Personalised eHealth intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in rehabilitation after cardiac operations: study protocol for the PACO randomised controlled trial (NCT03470246)

Ville Vasankari, Jari Halonen, Pauliina Husu, Henri Vähä-Ypyä, Kari Tokola, Jaana Suni, Harri Sievänen, Vesa Anttila, Juhani Airaksinen, Tommi Vasankari, Juha Hartikainen, Ville Vasankari, Jari Halonen, Pauliina Husu, Henri Vähä-Ypyä, Kari Tokola, Jaana Suni, Harri Sievänen, Vesa Anttila, Juhani Airaksinen, Tommi Vasankari, Juha Hartikainen

Abstract

Introduction: Personalized intervention to increase physical Activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in rehabilitation after Cardiac Operations (PACO) is a smartphone-based and accelerometer-based eHealth intervention to increase physical activity (PA) and reduce sedentary behaviour (SB) among patients recovering from cardiac surgery.

Design: Prospective randomised controlled trial.

Methods and analysis: The present protocol describes a randomised controlled clinical trial to be conducted in the Heart Centres of Kuopio and Turku university hospitals. The trial comprises 540 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement or mitral valve repair. The patients will be randomised into two groups. The control group will receive standard postsurgical rehabilitation guidance. The eHealth intervention group will be given the same guidance together with personalised PA guidance during 90 days after discharge. These patients will receive personalised daily goals to increase PA and reduce SB via the ExSedapplication. Triaxial accelerometers will be exploited to record patients' daily accumulated PA and SB, and transmit them to the application. Using the accelerometer data, the application will provide online guidance to the patients and feedback of accomplishing their activity goals. The data will also be transmitted to the cloud, where a physiotherapist can monitor individual activity profiles and customise the subsequent PA and SB goals online. The postoperative improvement in patients' step count, PA, exercise capacity, quality of sleep, laboratory markers, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters and quality of life, and reduction in SB and incidence of major cardiac events are investigated as outcomes.

Conclusions: The PACO intervention aims to build a personalised eHealth tool for the online tutoring of cardiac surgery patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03470246.

Keywords: aortic valve replacement; aortic valve stenosis; coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; ehealth; exercise; mitral valve regurgitation; mitral valve repair; rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The implementation of the PACO Trial. PA, physical activity; QoL, quality of life; SB, sedentary behaviour.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The contacts with the eHealth intervention patient and the view of the ExSed application for eHealth intervention patients.

References

    1. Wang H, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. . Global, regional, and national under-5, adult mortality, age-specific mortality and life-expectancy, 1970-2016: a systematic analysis for global burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2017;270:1084–150.
    1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1–25. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052
    1. Vieira Ricardo D'Oliveira, Hueb W, Hlatky M, et al. . Cost-effectiveness analysis for surgical, angioplasty, or medical therapeutics for coronary artery disease: 5-year follow-up of medicine, angioplasty, or surgery Study (MASS) II trial. Circulation 2012;126(11 Suppl 1):S145–S150. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084442
    1. Coorey GM, Neubeck L, Mulley J, et al. . Effectiveness, acceptability and usefulness of mobile applications for cardiovascular disease self-management: systematic review with meta-synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:505–21. 10.1177/2047487317750913
    1. Frederix I, Driessche NV, Hansen D, et al. . Increasing the medium-term clinical benefits of hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation by physical activity telemonitoring in coronary artery disease patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015;22:150–8. 10.1177/2047487313514018
    1. Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom B, Vikström M, et al. . The importance of non-exercise physical activity for cardiovascular health and longevity. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:233–8. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092038
    1. Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, et al. . The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. The Lancet 2017;390:2643–54. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3
    1. Mann S, Jimenez A, Domone S, et al. . Comparative effects of three 48-week community-based physical activity and exercise interventions on aerobic capacity, total cholesterol and mean arterial blood pressure. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016;2:e000105 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000105
    1. Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. . Exercise-Based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1–12. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
    1. van Laar C, TImman ST, Noyez L. Decreased physical activity is a predictor for a complicated recovery post cardiac surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017;15 10.1186/s12955-016-0576-6
    1. Takahashi T, Kumamaru M, Jenkins S, et al. . In-patient step count predicts re-hospitalization after cardiac surgery. J Cardiol 2015;66:286–91. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.01.006
    1. Vasankari V, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, et al. . Association of objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with cardiovascular disease risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24:1311–8. 10.1177/2047487317711048
    1. Chau JY, Grunseit A, Midthjell K, et al. . Sedentary behaviour and risk of mortality from all-causes and cardiometabolic diseases in adults: evidence from the HUNT3 population cohort. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:737–42. 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091974
    1. Prince SA, Blanchard CM, Grace SL, et al. . Objectively-measured sedentary time and its association with markers of cardiometabolic health and fitness among cardiac rehabilitation graduates. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:818–25. 10.1177/2047487315617101
    1. Celis-Morales CA, Perez-Bravo F, Ibañez L, et al. . Objective vs. self-reported physical activity and sedentary time: effects of measurement method on relationships with risk biomarkers. PLoS One 2012;7:e36345 10.1371/journal.pone.0036345
    1. Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Husu P, et al. . Validation of Cut-Points for evaluating the intensity of physical activity with Accelerometry-Based mean amplitude deviation (Mad). PLoS One 2015;10:e0134813 10.1371/journal.pone.0134813
    1. Vähä-Ypyä H, Vasankari T, Husu P, et al. . A universal, accurate intensity-based classification of different physical activities using RAW data of accelerometer. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2015;35:64–70. 10.1111/cpf.12127
    1. Vähä-Ypyä H, Husu P, Suni J, et al. . Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip-worn accelerometer. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018;28:1092–102. 10.1111/sms.13017
    1. Ng KW, Rintala P, Husu P, et al. . Device-based physical activity levels among Finnish adolescents with functional limitations. Disabil Health J 2019;12:114–20. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.08.011
    1. Sievänen H, Kujala UM. Accelerometry-Simple, but challenging. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017;27:574–8. 10.1111/sms.12887
    1. Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, et al. . Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;128:2259–79. 10.1161/01.cir.0000435708.67487.da
    1. Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. . Sedentary behavior Research network (SBRN) – terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017;14 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
    1. van Hees VT, Sabia S, Anderson KN, et al. . A novel, open access method to assess sleep duration using a Wrist-Worn Accelerometer. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142533 10.1371/journal.pone.0142533
    1. Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 2001;33:328–36. 10.3109/07853890109002086
    1. Chan PS, Jones PG, Arnold SA, et al. . Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle angina questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:640–7. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000967
    1. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories Ats statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:111–7. 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102
    1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. . Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:233–71. 10.1093/ehjci/jev014
    1. Kemps H, Kränkel N, Dörr M, et al. . Exercise training for patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: what to pursue and how to do it. A position paper of the European association of preventive cardiology (EAPC). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019;26:709–27. 10.1177/2047487318820420
    1. Saberi S, Wheeler M, Bragg-Gresham J, et al. . Effect of moderate-intensity exercise training on peak oxygen consumption in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:1349–57. 10.1001/jama.2017.2503
    1. Belardinelli R, Paolini I, Cianci G, et al. . Exercise training intervention after coronary angioplasty: the ETICA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1891–900. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01236-0
    1. Lee J-Y, Ahn J-M, Park D-W, et al. . Impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:1804–13. 10.1177/2047487316658570
    1. Hambrecht R, Walther C, Möbius-Winkler S, et al. . Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation 2004;109:1371–8. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121360.31954.1F
    1. Sibilitz KL, Berg SK, Tang LH, et al. . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;3:CD010876 10.1002/14651858.CD010876.pub2
    1. Lin CY, He Z, Chen J, et al. . Efficacy analysis of rehabilitation therapy on patients with heart valve replacement. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;8:426–7.
    1. Sire S. Physical training and occupational rehabilitation after aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J 1987;8:1215–20. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062195
    1. Maddison R, Pfaeffli L, Whittaker R, et al. . A mobile phone intervention increases physical activity in people with cardiovascular disease: results from the heart randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015;22:701–9. 10.1177/2047487314535076
    1. Reid RD, Morrin LI, Beaton LJ, et al. . Randomized trial of an Internet-based computer-tailored expert system for physical activity in patients with heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012;19:1357–64. 10.1177/1741826711422988
    1. Frederix I, Hansen D, Coninx K, et al. . Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:674–82. 10.1177/2047487315602257
    1. Vasankari V, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, et al. . Subjects with cardiovascular disease or high disease risk are more sedentary and less active than their healthy Peers. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2018;4:e000363 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000363
    1. Xu L, Cai Z, Xiong M, et al. . Efficacy of an early home-based cardiac rehabilitation program for patients after acute myocardial infarction: a three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography randomized trial. Medicine 2016;95:e5638 10.1097/MD.0000000000005638
    1. Varghese T, Schultz WM, McCue AA, et al. . Physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease: implications for the clinician. Heart 2016;102:904–9. 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308773
    1. Qi Q, Strizich G, Merchant G, et al. . Objectively measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic biomarkers in US Hispanic/Latino adults: the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Circulation 2015;132:1560–9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016938
    1. Vasankari TJ, Kujala UM, Vasankari TM, et al. . Reduced oxidized LDL levels after a 10-month exercise program. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:1496–501. 10.1097/00005768-199810000-00005
    1. Parsons TJ, Sartini C, Welsh P, et al. . Objectively measured physical activity and cardiac biomarkers: a cross sectional population based study in older men. Int J Cardiol 2018;254:322–7. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.003
    1. Morisawa T, Ueno K, Fukuda Y, et al. . Significance of sequential cardiac rehabilitation program through inter-hospital cooperation between acute care and rehabilitation hospitals in elderly patients after cardiac surgery in Japan. Heart Vessels 2017;32:1220–6. 10.1007/s00380-017-0983-6
    1. Scalvini S, Zanelli E, Comini L, et al. . Home-based exercise rehabilitation with telemedicine following cardiac surgery. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15:297–301. 10.1258/jtt.2009.090208

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere