?

Robert N Jamison, Dylan C Jurcik, Robert R Edwards, Chuan-Chin Huang, Edgar L Ross, Robert N Jamison, Dylan C Jurcik, Robert R Edwards, Chuan-Chin Huang, Edgar L Ross

Abstract

Objectives: The overall aim of this study was to determine the effect of introducing a smartphone pain application (app), for both Android and iPhone devices that enables chronic pain patients to assess, monitor, and communicate their status to their providers.

Methods: This study recruited 105 chronic pain patients to use a smartphone pain app and half of the patients (N=52) had 2-way messaging available through the app. All patients completed baseline measures and were asked to record their progress every day for 3 months, with the opportunity to continue for 6 months. All participants were supplied a Fitbit to track daily activity. Summary line graphs were posted to each of the patients' electronic medical records and physicians were notified of their patient's progress.

Results: Ninety patients successfully downloaded the pain app. Average age of the participants was 47.1 (range, 18 to 72), 63.8% were female and 32.3% reported multiple pain sites. Adequate validity and reliability was found between the daily assessments and standardized questionnaires (r=0.50) and in repeated daily measures (pain, r=0.69; sleep, r=0.83). The app was found to be easily introduced and well tolerated. Those patients assigned to the 2-way messaging condition on average tended to use the app more and submit more daily assessments (95.6 vs. 71.6 entries), but differences between groups were not significant. Pain-app satisfaction ratings overall were high.

Discussion: This study highlights some of the challenges and benefits in utilizing smartphone apps to manage chronic pain patients, and provides insight into those individuals who might benefit from mHealth technology.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study schema.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Pain app home page with links when scrolled down.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Pain app daily assessments.

References

    1. Vardeh D, Edwards RR, Jamison RN, et al. There’s an app for that: mobile technology is a new advantage in managing chronic pain. Pain: Clin Updates. 2013;21:1–7.
    1. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center Internet Project Omnibus Survey. Washington, DC: Pew; 2014.
    1. Blumenthal S, Somashekar G. Advancing health with information technology in the 21st century. The Huffington Post. 2015. Available at: . Accessed November 21, 2016.
    1. Singh K, Bates D, Drouin K, et al. Developing a Framework for Evaluating the Patient Engagement, Quality, and Safety of Mobile Health Applications. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2016. Available at: . Accessed November 21, 2016.
    1. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Levine J, et al. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain. 2001;91:277–285.
    1. Jamison RN, Gracely RH, Raymond SA, et al. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial utilizing healthy volunteers. Pain. 2002;99:341–347.
    1. Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain. 2004;107:213–219.
    1. Stone AA, Broderick JE. Real-time data collection for pain: appraisal and current status. Pain Med. 2007;8:S85–S93.
    1. Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15:1–39.
    1. Hundert AS, Huguet A, McGrath PJ, et al. Commercially available mobile phone headache diary apps: a systematic review. JMIR Mheath Uhealth. 2014;2:e36., 1–13.
    1. Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Nguyen C, et al. Development and testing of a multidimensional iPhone pain assessment application for adolescents with cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e51., 1–15.
    1. Reynoldson C, Stones C, Allsop M, et al. Assessing the quality and usability of smarphone apps for pain self-management. Pain Med. 2014;15:898–909.
    1. Vega R, Roset R, Castarlenas E, et al. Development and testing of painometer: a smartphone app to assess pain intensity. J Pain. 2014;15:1001–1007.
    1. Rosser BA, Eccleston C. Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:308–312.
    1. Wallace LS, Dhingra LK. A systematic review of smartphone applications for chronic pain available for download in the United States. J Opioid Manag. 2014;10:63–68.
    1. Lallo C, Jibb LA, Rivera J, et al. “There’s a pain app for that”: review of patient-targeted smartphone applications for pain management. Clin J Pain. 2015;31:557–563.
    1. Kristjansdottir OB, Fors EA, Eide E, et al. A smartphone-based intervention with diaries and therapist-feedback to reduce catastrophizing and increase functioning in women with chronic widespread pain: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e72., 1–19.
    1. Vanderboom CE, Vincent A, Luedtke CA, et al. Feasibility of interactive technology for symptom monitoring in patients with fibromyalgia. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013;15:1–8.
    1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:971–979.
    1. Jamison RN. Learning to Master Your Chronic Pain. Sarasota, FL: Professional Research Press; 1996.
    1. Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44:555–558.
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:129–138.
    1. Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1993;17:197–210.
    1. Sullivan MJ, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assessment. 1995;7:524–532.
    1. Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Waite H, et al. Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain. 1998;77:253–260.
    1. Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1987;68:138–141.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand. 1983;37:361–370.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Huag TT, et al. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77.
    1. Jensen MP, Keefe FJ, Lefebvre JC, et al. One- and two-item measures of pain beliefs and coping strategies. Pain. 2003;104:453–469.
    1. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983;17:33–44.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere