Using routine inpatient data to identify patients at risk of hospital readmission

Stuart Howell, Michael Coory, Jennifer Martin, Stephen Duckett, Stuart Howell, Michael Coory, Jennifer Martin, Stephen Duckett

Abstract

Background: A relatively small percentage of patients with chronic medical conditions account for a much larger percentage of inpatient costs. There is some evidence that case-management can improve health and quality-of-life and reduce the number of times these patients are readmitted. To assess whether a statistical algorithm, based on routine inpatient data, can be used to identify patients at risk of readmission and who would therefore benefit from case-management.

Methods: Queensland database study of public-hospital patients, who had at least one emergency admission for a chronic medical condition (e.g., congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes or dementia) during 2005/2006. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop an algorithm to predict readmission within 12 months. The performance of the algorithm was tested against recorded readmissions using sensitivity, specificity, and Likelihood Ratios (positive and negative).

Results: Several factors were identified that predicted readmission (i.e., age, co-morbidities, economic disadvantage, number of previous admissions). The discriminatory power of the model was modest as determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (c = 0.65). At a risk score threshold of 50, the algorithm identified only 44.7% (95% CI: 42.5%, 46.9%) of patients admitted with a reference condition who had an admission in the next 12 months; 37.5% (95% CI: 35.0%, 40.0%) of patients were flagged incorrectly (they did not have a subsequent admission).

Conclusion: A statistical algorithm based on Queensland hospital inpatient data, performed only moderately in identifying patients at risk of readmission. The main problem is that there are too many false negatives, which means that many patients who might benefit would not be offered case-management.

References

    1. Schwartz W, Mendelson D. Hospital cost containment in the 1980s. Hard lessons and prospects for the 1990s. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1037–1042.
    1. Calver J, Brameld KJ, Preen DB, Alexia SJ, Boldy DP, McCaul KA. High-cost users of hospital beds in Western Australia: a population-based record linkage study. Med J Aust. 2006;184:393–7.
    1. Moss J, Flower C, Houghton L. A multidisciplinary Care Coordination Team improves emergency department discharge plannign practice. Med J Aust. 2002;177:435–439.
    1. Shepperd S, Parkes J, McClaran J, Phillips C. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003. p. CD000313.
    1. Hutt R, Rosen R, McCauley J. Case-managing long-term conditions: What impact does it have in the treatment of older people? London, Kings Fund; 2004.
    1. Boaden R, Dusheiko M, Gravelle H, Parker S, Pickard S, Roland M. Evercare evaluation interim report: implications for supporting people with long term conditions. 2005.
    1. Smith SM, Allwright S, O'Dowd T. Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management. CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews. 2007. p. CD004910.
    1. Phillips C, Wright S, Kern D, Singa R, Shepperd S, Rubin H. Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;291:1358–1367. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.11.1358.
    1. Parker SG, Peet SM, McPherson A, Cannaby AM, Abrams K, Baker R, Wilson A, Lindesay J, Parker G, Jones DR. A systematic review of discharge arrangements for older people. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6
    1. Liddy C, Dusseault J, Dahrouge S, Hogg W, Lemelin J, Humbert J. Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illness. Pilot study. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:58–65.
    1. Billings J, Dixon J, Mijanovich T, Wennberg D. Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients. BMJ.
    1. Bottle A, Aylin P, Majeed A. Identifying patients at high risk of emergency hospital admissions: a logistic regression analysis. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:406–414. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.8.406.
    1. Donnan PT, Dorward DWT, Mutch B, Morris AD. Development and validation of a model for predicting emergency admissions of the next year (POENY). A UK historical cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1416–1422. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1416.
    1. Billings J, Mijanovich T. Improving the management of care for high-cost medicaid patients. Health Affairs. 2007;26:1643–1655. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1643.
    1. Department of Health and Ageing . Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups, Version 51. Canberra: Australian Government; 2005.
    1. Queensland Health. Manual for the Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2007.
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics . Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Cat No 20390. Canberra: ABS; 2004.
    1. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare . Rural, regional and remote health A guide to remoteness classifications AIHW Cat No PHE 53. Canberra: AIHW; 2004.
    1. Billings J, Mijanovich T, Dixon J, Curry N, Wennberg D, Darin B, Steinort K. Case finding algorithms for patients at risk of rehospitalisation PARR1 and PARR2. 2006.
    1. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Second. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
    1. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271:703–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.9.703.
    1. National Cancer Institute of Canada and American Cancer Society (NCI/ACS) A collaborative study of a test for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the sera of patients with carcinoma of the rectum and colon. Can Med Assoc J. 1972;107:25–33.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere