Efficacy of a hybrid assistive limb in post-stroke hemiplegic patients: a preliminary report
Shinichiro Maeshima, Aiko Osawa, Daisuke Nishio, Yoshitake Hirano, Koji Takeda, Hiroshi Kigawa, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Shinichiro Maeshima, Aiko Osawa, Daisuke Nishio, Yoshitake Hirano, Koji Takeda, Hiroshi Kigawa, Yoshiyuki Sankai
Abstract
Background: Robotic devices are expected to be widely used in various applications including support for the independent mobility of the elderly with muscle weakness and people with impaired motor function as well as support for nursing care that involves heavy laborious work. We evaluated the effects of a hybrid assistive limb robot suit on the gait of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
Methods: The study group comprised 16 stroke patients with severe hemiplegia. All patients underwent gait training. Four patients required assistance, and 12 needed supervision while walking. The stride length, walking speed and physiological cost index on wearing the hybrid assistive limb suit and a knee-ankle-foot orthosis were compared.
Results: The hybrid assistive limb suit increased the stride length and walking speed in 4 of 16 patients. The patients whose walking speed decreased on wearing the hybrid assistive limb suit either had not received sufficient gait training or had an established gait pattern with a knee-ankle-foot orthosis using a quad cane. The physiological cost index increased after wearing the hybrid assistive limb suit in 12 patients, but removal of the suit led to a decrease in the physiological cost index values to equivalent levels prior to the use of the suit.
Conclusions: Although the hybrid assistive limb suit is not useful for all hemiplegic patients, it may increase the walking speed and affect the walking ability. Further investigation would clarify its indication for the possibility of gait training.
Figures
References
- Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation. Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54:1938–1944.
- Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:22–35. doi: 10.1310/RYT5-62N4-CTVX-8JTE.
- Banala SK, Kim SH, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Robot assisted gait training with active leg exosketon (ALEX) IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009;17:2–8.
- Kawamoto H, Sankai Y. Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Adv Robot. 2005;19:717–734. doi: 10.1163/1568553054455103.
- Lee S, Sankai Y. Virtual impedance adjustment in unconstrained motion for an exoskeletal robot assisting the lower limb. Adv Robot. 2005;19:773–795. doi: 10.1163/1568553054455095.
- Shimizu H, Kawarai T, Saji N, Tadano M, Kita Y, Tabuchi M. et -evaluation of clinical features and risk factors of acute ischemic stroke in Japanese longevity society. Kobe J Med Sci. 2009;55:E132–E139.
- Muraki I, Yamagishi K, Ito Y, Fujieda T, Ishikawa Y, Miyagawa Y. et al.Caregiver burden for impaired elderly japanese with prevalent stroke and dementia under long-term care insurance system. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25:234–240. doi: 10.1159/000113861.
- Kawamoto H, Hayashi T, Sakurai T, Eguchi K, Sankai Y. Development of single leg version of HAL for hemiplegia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:5038–5043.
- Maeshima S, Ueyoshi A, Osawa A, Ishida K, Kunimoto K, Shimamoto Y, Matsumoto T. et al.Mobility and muscle strength contralateral to hemiplegia from stroke: Benefit of self-training with family support. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:456–462.
- Yamanaka T, Akashi K, Ishii M. Stroke rehabilitation and long leg brace. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:6–8. doi: 10.1310/G8RF-312L-G6FW-A8JW.
- Finley FR, Cody KA. Locomotive characteristics of urban pedestrians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1970;51:423–426.
- MacGregor J. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on ambulatory monitoring. Stoot FD, Raftery EB, Goulding L, editor. London: Academic Press; 1979. The objective measurement of physical performance with long term ambulatory physiological surveillance equipment (LAPSE) pp. 29–39.
- Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6:75–87. doi: 10.1109/86.662623.
- Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, Krebs HI, Rogers JM, Goyal KS. et al.Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:723–736. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0048.
- Hachisuka K. Robot-aided training in rehabilitation. Brain Nerve. 2010;62:133–140.
- Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke. A randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008;39:1786–1792. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779.
Source: PubMed