Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain

Silje E Reme, Eli M Hagen, Hege R Eriksen, Silje E Reme, Eli M Hagen, Hege R Eriksen

Abstract

Background: Brief intervention programs for subacute low back pain (LBP) result in significant reduction of sick leave compared to treatment as usual. Although effective, a substantial proportion of the patients do not return to work. This study investigates predictors of return to work in LBP patients participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing a brief intervention program (BI) with BI and physical exercise.

Methods: Predictors for not returning to work was examined in 246 patients sick listed 8-12 weeks for low back pain. The patients had participated in a randomized controlled trial, with BI (n = 122) and BI + physical exercise (n = 124). There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups on return to work. The groups were therefore merged in the analyses of predictors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for non return to work at 3, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

Results: At 3 months of follow-up, the strongest predictors for not returning to work were pain intensity while resting (OR = 5.6; CI = 1.7-19), the perception of constant back strain when working (OR = 4.1; CI = 1.5-12), negative expectations for return to work (OR = 4.2; CI = 1.7-10), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 3.3; CI = 1.3-8.3). At 12 months, perceived reduced ability to walk far due to the complaints (OR = 2.6; CI = 1.3-5.4), pain during activities (OR = 2.4; CI = 1.1-5.1), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 2.1; CI = 1.1-4.3) were the strongest predictors for non return to work. At 24 months age below 41 years (OR = 2.9; CI = 1.4-6.0) was the only significant predictor for non return to work.

Conclusion: It appears that return to work is highly dependant on individual and cognitive factors. Patients not returning to work after the interventions were characterized by negative expectations, perceptions about pain and disability, and previous physiotherapy treatment. This is the first study reporting that previous treatment by physiotherapists is a risk factor for long-term sick leave. This has not been reported before and is an interesting finding that deserves more scrutiny.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participation and follow up data.

References

    1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354(9178):581–585. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4.
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) 2001;51(2):124–135.
    1. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Haestrup C. Can it be predicted which patients with chronic low back pain should be offered tertiary rehabilitation in a functional restoration program? A search for demographic, socioeconomic, and physical predictors. Spine. 1998;23(16):1775–1783. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00010. discussion 1783-1774.
    1. Magnussen L, Nilsen S, Raheim M. Barriers against returning to work--as perceived by disability pensioners with back pain: a focus group based qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(3):191–197. doi: 10.1080/09638280600747793.
    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192–300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
    1. Hagen EM, Ødelien KH, Lie SA, Eriksen HR. Do physical exercises give additional effect on reducing sick leave for low back pain?- A 2 year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2009. revised and re-submitted.
    1. Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine. 2000;25(15):1973–1976. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00017.
    1. Indahl A, Haldorsen EH, Holm S, Reikeras O, Ursin H. Five-year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine. 1998;23(23):2625–2630. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00018.
    1. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine. 1995;20(4):473–477. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512150-00006.
    1. Molde Hagen E, Grasdal A, Eriksen HR. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study. Spine. 2003;28(20):2309–2315. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085817.33211.3F. discussion 2316.
    1. Brox JI, Storheim K, Grotle M, Tveito TH, Indahl A, Eriksen HR. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with back schools, brief education, and fear-avoidance training. Spine J. 2008;8(1):28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.008.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2005. p. CD000335.
    1. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine. 2002;27(5):E109–120. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017.
    1. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine. 2000;25(16):2114–2125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017.
    1. Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine. 2000;25(9):1148–1156. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017.
    1. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine. 1995;20(6):722–728. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014.
    1. Hasenbring M. Predictors of efficacy in treatment of chronic low back pain. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 1998;11(5):553–558. doi: 10.1097/00001503-199810000-00018.
    1. McCracken LM, Turk DC. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process. Spine. 2002;27(22):2564–2573. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00033.
    1. Hulst M van der, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Ijzerman MJ. A systematic review of sociodemographic, physical, and psychological predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or, back school treatment outcome in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(7):813–825. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157414.47713.78.
    1. Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2005;62(12):851–860. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842.
    1. Giezen AM van der, Bouter LM, Nijhuis FJ. Prediction of return-to-work of low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Pain. 2000;87(3):285–294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00292-X.
    1. Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study. Cmaj. 2002;166(6):749–754.
    1. Sandstrom J, Esbjornsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient's own prediction. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. 1986;18(1):29–33.
    1. Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, Jansen J. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine. 1997;22(9):990–1001. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00011.
    1. Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. Chronic pain-associated depression: antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review. The Clinical journal of pain. 1997;13(2):116–137. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199706000-00006.
    1. Haldorsen EM, Kronholm K, Skouen JS, Ursin H. Predictors for outcome of a multi-modal cognitive behavioural treatment program for low back pain patients-a 12-month follow-up study. European journal of pain (London, England) 1998;2(4):293–307. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(98)90028-3.
    1. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–168. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B.
    1. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral science. 1974;19(1):1–15. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830190102.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC) Scand J Public Health. 1999;27(1):63–72. doi: 10.1177/14034948990270010401.
    1. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004.
    1. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. The Clinical journal of pain. 2004;20(5):309–318. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.
    1. Cooper C. The Stress Check: Coping with the Stresses of Life and Work. Prentice Hall; 1981.
    1. Eriksen HR, Olff M, Ursin H. The CODE: a revised battery for coping and defense and its relations to subjective health. Scandinavian journal of psychology. 1997;38(3):175–182. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00025.
    1. Skargren EI, Oberg BE. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of low-back and neck pain in patients treated in primary care: comparison between the treatment strategies chiropractic and physiotherapy. Pain. 1998;77(2):201–207. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00101-8.
    1. Hagen EM, Svensen E, Eriksen HR. Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients. Spine. 2005;30(24):2717–2723. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000190394.05359.c7.
    1. Milhous RL, Haugh LD, Frymoyer JW, Ruess JM, Gallagher RM, Wilder DG, Callas PW. Determinants of vocational disability in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(8):589–593.
    1. Fishbain DA, Cutler RB, Rosomoff HL, Khalil T, Steele-Rosomoff R. Impact of chronic pain patients' job perception variables on actual return to work. The Clinical journal of pain. 1997;13(3):197–206. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199709000-00004.
    1. Wallston BD, Wallston KA. Locus of control and health: a review of the literature. Health Educ Monogr. 1978;6(2):107–117.
    1. Ursin H, Eriksen HR. The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(5):567–592. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00091-X.
    1. Hooftman WE, Westerman MJ, Beek AJ van der, Bongers PM, van Mechelen W. What makes men and women with musculoskeletal complaints decide they are too sick to work? Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2008;34(2):107–112.
    1. Werner EL, Ihlebaek C, Skouen JS, Laerum E. Beliefs about low back pain in the Norwegian general population: are they related to pain experiences and health professionals? Spine. 2005;30(15):1770–1776. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000171909.81632.fe.
    1. Fritz JM, Cleland JA, Speckman M, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ. Physical therapy for acute low back pain: associations with subsequent healthcare costs. Spine. 2008;33(16):1800–1805. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd853.
    1. Fuertes JN, Mislowack A, Bennett J, Paul L, Gilbert TC, Fontan G, Boylan LS. The physician-patient working alliance. Patient education and counseling. 2007;66(1):29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.013.
    1. Magnusson M, Granqvist M, Jonson R, Lindell V, Lundberg U, Wallin L, Hansson T. The loads on the lumbar spine during work at an assembly line. The risks for fatigue injuries of vertebral bodies. Spine. 1990;15(8):774–779. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199008010-00007.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Subjective health complaints, sensitization, and sustained cognitive activation (stress) Journal of psychosomatic research. 2004;56(4):445–448. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00629-9.
    1. Ursin H, Eriksen HR. Sensitization, subjective health complaints, and sustained arousal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001;933:119–129.
    1. Brosschot JF. Cognitive-emotional sensitization and somatic health complaints. Scandinavian journal of psychology. 2002;43(2):113–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00276.
    1. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. [New York]: Basic Books; 1990.
    1. Hagen EM, Grasdal A, Eriksen HR. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study. Spine. 2003;28(20):2309–2315. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085817.33211.3F. discussion 2316.
    1. Linton SJ, Ryberg M. A cognitive-behavioral group intervention as prevention for persistent neck and back pain in a non-patient population: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2001;90(1-2):83–90. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00390-0.
    1. Newton-John TR, Spence SH, Schotte D. Cognitive-behavioural therapy versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Behaviour research and therapy. 1995;33(6):691–697. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00008-L.
    1. Linton SJ, Boersma K, Jansson M, Svard L, Botvalde M. The effects of cognitive-behavioral and physical therapy preventive interventions on pain-related sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. The Clinical journal of pain. 2005;21(2):109–119. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200503000-00001.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere