Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy for concerned significant others of people with problem gambling: study protocol for a randomised wait-list controlled trial

Kristoffer Magnusson, Anders Nilsson, Clara Hellner Gumpert, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring, Kristoffer Magnusson, Anders Nilsson, Clara Hellner Gumpert, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring

Abstract

Introduction: About 2.3% of the adult population in Sweden are considered to suffer from problem gambling, and it is estimated that only 5% of those seek treatment. Problem gambling can have devastating effects on the economy, health and relationship, both for the individual who gambles and their concerned significant other (CSO). No empirically supported treatment exists for the CSOs of people with problem gambling. Consequently, the aim of this study is to develop and evaluate a programme aimed at CSOs of treatment-refusing problem gamblers. The programme will be based on principles from cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing. To benefit as many CSOs as possible, the programme will be delivered via the internet with therapist support via encrypted email and short weekly conversations via telephone.

Methods and analysis: This will be a randomised wait-list controlled internet-delivered treatment trial. A CBT programme for the CSOs of people with problem gambling will be developed and evaluated. The participants will work through nine modules over 10 weeks in a secure online environment, and receive support via secure emails and over the telephone. A total of 150 CSOs over 18 years of age will be included. Measures will be taken at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes concern gambling-related harm. Secondary outcomes include the treatment entry of the individual who gambles, the CSO's levels of depression, anxiety, as well as relationship satisfaction and quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been approved by the regional ethics board of Stockholm, Sweden. This study will add to the body of knowledge on how to protect CSOs from gambling-related harm, and how to motivate treatment-refusing individuals to seek professional help for problem gambling.

Trial registration number: NCT02250586.

Keywords: cognitive behavior therapy; concerned significant other; pathological gambling; randomized controlled trial.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

References

    1. Statens folkhälsoinstitut. Spel om pengar och spelproblem i Sverige 2008/2009. Huvudresultat från SWELOGS befolkningsstudie. Statens folkhälsoinstitut: Östersund, 2010.
    1. Svensson J, Romild U, Shepherdson E. The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden—a 1 year follow-up study. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1087 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087
    1. Kalischuk RG, Nowatzki N, Cardwell K et al. . Problem gambling and its impact on families: a literature review. Int Gambl Stud 2006;6:31–60. 10.1080/14459790600644176
    1. Patford J. For worse, for poorer and in ill health: how women experience, understand and respond to a partner's gambling problems. Int J Ment Health Addict 2009;7:177–89. 10.1007/s11469-008-9173-1
    1. Shaw M, Forbush K, Schlinder J et al. . The effect of pathological gambling on families, marriages, and children. CNS Spectr 2007;12:615–22. 10.1017/S1092852900021416
    1. Steinberg MA. Couples treatment issues for recovering male compulsive gamblers and their partners. J Gambl Stud 1993;9:153–67. 10.1007/BF01014865
    1. Downs C, Woolrych R. Gambling and debt: the hidden impacts on family and work life. Community Work Fam 2010;13:311–28. 10.1080/13668803.2010.488096
    1. Volberg RA, Abbott MW, Ronnberg S et al. . Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:250–6. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00336.x
    1. Lorenz VC, Shuttlesworth DE. The impact of pathological gambling on the spouse of the gambler. J Community Psychol 1983;11:67–76. 10.1002/1520-6629(198301)11:1<67::AID-JCOP2290110107>;2-O
    1. Mathews M, Volberg R. Impact of problem gambling on financial, emotional and social well-being of Singaporean families. Int Gambl Stud 2012;13:1–14.10.1080/14459795.2012.731422
    1. Lesieur H. Costs and treatment of pathological gambling. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 1998;556:153–71. 10.1177/0002716298556001012
    1. Lorenz VC, Yaffee RA. Pathological gambling: psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the spouse. J Gambl Stud 1988;4:13–26. 10.1007/BF01043525
    1. Dickson-Swift Va, James EL, Kippen S. The experience of living with a problem gambler: spouses and partners speak out. J Gambl Issues 2005;13:1–22.
    1. Wenzel HG, Oren A, Bakken IJ. Gambling problems in the family–a stratified probability sample study of prevalence and reported consequences. BMC Public Health 2008;8:412 10.1186/1471-2458-8-412
    1. Krishnan M, Orford J. Gambling and the family: from the stress support perspective. Int Gambl Stud 2002;2(1):61–83.
    1. Clarke D, Abbott M, DeSouza R et al. . An overview of help seeking by problem gamblers and their families including barriers to and relevance of services. Int J Ment Health Addict 2007;5:292–306. 10.1007/s11469-007-9063-y
    1. Gomes K, Pascual-Leone A. Primed for change: facilitating factors in problem gambling treatment. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:1–17. 10.1007/s10899-008-9111-y
    1. Hing N, Tiyce M, Holdsworth L et al. . All in the family: help-seeking by significant others of problem gamblers. Int J Ment Health Addict 2013;11:396–408. 10.1007/s11469-012-9423-0
    1. Ingle PJ, Marotta J, McMillan G et al. . Significant others and gambling treatment outcomes. J Gambl Stud 2008;24:381–92. 10.1007/s10899-008-9092-x
    1. Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Makarchuk K et al. . Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gambl Stud 2007;23:215–30. 10.1007/s10899-006-9052-2
    1. McComb JL, Lee BK, Sprenkle DH. Conceptualizing and treating problem gambling as a family issue. J Marital Fam Ther 2009;35:415–31. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00146.x
    1. Petry N, Weiss L. Social support is associated with gambling treatment outcomes in pathological gamblers. Am J Addict 2009;18:402–8. 10.3109/10550490903077861
    1. Pulford J, Bellringer M, Abbott M et al. . Reasons for seeking help for a gambling problem: the experiences of gamblers who have sought specialist assistance and the perceptions of those who have not. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:19–32. 10.1007/s10899-008-9112-x
    1. Bellringer M, Pulford J, Abbott M et al. . Problem gambling-barriers to help-seeking behaviours, final Report Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, 2008.
    1. Hodgins DC, el-Guebaly N. Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction 2000;95:777–89. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95577713.x
    1. Copello AG, Velleman RDB, Templeton LJ. Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005;24:369–85. 10.1080/09595230500302356
    1. Fernandez AC, Begley Ea, Marlatt GA. Family and peer interventions for adults: past approaches and future directions. Psychol Addict Behav 2006;20:207–13. 10.1037/0893-164X.20.2.207
    1. Meis La, Griffin JM, Greer N et al. . Couple and family involvement in adult mental health treatment: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:275–86. 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.003
    1. Makarchuk K, Hodgins DC, Peden N. Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. Addict Disord Their Treat 2002;1:126–34. 10.1097/00132576-200211000-00003
    1. Rychtarik RG, McGillicuddy NB. Preliminary evaluation of a coping skills training program for those with a pathological-gambling partner. J Gambl Stud 2006;22:165–78. 10.1007/s10899-006-9008-6
    1. Statens folkhälsoinstitut . Årsrapport Stödlinjen 2013. Östersund; 2014. Available from: .
    1. Rodda SN, Lubman DI, Dowling NA et al. . Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling. Asian J Gambl Issues Public Health 2013;3:1–11. 10.1186/2195-3007-3-12
    1. Dowling NA, Rodda SN, Lubman DI et al. . The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addict behav 2014;39:1253–7. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.011
    1. McMillen J, Marshall D, Murphy L et al. . Help-seeking by problem gamblers, friends and families: a focus on gender and cultural groups. Centre for Gambling Research (CGR), ANU, 2004.
    1. Valentine G, Hughes K. Ripples in a pond: the disclosure to, and management of, problem Internet gambling with/in the family. Community Work Fam 2010;13:273–90. 10.1080/13668803.2010.488107
    1. Andersson G. Using the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behav Res Ther 2009;47:175–80. 10.1016/j.brat.2009.01.010
    1. Cuijpers P, Donker T, van Straten A et al. . Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychol Med 2010;40:1943–57. 10.1017/S0033291710000772
    1. Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P et al. . Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatr 2014;13:288–95. 10.1002/wps.20151
    1. Carlbring P, Smit F. Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76:1090 10.1037/a0013603
    1. Holtgraves T. Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index. J Gambl Stud 2009;25:105–20. 10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7
    1. Rollnick S, Miller WR. What is motivational interviewing? Behav Cogn Psychother 1995;23:325–34. 10.1017/S135246580001643X
    1. Carlbring P, Degerman N, Jonsson J et al. . Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cogn Behav Ther 2012;41:321–34. 10.1080/16506073.2012.689323
    1. Jacobson NS, Christensen A, Prince SE et al. . Integrative behavioral couple therapy: an acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:351–5. 10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.351
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick SP. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. The Guilford Press, 2002.
    1. Hodgins DC, Shead NW, Makarchuk K. Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007;195:65–71. 10.1097/01.nmd.0000252382.47434.a6
    1. Abbott M, Bellringer M, Hodgins DC et al. . Effectiveness of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: a randomised controlled trial. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2012.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JW et al. . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB et al. . The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010;32: 345–59. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006
    1. Titov N, Dear BF, McMillan D et al. . Psychometric comparison of the PHQ-9 and BDI-II for measuring response during treatment of depression. Cogn Behav Ther 2011;40:126–36. 10.1080/16506073.2010.550059
    1. Dear BF, Titov N, Sunderland M et al. . Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 2011;40:216–27. 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138
    1. Rask M, Malm D, Kristofferzon ML et al. . Validity and reliability of a Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): a pilot study. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs 2010;20:16–21.
    1. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299–310. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00
    1. Datainspektionen. Personal Data Act (1998:204). Stockholm: Datainspektionen, 1998.
    1. Silvia PJ, Kwapil TR, Walsh MA et al. . Planned missing-data designs in experience-sampling research: monte Carlo simulations of efficient designs for assessing within-person constructs. Behav Res Methods 2014;46:41–54. 10.3758/s13428-013-0353-y
    1. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    1. Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    1. Chou CP, Yang D, Pentz MA et al. . Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study. Comput Stat Data Anal 2004;46:213–25. 10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00149-X
    1. Henderson R, Diggle P, Dobson A. Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. Biostatistics 2000;1:465–80. 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.465
    1. Horton NJ, Kim E, Saitz R. A cautionary note regarding count models of alcohol consumption in randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:9 10.1186/1471-2288-7-9
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670–4. 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
    1. Keselman H, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2001;54:1–20. 10.1348/000711001159357
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD. Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychol Methods 1997;2:64–78. 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.64
    1. Ard MC, Edland SD. Power calculations for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;26(Suppl 3):369–77. 10.3233/JAD-2011-0062
    1. Lachin JM. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1981;2:93–113. 10.1016/0197-2456(81)90001-5
    1. Chambless DL, Baker MJ, Baucom DH et al. . Update on empirically validated therapies, II. Clin Psychol 1998;51:3–16.
    1. Proudfoot J, Klein B, Barak A et al. . Establishing guidelines for executing and reporting internet intervention research. Cogn Behav Ther 2011;40:82–97. 10.1080/16506073.2011.573807
    1. Hodgins DC, Makarchuk K. Trusting problem gamblers: reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychol Addict Behav 2003;17:244 10.1037/0893-164X.17.3.244

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere