The continuum of ovarian response leading to BIRTH, a real world study of ART in Spain

Marcos Ferrando, Buenaventura Coroleu, Luis Rodríguez-Tabernero, Gorka Barrenetxea, Cristina Guix, Fernando Sánchez, Julian Jenkins, BIRTH study group, Jordi Aragonès Sanahuja, Ramón Aurell Ballesteros, Delia Báez Quintana, Agustín Ballesteros Boluda, Gorka Barrenetxea Ziarrusta, Emilio Bayón Álvarez, Buenaventura Coloreu Lletget, Pilar Conte Martín, José Antonio Domínguez Arroyo, Marcos Ferrando Serrano, Josu Franco Iriarte, José Félix García España, Miguel Ángel García Jiménez, María José Iñarra, Javier Martínez Cortés, Moisés Moreira Pacheco, Cristina Guix Galcerán, Ángel Rocas Huertos, Amelia Rodríguez-Aranda, Luis Rodríguez Tabernero, Bárbara Romero Guadix, Mª Del Carmen Sanabria Rodríguez, Fernando Sánchez Martín, Alejandra Torres Afonso, Margarita Torres Vives, Jesús Zabaleta Jurio, Marcos Ferrando, Buenaventura Coroleu, Luis Rodríguez-Tabernero, Gorka Barrenetxea, Cristina Guix, Fernando Sánchez, Julian Jenkins, BIRTH study group, Jordi Aragonès Sanahuja, Ramón Aurell Ballesteros, Delia Báez Quintana, Agustín Ballesteros Boluda, Gorka Barrenetxea Ziarrusta, Emilio Bayón Álvarez, Buenaventura Coloreu Lletget, Pilar Conte Martín, José Antonio Domínguez Arroyo, Marcos Ferrando Serrano, Josu Franco Iriarte, José Félix García España, Miguel Ángel García Jiménez, María José Iñarra, Javier Martínez Cortés, Moisés Moreira Pacheco, Cristina Guix Galcerán, Ángel Rocas Huertos, Amelia Rodríguez-Aranda, Luis Rodríguez Tabernero, Bárbara Romero Guadix, Mª Del Carmen Sanabria Rodríguez, Fernando Sánchez Martín, Alejandra Torres Afonso, Margarita Torres Vives, Jesús Zabaleta Jurio

Abstract

Background: The first biosimilar of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) launched in Europe was Bemfola® in 2014 following a clinical development programme demonstrating efficacy and safety to the satisfaction of the European Medicines Agency. Since then the increasing use of biosimilar rFSH has provided the opportunity to study both effectiveness across the whole population and the variation of rFSH use during routine clinical care in a real-world setting in Spain.

Methods: This is a real-world study of 1222 women treated in 26 assisted reproduction treatment centres throughout Spain providing experience of the use of a biosimilar recombinant follicle stimulating hormone in four distinct populations. The four populations studied were poor responders, suboptimal responders, normal responders and oocyte donors. The primary endpoint was the total number of oocytes retrieved. Secondary endpoints included number of days of rFSH stimulation, total dose of rFSH administered, number of MII oocytes, number of fertilized oocytes, quality of embryos, number of embryos transferred, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates following embryo transfer, number of multiple pregnancies and number of serious adverse reactions, including moderate-to-severe OHSS.

Results: Differences were seen across the populations both in the characteristics of the women and ART outcomes suggestive of a continuum of fertility prognosis. In the poor responders, suboptimal responders, normal responders and oocyte donor populations the mean age in years was 39.9 (±SD 3.4), 38.4 (±SD 2.9), 34.4 (±SD 3.3) and 26 (±SD 4.6) respectively and number of oocytes retrieved was 4.1 (±SD 2.7), 8.6 (±SD 6.0), 12.2 (±SD 7.2) and 19.5 (±SD 9.5) respectively. The proportion of embryos graded as best quality was 18.5%, 33.0% and 43.8%, and graded as worst quality was 20.4%, 5.8% and 5.8% for poor responders, suboptimal responders and normal responders respectively. In a similar pattern, for poor responders, suboptimal responders and normal responders the implantation rates were 16.0%, (8/50), 22.4% (49/219), 30.6% (97/317) respectively and clinical pregnancy rates were 23.2% (10/43), 30.4% (59/194) and 37.0% (114/308) respectively. Adverse events were reported in only 7 of 1222 women (0.6%).

Conclusions: Overall the results were consistent with the national ART results reported for Spain, hence this study provides reassurance of the clinical effectiveness of a biosimilar rFSH used in a real world setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier - NCT02941341.

Keywords: Bemfola; Biosimilar; Combination protocols; FSH; Follitropin CRS; IVF; Real world study.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsJJ is a medical advisor to Preglem SA / Gedeon Richter. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests. The data analysis was performed by the Contract Research Organisation, Dynamic, under the direction of the Medical Affairs department of Preglem SA / Gedeon Richter and the final manuscript was drafted by the Medical Affairs department in collaboration with the authors; in both cases there was no involvement of Preglem SA / Gedeon Richter marketing or commercial teams.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Embryos graded according to the “Criterios ASEBIR de Valoración Morfológica de Oocitos, Embriones Tempranos y Blastocistos Humanos”; A = top quality; B = good quality (not for elective single embryo transfer); C = impaired embryo quality; D = do not recommend to transfer (includes all multinucleated embryos); ND = not classified [10, 11]

References

    1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, Scaravelli G, Smeenk J, Vidakovic S, Goossens V. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1586–1601. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey242.
    1. Foxon G, Mitchell P, Turner N, McConnell A, Kendrew H, Jenkins J. Bemfola® fixed dose pens potentially reduce drug wastage and associated costs of infertility treatment. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2018;21:275–280. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1328131.
    1. de Mora F, Fauser BCJM. Biosimilars to recombinant human FSH medicines: comparable efficacy and safety to the original biologic. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.020.
    1. Quintero LA, Merino VV, de la Fuente Bitaine L, Olivares Vela RO, Rayward J, Torres Afonso AT, Báez Quintana DB, Pinochet CA, Giménez MAG, Trías AG, Jenkins J. An evaluation by potential IVF/Donor Oocyte patients of the Use and Handling of the Bemfola® Pen compared with the Gonal-f® Pen and Puregon Pen® Revista Iberoamericana de Fertilidad y Reproducción Humana / Vol. 33 n° 3 Julio-Agosto-Septiembre 2016.
    1. European Medicines Agencies (EMA) Guideline on non-clinical and clinical development of similar biological medicinal products containing recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) 21 February 2013 EMA/CHMP/BMWP/671292/2010 . Accessed 13 July 2020.
    1. Wolzt M, Gouya G, Sator M, Hemetsberger T, Irps C, Rettenbacher M, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between Bemfola® and Gonal-f® after subcutaneous application. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2016;41:259–265. doi: 10.1007/s13318-015-0257-6.
    1. Rettenbacher M, Andersen AN, Garcia-Velasco JA, Sator M, Barri P, Lindenberg S, van der Ven K, Khalaf Y, Bentin-Ley U, Obruca A, Tews G, Schenk M, Strowitzki T, Narvekar N, Sator K, Imthurn B. A multi-Centre phase 3 study comparing efficacy and safety of Bemfola® versus Gonal-f® in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30:504–513. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.005.
    1. Haynes B. Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcare interventions is evolving. BMJ. 1999;319:652–653. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.652.
    1. European Medicines Agencies (EMA) Network Strategy to 2020 Working together to improve health EMA/MB/151414/2015. . Accessed 13 July 2020.
    1. Ferraretti AP, La MA, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–1624. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092.
    1. ASEBIR: Asociación para el Estudio de la Biología de la Reproducción . CUADERNOS DE EMBRIOLOGÍA CLÍNICA. Criterios ASEBIR de Valoración Morfológica de Ovocitos, Embriones Tempranos y Blastocitos Humanos. [3ª] 2015.
    1. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul Consensus Workshop on Embryo Assessment: Proceedings of an Expert Meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–1283. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037.
    1. Jenkins J, Daya S, Kremer J, Balasch J, Barratt C, Cooke I, Lawford-Davies J, De Sutter P, Suikari AM, Neulen J, Nygren K. European classification of infertility taskforce (ECIT) response to Habbema et al., 'Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: a proposal'. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2687–2688. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh499.
    1. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1058–1061.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048.
    1. Bozdag G, Polat I, Yarali I, Yarali H. Live birth rates in various subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;34:639–644. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.009.
    1. Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. Poseidon group (patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualized oocyte number) a new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1452–1453. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005.
    1. Haahr T, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Poor definition of poor-ovarian response results in misleading clinical recommendations. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:979–980. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey059.
    1. Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, Fanchin R. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the follicular output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1066–1072. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der479.
    1. Sociedad Española de Fertilidad (SEF). Informe estadístico de Técnicas de Reproducción Asistida 2017. . Accessed 13 July 2020.
    1. ESHRE Guideline on ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI October 2019. . Accessed 13 July 2020.
    1. Humaidan P, Chin W, Rogoff D, D’Hooghe T, Longobardi S, Hubbard J, Schertz J. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:544–555. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex208.
    1. Santi D, Casarini L, Alviggi C, Simoni M. Efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone, FSH + luteinizing hormone, human menopausal gonadotropin or FSH + human chorionic gonadotropin on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the “personalized” medicine era: a meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00114.
    1. Devroey P, Pellicer A, Nyboe Andersen A, Arce JC. Menopur in GnRH antagonist cycles with single embryo transfer trial group. A randomized assessor-blind trial comparing highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:561–571. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.016.
    1. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). Information Leaflet Ph. Eur. Reference Standard Follitropin Chemical Reference Substance batch 2. Strasbourg; 2017. . Accessed 13 July 2020.
    1. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) Laboratory Report: Establishment of follitropin for peptide mapping and glycan analysis Follitropin Chemical Reference Substance 2. European Pharmacopoeia Commission. Strasbourg: EDQM report; 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere