Contamination within trials of community-based public health interventions: lessons from the HENRY feasibility study

Elizabeth Stamp, Holly Schofield, Victoria Laurina Roberts, Wendy Burton, Michelle Collinson, June Stevens, Amanda Farrin, Harry Rutter, Maria Bryant, Elizabeth Stamp, Holly Schofield, Victoria Laurina Roberts, Wendy Burton, Michelle Collinson, June Stevens, Amanda Farrin, Harry Rutter, Maria Bryant

Abstract

Introduction: Contamination occurs when participants allocated to trial control arms receive elements of the active intervention. Randomisation at cluster level, rather than individual level, may reduce or eliminate contamination, avoiding the dilution of intervention effectiveness that it may cause. However, cluster randomisation can result in selection bias and may not be feasible to deliver. We explored the extent of contamination in a qualitative study nested within a feasibility study of HENRY (Health, Exercise and Nutrition for the Really Young); a UK community-based child obesity prevention programme. We aimed to determine the nature and impact of contamination to inform a larger planned trial and other trials in community based public health settings.

Method: We invited participants to take part in the nested qualitative study who were already involved in the HENRY feasibility study. Semi-structured interviews/focus groups were conducted with children's centre managers (n=7), children's centre staff (n=15), and parents (n=29). Data were transcribed and analysed using an integrative approach. First, deductively organised using a framework guided by the topic guide and then organised using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Potential for contamination between treatment arms was recognised by all stakeholder groups. Staff within the intervention centres presented the greatest risk of contamination, predominantly because they were often asked to work in other children centre's (including control group centres). 'Sharing of best practice' by staff was reported to be a common and desirable phenomenon within community based settings. Parental sharing of HENRY messages was reported inconsistently; though some parents indicated a high degree of knowledge transfer within their immediate circles.

Conclusions: The extent of contamination identified has influenced the design of a future effectiveness trial of HENRY which will be clustered at the centre level (with geographically distinct clusters). The common practice of knowledge sharing amongst community teams means that this clustering approach is also likely to be most suitable for other trials based within these settings. We provide recommendations (e.g. cluster randomisation, training intervention facilitators on implications of contamination) to help reduce the impact of contamination in public health intervention trials with or without clustering, whilst enabling transfer of knowledge where appropriate.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03333733 registered 6th November 2017.

Keywords: Childhood; Community; Contamination; Obesity; Public health; Randomised control trial.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An overview of the behaviours that can lead to contamination and the associated risk

References

    1. Public Health England . National Child Measurement Programme. 2019.
    1. Sharma V, Coleman S, Nixon J, Sharples L, Hamilton-Shield J, Rutter H, Bryant M. A systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the population prevalence of comorbidities in children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years. Obes Rev. 2019;20(10):1341–1349. doi: 10.1111/obr.12904.
    1. Morandi A, Meyre D, Lobbens S, Kleinman K, Kaakinen M, Rifas-Shiman SL, Vatin V, Gaget S, Pouta A, Hartikainen A-L, et al. Estimation of newborn risk for child or adolescent obesity: lessons from longitudinal birth cohorts. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049919.
    1. England PH. Health matters: obesity and the food environment. 2017.
    1. HM Government . Childhood obesity: a plan for action. 2018.
    1. Association LG . Commissioning for better health outcomes. 2016.
    1. Brown T, Moore THM, Hooper L, Gao Y, Zayegh A, Ijaz S, Elwenspoek M, Foxen SC, Magee L, O’Malley C, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:CD001871.
    1. Keogh-Brown MR, Bachmann MO, Shepstone L, Hewitt C, Howe AC, Ramsay CR, Song F, Miles J, Torgeson D, Miles S, et al. Contamination in trials of educational interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(43):1–128. doi: 10.3310/hta11430.
    1. Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ. 2001;322(7282):355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.355.
    1. Doyle O, Hickey C. The challenges of contamination in evaluations of childhood interventions. Evaluation. 2013;19(2):183–194. doi: 10.1177/1356389013482610.
    1. Magill N, Graves H, de Zoysa N, Winkley K, Amiel S, Shuttlewood E, Landau S, Ismail K. Assessing treatment fidelity and contamination in a cluster randomised controlled trial of motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy skills in type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0742-5.
    1. Magill N, Knight R, McCrone P, Ismail K, Landau S. A scoping review of the problems and solutions associated with contamination in trials of complex interventions in mental health. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):4–4. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0646-z.
    1. Diaz-Ordaz K, Froud R, Sheehan B, Eldridge S. A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-127.
    1. Hahn S, Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J. Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-10.
    1. Bland JM. Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-21.
    1. Ehlers D, Fanning J, Salerno E, Kramer A, McAuley E. Contamination by an active control condition in a randomized exercise trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164246.
    1. Bryant M, Burton W, Collinson M, Hartley S, Tubeuf S, Roberts K, Sondaal A, Farrin A. Cluster randomised controlled feasibility study of HENRY: a community-based intervention aimed at reducing obesity rates in preschool children. Pilot Feasib Stud. 2018;4:59. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0309-1.
    1. Rudolf MCJ, Hunt C, George J, Hajibagheri K, Blair M. HENRY: development, pilot and long-term evaluation of a programme to help practitioners work more effectively with parents of babies and pre-school children to prevent childhood obesity. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(6):850–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01116.x.
    1. Willis TA, George J, Hunt C, Roberts KPJ, Evans CEL, Brown RE, Rudolf MCJ. Combating child obesity: impact of HENRY on parenting and family lifestyle. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9(5):339–350. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00183.x.
    1. Hunt C, Rudolph M. Tackling childhood obesity with HENRY: a handbook for community practitioners. London: Unite/Community Practitioners’ and Health Visitors’ Association; 2008.
    1. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
    1. Braun V, Clark V. Successful qualitative research. London: a practical guide for beginners: SAGE; 2012.
    1. Côté J, Salmela J, Baria A, Russell S. Organizing and interpreting unstructured qualitative data. Sport Psychol. 1993;7:127–137. doi: 10.1123/tsp.7.2.127.
    1. QSR International (1999) NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software [Software]. Available from . Accessed 2019
    1. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–1772. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
    1. Sparkes A, Smith B. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health. From Process to Product. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2014.
    1. Nobles J, Christensen A, Butler M, Radley D, Pickering K, Saunders J, Weir C, Sahota P, Gately P. Understanding how local authorities in England address obesity: a wider determinants of health perspective. Health Policy. 2019;123(10):998–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.016.
    1. Hemming K, Eldridge S, Forbes G, Weijer C, Taljaard M. How to design efficient cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2017;358:j3064. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3064.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere