The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial

Manabu Kanazawa, Mariko Tanoue, Anna Miyayasu, Shin Takeshita, Daisuke Sato, Mari Asami, Thuy Vo Lam, Khaing Myat Thu, Ken Oda, Yuriko Komagamine, Shunsuke Minakuchi, Jocelyne Feine, Manabu Kanazawa, Mariko Tanoue, Anna Miyayasu, Shin Takeshita, Daisuke Sato, Mari Asami, Thuy Vo Lam, Khaing Myat Thu, Ken Oda, Yuriko Komagamine, Shunsuke Minakuchi, Jocelyne Feine

Abstract

Background: Mandibular overdentures retained by a single implant placed in the midline of edentulous mandible have been reported to be more comfortable and function better than complete dentures. Although single-implant overdentures are still more costly than conventional complete dentures, there are a few studies which investigated whether mandibular single-implant overdentures are superior to complete dentures when patient general satisfaction is compared. The aim of this study is to assess patient general satisfaction with mandibular single-implant overdentures and complete dentures.

Methods: This study is a randomized crossover trial to compare mandibular single-implant overdentures and complete dentures in edentulous individuals. Participant recruitment is ongoing at the time of this submission. Twenty-two participants will be recruited. New mandibular complete dentures will be fabricated. A single implant will be placed in the midline of the edentulous mandible. The mucosal surface of the complete denture around the implant will be relieved for 3 months. The participants will then be randomly allocated into 2 groups according to the order of the interventions; group 1 will receive single-implant overdentures first and will wear them for 2 months, followed by complete dentures for 2 months. Group 2 will receive the same treatments in a reverse order. After experiencing the 2 interventions, the participants will choose one of the mandibular prostheses, and yearly follow-up visits are planned for 5 years. The primary outcome of this trial is patient ratings of general satisfaction on 100 mm visual analog scales. Assessments of the prostheses and oral health-related quality of life will also be recorded as patient-reported outcomes. The secondary outcomes are cost and time for treatment. Masticatory efficiency and cognitive capacity will also be recorded. Furthermore, qualitative research will be performed to investigate the factors associated with success of these mandibular denture types. Clinical outcomes, such as implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and prosthodontic complications, will also be recorded.

Discussion: The results of this randomized crossover trial will clarify whether mandibular single implants and overdentures for edentulous individuals provide better patient general satisfaction when compared to conventional complete dentures.

Trial registration: This clinical trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center (UMIN000017883).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing interventions. CD = complete denture.

References

    1. Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:81–92.
    1. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:5–8.
    1. Chiapasco M, Gatti C. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a 3- to 8-year prospective study on 328 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:29–38.
    1. Stephan G, Vidot F, Noharet R, et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparative pilot study of immediate loading versus delayed loading after two years. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(6 suppl):S138–45.
    1. Omura Y, Kanazawa M, Sato D, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between immediately and conventionally loaded mandibular two-implant overdentures: a preliminary study. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:185–92.
    1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002;19:3–4.
    1. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients—the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009;207:185–6.
    1. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: a five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:159–65.
    1. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, et al. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:330–7.
    1. Harder S, Wolfart S, Egert C, et al. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures—results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent 2011;39:656–61.
    1. Passia N, Wolfart S, Kern M. Six-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures—a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1191–4.
    1. Passia N, Abou-Ayash S, Reissmann DR, et al. Single mandibular implant study (SMIS)—masticatory performance—results from a randomized clinical trial using two different loading protocols. J Dent 2017;65:64–9.
    1. Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, et al. Satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients with immediately loaded mandibular overdentures supported by one or two dental implants: results of a 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:128–36.
    1. Kern M, Att W, Fritzer E, et al. Survival and complications of single dental implants in the edentulous mandible following immediate or delayed loading: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2018;97:163–70.
    1. Bryant SR, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. J Dent Res 2015;94:36–43.
    1. Ahmed Elawady DM, Kaddah AF, Talaat Khalifa M. Single vs 2 implants on peri-implant marginal bone level and implant failures in mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2017;17:216–25.
    1. Marcus SE, Kaste LM, Brown LJ. Prevalence and demographic correlates of tooth loss among the elderly in the United States. Spec Care Dentist 1994;14:123–7.
    1. Cooper LF. The current and future treatment of edentulism. J Prosthodont 2009;18:116–22.
    1. Ochi M, Kanazawa M, Sato D, et al. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Comput Biol Med 2013;43:1653–60.
    1. Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Kaiba Y, et al. Association between self-assessment of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:847–57.
    1. Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Kaiba Y, et al. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures. BMC Oral Health 2014;14:45.
    1. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Yamaga E, et al. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Gerodontology 2012;29:e1033–7.
    1. Naito M, Suzukamo Y, Nakayama T, et al. Linguistic adaptation and validation of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in an elderly Japanese population. J Public Health Dent 2006;66:273–5.
    1. Kobayashi S, Honda S, Murakami K, et al. Both comprehensive and brief self-administered diet history questionnaires satisfactorily rank nutrient intakes in Japanese adults. J Epidemiol 2012;22:151–9.
    1. Fujiwara Y, Suzuki H, Yasunaga M, et al. Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2010;10:225–32.
    1. Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S, et al. Association between masticatory performance using a colour-changeable chewing gum and jaw movement. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:555–63.
    1. Ikebe K, Morii K, Matsuda K, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy in measuring masticatory performance using test gummy jelly. Prosthodont Res Pract 2005;4:9–15.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere