Improved Treatment Effect of Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release in Patients with Concordant Baseline Pain Scores on the Average Daily Pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Scales

Edgar Ross, Nathaniel P Katz, Philip G Conaghan, Alan Kivitz, Dennis C Turk, Andrew I Spitzer, Deryk G Jones, Ryan K Lanier, Amy Cinar, Joelle Lufkin, Scott D Kelley, Edgar Ross, Nathaniel P Katz, Philip G Conaghan, Alan Kivitz, Dennis C Turk, Andrew I Spitzer, Deryk G Jones, Ryan K Lanier, Amy Cinar, Joelle Lufkin, Scott D Kelley

Abstract

Introduction: A phase 3 randomized controlled study comparing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER) to conventional TA crystalline suspension (TAcs) reported variable efficacy results. Enrollment criteria may have contributed to this discrepancy, as moderate-to-severe average daily pain (ADP) was required at baseline, whereas no limitations were placed on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-A) pain severity. We conducted a post hoc sensitivity analysis to compare treatment effects in patients reporting moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain on both scales.

Methods: Participants > 40 years old with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to a single intra-articular injection of TA-ER 32 mg, TAcs 40 mg, or saline-placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Patient-reported ADP, WOMAC-A, rescue medication usage, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Participants who reported moderate-to-severe OA pain at baseline using both instruments (ADP ≥ 5 to ≤ 9, maximum 10 and WOMAC-A ≥ 2, maximum 4) were categorized as "concordant" pain reporters; patients with baseline moderate-to-severe OA on ADP only were termed "discordant" pain reporters.

Results: Two-hundred-ninety-two concordant pain reporters of 484 total subjects received TA-ER 32 mg (n = 95), TAcs 40 mg (n = 100), or saline-placebo (n = 97). Baseline characteristics and AE profiles of the concordant and discordant pain responders were consistent with the full analysis population. Among concordant pain reporters, TA-ER significantly (p < 0.05) improved ADP scores vs. TAcs (weeks 5-19; area-under-the-effect [AUE]weeks1-12; AUEweeks1-24) and saline-placebo (weeks 1-20; AUEweeks1-12; AUEweeks1-24). At week 12, a higher proportion reported no knee pain (ADP = 0) with TA-ER (~ 28%) vs. TAcs (~ 8%). TA-ER significantly improved WOMAC-A vs. TAcs at weeks 4, 8, and 12, with significant reduction in rescue medication usage observed with TA-ER from weeks 2 to 20 vs. TAcs.

Conclusions: In patients reporting moderate-to-severe knee OA pain at baseline based on concordant ADP and WOMAC-A scores, TA-ER provided statistically significant pain relief for ≥ 12 weeks compared with conventional TAcs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02357459.

Keywords: Corticosteroid; Intra-articular; Knee osteoarthritis; Pain; Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between ADP and normalized WOMAC-A-derived baseline pain assessments in the phase 3 full analysis set. NRS numeric rating scale, TAcs triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension, TA-ER triamcinolone acetonide extended-release, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Data from the phase 3 FAS population: TA-ER (n = 161), saline-placebo (n = 162), TAcs (n = 161) [14]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean changes from baseline in ADP scores over time among concordant pain reporters. ap < 0.05 vs. saline-placebo; bp < 0.05 vs. TAcs. ADP average daily pain, LSM least-squares mean, TAcs triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension, TA-ER triamcinolone acetonide extended-release
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequency distribution of ADP scores at baseline, week 1, and week 12 among concordant pain reporters. ADP scores rated on a 0–10 NRS, with 0 indicating “no pain” and 10 indicating “pain as bad as you can imagine.” ADP average daily pain, NRS numeric rating scale, TAcs triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension, TA-ER triamcinolone acetonide extended-release
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean change from baseline in WOMAC-A (pain) score among concordant pain reporters. ap < 0.05 vs. saline-placebo; bp < 0.05 vs. TAcs. LSM least-squares mean, TAcs triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension, TA-ER triamcinolone acetonide extended-release, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean rescue medication usage among concordant pain reporters. ap < 0.05 vs. saline-placebo; bp < 0.05 vs. TAcs. LSM least-squares mean, TAcs triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension, TA-ER triamcinolone acetonide extended-release

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Osteoarthritis Fact Sheet. Last reviewed July 27, 2020. Accessed August 5, 2021. .
    1. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI). Osteoarthritis: A Serious Disease. Submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration December 1, 2016. Accessed August 5, 2021. .
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for Industry: Analgesic Indications: Developing Drug and Biological Products [Draft Guidance]. Silver Spring: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); February 2014.
    1. Reginster JY, Reiter-Niesert S, Bruyere O, Berenbaum F, Brandi ML, Branco J, et al. Recommendations for an update of the 2010 European regulatory guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products used in the treatment of osteoarthritis and reflections about related clinically relevant outcomes: expert consensus statement. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23:2086–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.07.001.
    1. Smith TO, Hawker GA, Hunter DJ, March LM, Boers M, Shea BJ, et al. The OMERACT-OARSI core domain set for measurement in clinical trials of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:981–989. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181194.
    1. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:129–138.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, et al. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012.
    1. Younger J, McCue R, Mackey S. Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13:39–43. doi: 10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x.
    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.
    1. Juni P, Hari R, Rutjes AW, Fischer R, Silletta MG, Reichenbach S, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD005328.
    1. da Costa BR, Hari R, Juni P. Intra-articular corticosteroids for osteoarthritis of the knee. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2671–2672. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17565.
    1. Bodick N, Lufkin J, Willwerth C, Kumar A, Bolognese J, Schoonmaker C, et al. An intra-articular, extended-release formulation of triamcinolone acetonide prolongs and amplifies analgesic effect in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:877–888. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00918.
    1. Conaghan PG, Cohen SB, Berenbaum F, Lufkin J, Johnson JR, Bodick N. Phase 2b trial of a novel extended-release microsphere formulation of triamcinolone acetonide for intra-articular injection in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:204–211. doi: 10.1002/art.40364.
    1. Conaghan PG, Hunter DJ, Cohen SB, Kraus VB, Berenbaum F, Lieberman JR, et al. Effects of a single intra-articular injection of a microsphere formulation of triamcinolone acetonide on knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:666–677. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00154.
    1. Spitzer AI, Richmond JC, Kraus VB, Gomoll A, Jones DG, Huffman KM, et al. Safety and efficacy of repeat administration of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release in osteoarthritis of the knee: a phase 3b, open-label study. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6:109–124. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0140-z.
    1. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1986;29:1039–1049. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816.
    1. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494.
    1. Kapstad H, Hanestad BR, Langeland N, Rustoen T, Stavem K. Cutpoints for mild, moderate and severe pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee ready for joint replacement surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-55.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Kraus VB, Conaghan PG, Aazami HA, Mehra P, Kivitz AJ, Lufkin J, et al. Synovial and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) following intra-articular (IA) injection of an extended-release microsphere-based formulation (FX006) or standard crystalline suspension in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.10.003.
    1. Zilretta™ (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension) [package insert]. Burlington: Flexion Therapeutics, Inc.; January 2020.
    1. Langworthy MJ, Conaghan PG, Ruane JJ, Kivitz AJ, Lufkin J, Cinar A, et al. Efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release in participants with unilateral knee osteoarthritis: a post hoc analysis. Adv Ther. 2019;36:1398–1411. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00944-3.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere