Role of gender in perspectives of discrimination, stigma, and attitudes relative to cervical cancer in rural Sénégal

Natalia Ongtengco, Hamidou Thiam, Zola Collins, Elly Lou De Jesus, Caryn E Peterson, Tianxiu Wang, Ellen Hendrix, Youssoupha Ndiaye, Babacar Gueye, Omar Gassama, Abdoul Aziz Kasse, Adama Faye, Jennifer S Smith, Marian Fitzgibbon, Jon Andrew Dykens, Natalia Ongtengco, Hamidou Thiam, Zola Collins, Elly Lou De Jesus, Caryn E Peterson, Tianxiu Wang, Ellen Hendrix, Youssoupha Ndiaye, Babacar Gueye, Omar Gassama, Abdoul Aziz Kasse, Adama Faye, Jennifer S Smith, Marian Fitzgibbon, Jon Andrew Dykens

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of female cancer deaths in Sénégal which is ranked 17th in incidence globally, however, the screening rate there is very low. Nuanced gendered perceptions and health behaviors of both women and men play a significant role in women's health. Our study analyzed gender differences on perceptions of gender roles, discrimination, cancer attitudes, cancer stigma, and influences in healthcare decision making within our study population to inform ongoing cervical cancer prevention work in the rural region of Kédougou, Sénégal. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 158 participants, 101 women and 57 men (ages 30-59) across nine non-probability-sampled communities from October 2018 through February 2019. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess gender differences across all variables. We also conducted analyses to determine whether there were significant differences in beliefs and attitudes, by screening behavior and by education. We found significant gender differences regarding the perception of a woman's role (P < 0.001) and a man's role (P = 0.007) as well as in the everyday discrimination questions of "decreased respect by spouse" (P < 0.001). Regarding cancer stigma, among women, 18.00% disagreed and 10.00% strongly disagreed while among men, 3.6% disagreed and 1.8% strongly disagreed that "If I had cancer, I would want my family to know that I have it." When making decisions about one's healthcare, women are more likely than men to trust social contacts such as their spouse (46.5% vs 5.3%, p < 0.001) while men are more likely than women to trust health service personnel such as a nurse (50.9% vs 18.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, men and women were both more likely to state that men have the final decision regarding the healthcare decisions of women (p < 0.001). Our data reveal structural disadvantages for women within our study population as well as gender differences in the adapted everyday discrimination scale and cancer stigma scale. Higher rates of both personal and perceived cancer stigma among women has profound implications for how population and community level communication strategies for cancer prevention and control should be designed. Efforts to advance the goal of the elimination of cervical cancer should, in the short-term, seek to gain a more profound understanding of the ways that gender, language, and other social determinants impact negative social influences and other barriers addressable through interventions. Social and behavior change communication may be one approach that can focus both on education while seeking to leverage the social influences that exist in achieving immediate and long-term goals.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Trusted opinion for healthcare decisions.
Fig 1. Trusted opinion for healthcare decisions.
Fig 2. Self-autonomy for healthcare decisions.
Fig 2. Self-autonomy for healthcare decisions.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2018. November;68(6):394–424. Available from: 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, et al. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Senegal. Summary Report [Internet]. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 2019 Jun.
    1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 11].
    1. Sherman R, Firth R, De P, Green D, Hofferkamp J, Johnson C, et al., editors. Cancer in North America: 2012–2016. Volume One: Combined Cancer Incidence for the United States, Canada and North America [Internet]. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc.; 2019.
    1. Aranda S, Berkley S, Cowal S, Dybul M, Evans T, Iversen K, et al. Ending cervical cancer: A call to action. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2017. July;138 Suppl 1:4–6. Available from: 10.1002/ijgo.12182
    1. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Gómez D, Muñoz J, et al. Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in Senegal. Summary Report [Internet]. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre); 2018.
    1. Dykens JA, Linn AM, Irwin T, Peters KE, Pyra M, Traoré F, et al. Implementing visual cervical cancer screening in Senegal: a cross-sectional study of risk factors and prevalence highlighting service utilization barriers. Int J Womens Health [Internet]. 2017. January 27;9:59–67. Available from: 10.2147/IJWH.S115454
    1. Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, Harewood R, Spika D, Wang X-S, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) [Internet]. Vol. 385, The Lancet. 2015. p. 977–1010. Available from: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62038-9
    1. Freeman HP, Chu KC. Determinants of cancer disparities: barriers to cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Surg Oncol Clin N Am [Internet]. 2005. October;14(655–9):655–69, v Available from: 10.1016/j.soc.2005.06.002
    1. Phillips SP. Defining and measuring gender: a social determinant of health whose time has come. Int J Equity Health [Internet]. 2005. July 13;4:11 Available from: 10.1186/1475-9276-4-11
    1. Travis CB, Howerton DM, Szymanski DM. Risk, Uncertainty, and Gender Stereotypes in Healthcare Decisions. Women Ther [Internet]. 2012. July 1;35(3–4):207–20. Available from: 10.1080/02703149.2012.684589
    1. Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M, et al. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet [Internet]. 2019. June 15;393(10189):2440–54. Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X
    1. Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2013. August 20;10:40 Available from: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-40
    1. Hou X, Ma N. The effect of women’s decision-making power on maternal health services uptake: evidence from Pakistan. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2013. March;28(2):176–84. Available from: 10.1093/heapol/czs042
    1. Jacobs EA, Rathouz PJ, Karavolos K, Everson-Rose SA, Janssen I, Kravitz HM, et al. Perceived discrimination is associated with reduced breast and cervical cancer screening: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Womens Health [Internet]. 2014. February;23(2):138–45. Available from: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4328
    1. Nam SK, Chu HJ, Lee MK, Lee JH, Kim N, Lee SM. A meta-analysis of gender differences in attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help. J Am Coll Health [Internet]. 2010;59(2):110–6. Available from: 10.1080/07448481.2010.483714
    1. Newman PA, Logie CH, Doukas N, Asakura K. HPV vaccine acceptability among men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect [Internet]. 2013. November;89(7):568–74. Available from: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050980
    1. Mugoya GCT, Ernst K. Gender differences in HIV-related stigma in Kenya. AIDS Care [Internet]. 2014. February;26(2):206–13. Available from: 10.1080/09540121.2013.808733
    1. Karamouzian M, Knight R, Gilbert M, Shoveller J. A review of measures used to assess HIV-related stigma among young people living with HIV: missing accounts of sex and gender. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud [Internet]. 2017. July 3;12(3):241–57. Available from: 10.1080/17450128.2016.1274462
    1. Dao NT, Woo BKP. Gender differences in perceived stigma of dementia in Chinese Americans. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry [Internet]. 2014. September;29(9):987–8. Available from: 10.1002/gps.4125
    1. Khan N, Kausar R, Khalid A, Farooq A. Gender differences among discrimination & stigma experienced by depressive patients in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci Q [Internet]. 2015. November;31(6):1432–6. Available from: 10.12669/pjms.316.8454
    1. Onah MN, Horton S. Male-female differences in households’ resource allocation and decision to seek healthcare in south-eastern Nigeria: Results from a mixed methods study. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2018. May 1;204:84–91. Available from:
    1. Daley EM, Vamos CA, Wheldon CW, Kolar SK, Baker EA. Negative emotions and stigma associated with a human papillomavirus test result: A comparison between human papillomavirus-positive men and women. J Health Psychol [Internet]. 2015. August;20(8):1073–82. Available from: 10.1177/1359105313507963
    1. Kakinami L, Newman PA, Lee S-J, Duan N. Differences in HIV vaccine acceptability between genders. AIDS Care [Internet]. 2008. May;20(5):542–6. Available from: 10.1080/09540120701867180
    1. Allen JD, Coronado GD, Williams RS, Glenn B, Escoffery C, Fernandez M, et al. A systematic review of measures used in studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability. Vaccine [Internet]. 2010. May 28;28(24):4027–37. Available from: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.063
    1. Treves-Kagan S, El Ayadi AM, Pettifor A, MacPhail C, Twine R, Maman S, et al. Gender, HIV Testing and Stigma: The Association of HIV Testing Behaviors and Community-Level and Individual-Level Stigma in Rural South Africa Differ for Men and Women. AIDS Behav [Internet]. 2017. September;21(9):2579–88. Available from: 10.1007/s10461-016-1671-8
    1. Jarrett C, Wilson R, O’Leary M, Eckersberger E, Larson HJ. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy—A systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 33, Vaccine. 2015. p. 4180–90. Available from: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040
    1. Pedersen ER, Paves AP. Comparing perceived public stigma and personal stigma of mental health treatment seeking in a young adult sample [Internet]. Vol. 219, Psychiatry Research. 2014. p. 143–50. Available from: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.017
    1. Poirier J, Cobb NK. Social Influence as a Driver of Engagement in a Web-Based Health Intervention [Internet]. Vol. 14, Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2012. p. e36 Available from: 10.2196/jmir.1957
    1. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition [Internet]. Simon and Schuster; 2010. 518 p.
    1. Pryor JB, Reeder GD, Wesselmann ED, Williams KD, Wirth JH. The influence of social norms upon behavioral expressions of implicit and explicit weight-related stigma in an interactive game. Yale J Biol Med [Internet]. 2013. June;86(2):189–201. Available from:
    1. Reid AE, Cialdini RB, Aiken LS. Social Norms and Health Behavior In: Steptoe A, editor. Handbook of Behavioral Medicine: Methods and Applications [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2010. p. 263–74. 10.1007/978-0-387-09488-5_19
    1. OpenStreetMap [Internet]. OpenStreetMap. [cited 2019 Nov 21].
    1. Field Papers [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 21].
    1. Williams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB. Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health [Internet]. Vol. 2, Journal of Health Psychology. 1997. p. 335–51. Available from: 10.1177/135910539700200305
    1. Marlow LAV, Wardle J. Development of a scale to assess cancer stigma in the non-patient population. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2014. April 23;14:285 Available from: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-285
    1. Braunschweiger P, Goodman KW. The CITI program: an international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med [Internet]. 2007. September;82(9):861–4. Available from: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7770
    1. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet [Internet]. 2008. November 8;372(9650):1661–9. Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6
    1. De Abreu CS. How socio-cultural factors affect cervical cancer screening adherence and treatment in disadvantaged communities in the greater Cape Town, South Africa [Internet]. University of Cape Town; 2015.
    1. Haynes VE. Sociocultural Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Behaviors in Cusco, Peru [Internet]. University of South Carolina; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 28].
    1. Sabado P. Exploring Individual and Social Determinants of Health to Improve Access to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening for Cambodian and Thai Women in California. 2014 Jan 1;

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere