Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness

Rochelle Ackerley, Ida Carlsson, Henric Wester, Håkan Olausson, Helena Backlund Wasling, Rochelle Ackerley, Ida Carlsson, Henric Wester, Håkan Olausson, Helena Backlund Wasling

Abstract

Human skin is innervated with different tactile afferents, which are found at varying densities over the body. We investigate how the relationships between tactile pleasantness, sensitivity and discrimination differ across the skin. Tactile pleasantness was assessed by stroking a soft brush over the skin, using five velocities (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 cm s(-1)), known to differentiate hedonic touch, and pleasantness ratings were gained. The ratings velocity-profile is known to correlate with firing in unmyelinated C-tactile (CT) afferents. Tactile sensitivity thresholds were determined using monofilament force detection and the tactile discrimination level was obtained in the direction discrimination of a moving probe; both tasks readily activate myelinated touch receptors. Perceptions were measured over five skin sites: forehead, arm, palm, thigh and shin. The assessment of tactile pleasantness over the skin resulted in a preference for the middle velocities (1-10 cm s(-1)), where higher ratings were gained compared to the slowest and fastest velocities. This preference in tactile pleasantness was found across all the skin sites, apart from at the palm, where no decrease in pleasantness for the faster stroking velocities was seen. We find that tactile sensitivity and discrimination vary across the skin, where the forehead and palm show increased acuity. Tactile sensitivity and discrimination levels also correlated significantly, although the tactile acuity did not relate to the perceived pleasantness of touch. Tactile pleasantness varied in a subtle way across skin sites, where the middle velocities were always rated as the most pleasant, but the ratings at hairy skin sites were more receptive to changes in stroking velocity. We postulate that although the mechanoreceptive afferent physiology may be different over the skin, the perception of pleasant touch can be interpreted using all of the available incoming somatosensory information in combination with central processing.

Keywords: C-tactile; affective touch; body map; human; psychophysics; sensory afferent; somatosensory; tactile.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagrammatic representations of the stroking stimuli and the tactile direction discrimination probe. (A) The rotary tactile stimulator, where a soft brush was stroked at precise velocities across each skin site and psychophysical ratings of pleasantness were gained. (B) The probe used for the tactile direction discrimination task, which was moved across the skin over specified distances.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean scores for pleasantness ratings at different stroking velocities over the skin sites. A significant effect of stroking velocity overall the skin sites. The slowest (0.3 cm s−1) and fastest (30 cm s−1) were rated as less pleasant compared to the middle velocities (1–10 cm s−1) for the (A) forehead, (B) arm, (C) palm, (D) thigh, and (E) shin. The ratings scale was from −10 to +10. Error bars correspond to ±S.E.M.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of skin site for pleasantness ratings at higher stroking velocities. There was a significant main effect of skin site at (A) 10 cm s−1 and (B) 30 cm s−1 stroking velocities; for comparison of different skin sites at these separate velocities, the other skin sites were compared to the palm (* indicates significant differences, p < 0.05 to the palm ratings). The ratings scale was from −10 to +10. The upper and lower edges of the boxes relate to the ± 1 S.E.M. around the mean, and the lines are the upper and lower bound 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The median values for and tactile sensitivity and discrimination over the skin. Medians are shown for (A) force indentation threshold using monofilaments, and (B) tactile direction discrimination level for each of the five skin sites from the main experiment. Significant effects of skin site were found for both tests; see Results for individual differences between sites. Error bars indicate inter-quartile confidence intervals for the ordinal data; note that there are no inter-quartile confidence bars for the results in Figure 4A forehead, arm and palm and in Figure 4B forehead, due to there being no variation in the ranked middle 50% of ordinal scores.

References

    1. Ackerley R., Hassan E., Curran A., Wessberg J., Olausson H., McGlone F. (2012a). An fMRI study on cortical responses during active self-touch and passive touch from others. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:51 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00051
    1. Ackerley R., Eriksson E., Wessberg J. (2012b). Ultra-late EEG potential evoked by preferential activation of unmyelinated tactile afferents in human hairy skin. Neurosci. Lett. 535, 62–66 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.004
    1. Ackerley R., Saar K., McGlone F., Backlund Wasling H. (2013). Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous skin and hairy skin. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:34 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034
    1. Bell-Krotoski J., Weinstein S., Weinstein C. (1993). Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization and vibration. J. Hand Ther. 6, 114–123 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80292-4
    1. Bensmaia S. J. (2008). Tactile intensity and population codes. Behav. Brain Res. 190, 165–173 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.044
    1. Björnsdotter M., Löken L., Olausson H., Vallbo A., Wessberg J. (2009). Somatotopic organization of gentle touch processing in the posterior insular cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 9314–9320 10.1523/jneurosci.0400-09.2009
    1. Dexter F., Chestnut D. H. (1995). Analysis of statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups. Anesthesiology 82, 896–902 10.1097/00000542-199504000-00012
    1. Durup H. (1967). Recherche de plans d’expériences temporels à transitions exhaustive simples ou multiples. Bull. C.E.R.P 16, 21–39
    1. Edin B. (2001). Cutaneous afferents provide information about knee joint movements in humans. J. Physiol. 531, 289–297 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0289j.x
    1. Essick G. K., James A., McGlone F. P. (1999). Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch. Neuroreport 10, 2083–2087 10.1097/00001756-199907130-00017
    1. Essick G. K., McGlone F., Dancer C., Fabricant D., Ragin Y., Phillips N., et al. (2010). Quantitative assessment of pleasant touch. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 192–203 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.02.003
    1. Field A. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
    1. Francis S., Rolls E. T., Bowtell R., McGlone F., O’Doherty J., Browning A., et al. (1999). The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas. Neuroreport 10, 453–459 10.1097/00001756-199902250-00003
    1. Gazzola V., Spezio M. L., Etzel J. A., Castelli F., Adolphs R., Keysers C. (2012). Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 109, E1657–E1666 10.1073/pnas.1113211109
    1. Gordon I., Voos A. C., Bennett R. H., Bolling D. Z., Pelphrey K. A., Kaiser M. D. (2013). Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 914–922 10.1002/hbm.21480
    1. Guest S., Dessirier J. M., Mehrabyan A., McGlone F., Essick G., Gescheider G., et al. (2011). The development and validation of sensory and emotional scales of touch perception. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 531–550 10.3758/s13414-010-0037-y
    1. Hsiao S. (2008). Central mechanisms of tactile shape perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 418–424 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.001
    1. Hua Q. P., Zeng X. Z., Liu J. Y., Wang J. Y., Guo J. Y., Luo F. (2008). Dynamic changes in brain activations and functional connectivity during affectively different tactile stimuli. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 28, 57–70 10.1007/s10571-007-9228-z
    1. Johansson R. S. (1978). Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J. Physiol. 281, 101–125
    1. Johansson R. S., Flanagan J. R. (2009). Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 345–359 10.1038/nrn2621
    1. Johansson R. S., Trulsson M., Olsson K. A., Westberg K. G. (1988). Mechanoreceptor activity from the human face and oral mucosa. Exp. Brain Res. 72, 204–208 10.1007/bf00248518
    1. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. (1979a). Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand. J. Physiol. 297, 405–422
    1. Johansson R. S., Vallbo A. B. (1979b). Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. 286, 283–300
    1. Johansson R. S., Westling G. (1987). Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp. Brain Res. 66, 141–154 10.1007/bf00236210
    1. Johnson K. O. (2001). The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 455–461 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00234-8
    1. Johnson K. O., Hsiao S. S. (1992). Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 227–250 10.1146/annurev.neuro.15.1.227
    1. Kida T., Shinohara K. (2013). Gentle touch activates the anterior prefrontal cortex: an NIRS study. Neurosci. Res. 76, 76–82 10.1016/j.neures.2013.03.006
    1. Klöcker A., Arnould C., Penta M., Thonnard J. L. (2012). Rasch-built measure of pleasant touch through active fingertip exploration. Front. Neurorobot. 6:5 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00005
    1. Li L., Rutlin M., Abraira V. E., Cassidy C., Kus L., Gong S., et al. (2011). The functional organization of cutaneous low-threshold mechanosensory neurons. Cell 147, 1615–1627 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.027
    1. Liu Q., Vrontou S., Rice F. L., Zylka M. J., Dong X., Anderson D. J. (2007). Molecular genetic visualization of a rare subset of unmyelinated sensory neurons that may detect gentle touch. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 946–948 10.1038/nn1937
    1. Löken L. S., Evert M., Wessberg J. (2011). Pleasantness of touch in human glabrous and hairy skin: order effects on affective ratings. Brain Res. 1417, 9–15 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.08.011
    1. Löken L. S., Wessberg J., Morrison I., McGlone F., Olausson H. (2009). Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 547–548 10.1038/nn.2312
    1. Löken L., Wessberg J., Olausson H. W. (2007). Unmyelinated tactile (CT) afferents are present in the human peroneal and radial nerves. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 872.2
    1. Maxwell C. (1978). Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 6, 15–24 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb01676.x
    1. McCabe C., Rolls E. T., Bilderbeck A., McGlone F. (2008). Cognitive influences on the affective representation of touch and the sight of touch in the human brain. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 3, 97–108 10.1093/scan/nsn005
    1. McGlone F., Olausson H., Boyle J. A., Jones-Gotman M., Dancer C., Guest S., et al. (2012). Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 1782–1788 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08092.x
    1. McGlone F., Vallbo A. B., Olausson H., Loken L., Wessberg J. (2007). Discriminative touch and emotional touch. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 173–183 10.1037/cjep2007019
    1. Morrison I., Björnsdotter M., Olausson H. (2011a). Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds. J. Neurosci. 31, 9554–9562 10.1523/jneurosci.0397-11.2011
    1. Morrison I., Löken L. S., Minde J., Wessberg J., Perini I., Nennesmo I., et al. (2011b). Reduced C-afferent fibre density affects perceived pleasantness and empathy for touch. Brain 134, 1116–1126 10.1093/brain/awr011
    1. Nordin M. (1990). Low-threshold mechanoreceptive and nociceptive units with unmyelinated (C) fibres in the human supraorbital nerve. J. Physiol. 426, 229–240
    1. Norrsell U., Eliasson B., Frizell M., Wallin B. G., Wesslau C., Olausson H. (2001). Tactile directional sensibility and diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 24, 1496–1502 10.1002/mus.1174
    1. Olausson H. W., Cole J., Vallbo A., McGlone F., Elam M., Krämer H. H., et al. (2008). Unmyelinated tactile afferents have opposite effects on insular and somatosensory cortical processing. Neurosci. Lett. 436, 128–132 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.015
    1. Olausson H., Lamarre Y., Backlund H., Morin C., Wallin B. G., Starck G., et al. (2002). Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 900–904 10.1038/nn896
    1. Olausson H., Norrsell U., Göthner K., Wallin B. G. (1997). Directional sensibility for quantification of tactile dysfunction. Muscle Nerve 20, 1414–1421 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199711)20:11<1414::aid-mus9>;2-d
    1. Olausson H., Wessberg J., Morrison I., McGlone F., Vallbo A. (2010). The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 185–191 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.011
    1. Penfield W., Rasmussen T. (1950). The Cerebral Cortex of Man. New York: Macmillan
    1. Provitera V., Nolano M., Pagano A., Caporaso G., Stancanelli A., Santoro L. (2007). Myelinated nerve endings in human skin. Muscle Nerve 35, 767–775 10.1002/mus.20771
    1. Rolls E. T., O‘Doherty J., Kringelbach K. M., Francis S., Bowtell R., McGlone F. (2003). Representations of pleasant and painful touch in the human orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. Cereb. Cortex 13, 308–317 10.1093/cercor/13.3.308
    1. Saal H. P., Vijayakumar S., Johansson R. S. (2009). Information about complex fingertip parameters in individual human tactile afferent neurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 8022–8031 10.1523/jneurosci.0665-09.2009
    1. Trulsson M., Francis S. T., Kelly E. F., Westling G., Bowtell R., McGlone F. (2001). Cortical responses to single mechanoreceptive afferent microstimulation revealed with fMRI. Neuroimage 13, 613–622 10.1006/nimg.2000.0723
    1. Vallbo A. B., Johansson R. S. (1984). Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum. Neurobiol. 3, 3–14
    1. Vallbo A. B., Olausson H., Wessberg J. (1999). Unmyelinated afferents constitute a second system coding tactile stimuli of the human hairy skin. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 2753–2763
    1. Vallbo A. B., Olausson H., Wessberg J., Kakuda N. (1995). Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects. J. Physiol. 483, 783–795
    1. Vallbo A., Olausson H., Wessberg J., Norrsell U. (1993). A system of unmyelinated afferents for innocuous mechanoreception in the human skin. Brain Res. 628, 301–304 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90968-s
    1. Voos A. C., Pelphrey K. A., Kaiser M. D. (2013). Autistic traits are associated with diminished neural response to affective touch. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 378–386 10.1093/scan/nss009
    1. Weinstein S. (1968). “Intensive, extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality,” in The Skin Senses, ed Kenshalo D. (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; ), 195–222
    1. Wessberg J., Olausson H., Fernström K. W., Vallbo A. B. (2003). Receptive field properties of unmyelinated tactile afferents in the human skin. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 1567–1575 10.1152/jn.00256.2002

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere