Effects of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures on postoperative function compared to a standard lateral approach (HemiSPAIRE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Anna Price, Susan Ball, Shelley Rhodes, Robert Wickins, Elizabeth Gordon, Alex Aylward, Emma Cockcroft, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Roy Powell, John Timperley, John Charity, Anna Price, Susan Ball, Shelley Rhodes, Robert Wickins, Elizabeth Gordon, Alex Aylward, Emma Cockcroft, Sarah Morgan-Trimmer, Roy Powell, John Timperley, John Charity

Abstract

Introduction: Currently National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines in the UK suggest that surgeons performing partial hip replacements (hemiarthroplasty) should consider using the lateral approach. Alternatively, a newer, modified posterior approach using a muscle sparing technique named 'Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus' (SPAIRE) can be used leaving the major muscles intact. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the SPAIRE approach to the standard lateral approach, to determine if it allows patients to mobilise better and experience improved function after surgery.

Methods and analysis: HemiSPAIRE is a two-arm, assessor-blinded, definitive pragmatic RCT with nested pilot and qualitative studies. Two hundred and twenty-eight participants with displaced intracapsular fractures requiring hip hemiarthroplasty will be individually randomised 1:1 to either the SPAIRE, or control (standard lateral approach) surgical procedure. Outcomes will be assessed at postoperative day 3 (POD3) and 120 (POD120). The primary outcome measure will be level of function and mobility using the Oxford Hip Score at POD120. Secondary outcomes include: De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), Cumulated Ambulatory Score and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at POD3; DEMMI, NPRS and EQ-5D-5L at POD120, complications, acute and total length of hospital stay, and mortality. Primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. Participant experiences of the impact of surgery and recovery period will be examined via up to 20 semi-structured telephone interviews.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been approved by Yorkshire and the Humber-Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee. Recruitment commenced in November 2019. Findings will be disseminated via research articles in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at conferences, public involvement events, patient groups and media releases. A summary of the trial findings will be shared with participants at the end of the study.

Trial registration number: NCT04095611.

Keywords: clinical trials; hip; orthopaedic & trauma surgery; surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AP, SB, EG, JT, AA, RW, RP, SM-T and EC have nothing to disclose. SR reports grants from NIHR RFPB, during the conduct of the study. JC reports grants from NIHR, during the conduct of the study.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of trial design, with anticipated numbers of participants. SPAIRE, Save Piriformis and Internus, Repairing Externus.

References

    1. RCP . Royal College of physicians. National hip fracture database annual report 2017 London, 2016.
    1. McGilton KS, Davis AM, Naglie G, et al. . Evaluation of patient-centered rehabilitation model targeting older persons with a hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 2013;13:136. 10.1186/1471-2318-13-136
    1. RCP . Royal College of physicians. National hip fracture database annual report 2016 London, 2016. Available:
    1. NICE . Hip fracture: the management of hip fracture in adults (CG124), 2011. Available:
    1. Kristensen TB, Vinje T, Havelin LI. Posterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: 20,908 patients from the Norwegian hip fracture register. Acta Orthop 2017;88:29–34.
    1. Han S-K, Kim Y-S, Kang S-H. Treatment of femoral neck fractures with bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a modified minimally invasive posterior approach in patients with neurological disorders. Orthopedics 2012;35:e635–40. 10.3928/01477447-20120426-15
    1. Vaarbakken K, Steen H, Samuelsen G, et al. . Lengths of the external hip rotators in mobilized cadavers indicate the quadriceps coxa as a primary abductor and extensor of the flexed hip. Clin Biomech 2014;29:794–802. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.05.011
    1. Fullam J, Theodosi PG, Charity J, et al. . A scoping review comparing two common surgical approaches to the hip for hemiarthroplasty. BMC Surg 2019;19:32. 10.1186/s12893-019-0493-9
    1. Parker MJ. Lateral versus posterior approach for insertion of hemiarthroplasties for hip fractures: a randomised trial of 216 patients. Injury 2015;46:1023–7. 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.020
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. QSR International Pty Ltd . NVivo qualitative data analysis software, version 12, 2018.
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, et al. . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:185–90. 10.1302/0301-620X.78B2.0780185
    1. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. . The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1010–4. 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424
    1. Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. . Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:73–9. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. . Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010;8:18. 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
    1. de Morton NA, Harding KE, Taylor NF, et al. . Validity of the de Morton mobility index (DEMMI) for measuring the mobility of patients with hip fracture during rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:325–33. 10.3109/09638288.2012.705220
    1. Statutory instrument no 1031 . Statutory instrument no 1031. medicines for human use (clinical trials) regulations 2004. London: The Stationery Office, 2004.
    1. NHS Health Research Authority . UK policy framework for health and social care research. London: Health Research Authority, 2017.
    1. Statutory Instrument . Mental capacity act 2005. London: The Stationery Office, 2005.
    1. Statutory Instrument . Data protection act 2018. London: The Stationery Office, 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere