The role of stem cells in osteoarthritis: An experimental study in rabbits

A Singh, S C Goel, K K Gupta, M Kumar, G R Arun, H Patil, V Kumaraswamy, S Jha, A Singh, S C Goel, K K Gupta, M Kumar, G R Arun, H Patil, V Kumaraswamy, S Jha

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressively debilitating disease that affects mostly cartilage, with associated changes in the bone. The increasing incidence of OA and an ageing population, coupled with insufficient therapeutic choices, has led to focus on the potential of stem cells as a novel strategy for cartilage repair.

Methods: In this study, we used scaffold-free mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) obtained from bone marrow in an experimental animal model of OA by direct intra-articular injection. MSCs were isolated from 2.8 kg white New Zealand rabbits. There were ten in the study group and ten in the control group. OA was induced by unilateral transection of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee joint. At 12 weeks post-operatively, a single dose of 1 million cells suspended in 1 ml of medium was delivered to the injured knee by direct intra-articular injection. The control group received 1 ml of medium without cells. The knees were examined at 16 and 20 weeks following surgery. Repair was investigated radiologically, grossly and histologically using haematoxylin and eosin, Safranin-O and toluidine blue staining.

Results: Radiological assessment confirmed development of OA changes after 12 weeks. Rabbits receiving MSCs showed a lower degree of cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation, and subchondral sclerosis than the control group at 20 weeks post-operatively. The quality of cartilage was significantly better in the cell-treated group compared with the control group after 20 weeks.

Conclusions: Bone marrow-derived MSCs could be promising cell sources for the treatment of OA. Neither stem cell culture nor scaffolds are absolutely necessary for a favourable outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:32-7.

Keywords: MSC; Mesenchymal stem cells; OA; Osteoarthritis; Rabbit model; Repair.

Conflict of interest statement

ICMJE Conflict of Interest:None declared

Figures

Figs. 1a - 1d
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figures 1a and 1b – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks post-operatively, showing a reduction in lesion severity and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing further reduction in lesion severity. Figures 1c and 1d – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the control group at c) 16 and d) 20 weeks post-operatively, showing characteristics of osteoarthritis (OA) becoming more evident between time-points.
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figures 1a and 1b – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks post-operatively, showing a reduction in lesion severity and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing further reduction in lesion severity. Figures 1c and 1d – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the control group at c) 16 and d) 20 weeks post-operatively, showing characteristics of osteoarthritis (OA) becoming more evident between time-points.
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figures 1a and 1b – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks post-operatively, showing a reduction in lesion severity and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing further reduction in lesion severity. Figures 1c and 1d – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the control group at c) 16 and d) 20 weeks post-operatively, showing characteristics of osteoarthritis (OA) becoming more evident between time-points.
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figs. 1a - 1d
Figures 1a and 1b – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks post-operatively, showing a reduction in lesion severity and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing further reduction in lesion severity. Figures 1c and 1d – gross photographs of femoral condyles in the control group at c) 16 and d) 20 weeks post-operatively, showing characteristics of osteoarthritis (OA) becoming more evident between time-points.
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figures 2a and 2b – histological images of articular cartilage in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing appropriate thickness, normal distribution of the cells and consistent staining of the cartilage, with the surface layer showing very mild irregularity (haematoxylin and eosin, ×40). Figures 2c and 2d – histological images of articular cartilage in the control group c) at 16 weeks and d) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing structural disorganisation and severe hypocellularity of chondrocytes.
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figures 2a and 2b – histological images of articular cartilage in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing appropriate thickness, normal distribution of the cells and consistent staining of the cartilage, with the surface layer showing very mild irregularity (haematoxylin and eosin, ×40). Figures 2c and 2d – histological images of articular cartilage in the control group c) at 16 weeks and d) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing structural disorganisation and severe hypocellularity of chondrocytes.
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figures 2a and 2b – histological images of articular cartilage in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing appropriate thickness, normal distribution of the cells and consistent staining of the cartilage, with the surface layer showing very mild irregularity (haematoxylin and eosin, ×40). Figures 2c and 2d – histological images of articular cartilage in the control group c) at 16 weeks and d) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing structural disorganisation and severe hypocellularity of chondrocytes.
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figs. 2a - 2d
Figures 2a and 2b – histological images of articular cartilage in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group a) at 16 weeks and b) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing appropriate thickness, normal distribution of the cells and consistent staining of the cartilage, with the surface layer showing very mild irregularity (haematoxylin and eosin, ×40). Figures 2c and 2d – histological images of articular cartilage in the control group c) at 16 weeks and d) at 20 weeks post-operatively, showing structural disorganisation and severe hypocellularity of chondrocytes.
Figs. 3a - 3b
Figs. 3a - 3b
Figure 3a – anteroposterior (AP) radiographs at 16 weeks post-operatively in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group (left) and the control group (right). Figure 3b – AP radiographs at 20 weeks post-operatively in the MSC-treated group (left) and the control group (right). Radiological evaluation at both time-points shows less severe radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) (including osteophyte formation, subchondral bone sclerosis and articular surface irregularity) in the MSC group compared with the controls.
Figs. 3a - 3b
Figs. 3a - 3b
Figure 3a – anteroposterior (AP) radiographs at 16 weeks post-operatively in the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-treated group (left) and the control group (right). Figure 3b – AP radiographs at 20 weeks post-operatively in the MSC-treated group (left) and the control group (right). Radiological evaluation at both time-points shows less severe radiological signs of osteoarthritis (OA) (including osteophyte formation, subchondral bone sclerosis and articular surface irregularity) in the MSC group compared with the controls.

References

    1. Brooks PM. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability?: social consequences and health economic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:573–577
    1. Dennison E, Cooper C. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology and classification. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, et al, eds. Rheumatology London: Mosby, 2003:1781–1791.
    1. Lapsley HM, March LM, Tribe KL, Cross MJ, Brooks PM. Living with osteoarthritis: patient expenditures, health status, and social impact. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:301–306
    1. Mapel DW, Shainline M, Paez K, Gunter M. Hospital, pharmacy, and outpatient costs for osteoarthritis and chronic back pain. J Rheumatol 2004;31:573–583
    1. Brandt KD, Dieppe P, Radin EL. Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008;34:531–559
    1. Loeser RF Jr. Aging and the etiopathogenesis and treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000;26:547–567
    1. Hunter DJ. Osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011;25:801–814
    1. McIlwraith CW. General pathobiology of the joint and response to injury. In: McIlwraith CW, Trotter GW, eds. Joint disease in the horse Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:40–70.
    1. De Bari C, Dell’Accio F. Mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatology: a regenerative approach to joint repair. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007;113:339–348
    1. Kolf CM, Cho E, Tuan RS. Mesenchymal stromal cells: biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9:204.
    1. Yoshioka M, Coutts RD, Amiel D, Hacker SA. Characterization of a model of osteoarthritis in the rabbit knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996;4:87–98
    1. Vignon E, Bejui J, Mathieu P, et al. Histological cartilage changes in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1987;14:104–106
    1. van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:1895–1903
    1. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143–147
    1. Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 2005;105:1815–1822
    1. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:485–493
    1. Mankin HJ, Dorfman H, Lippiello L, Zarins A. Biochemical andmetabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteoarthritic human hips: II: correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1971;53-A:523–537
    1. Wakitani S, Imoto K, Yamamoto T, et al. Human autologous culture expanded bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation for repair of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:199–206
    1. Murphy JM, Fink DJ, Hunziker EB, Barry FP. Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:3464–3474
    1. Grigolo B, Lisignoli G, Desando G, et al. Osteoarthritis treated with mesenchymal stem cells on hyaluronan-based scaffold in rabbit. Tissue Eng Part C 2009;15:647–658
    1. Chong A, Ang D, Goh J, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells influence early tendon-healing in a rabbit achilles tendon model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:74–81
    1. Ricco S, Renzi S, Del Bue M, et al. Allogeneic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in combination with platelet rich plasma are safe and effective in the therapy of superficial digital flexor tendonitis in the horse. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2013;26(Suppl):61–68
    1. Anderson DG, Markova D, An HS, et al. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the cultured rabbit intervertebral disc: a novel cellsource for disc repair. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92:420–429
    1. Li Z, Liao W, Zhao Q, et al. Angiogenesis and bone regeneration by allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell intravenous transplantation in rabbit model of avascular necrotic femoral head. J Surg Res 2013;183:193–203
    1. Barry FP. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in joint disease. Novartis Found Symp 2003;249:86-96; discussion 96-102, 170-4, 239-41.
    1. Kobayashi T, Ochi M, Yanada S, et al. A novel cell delivery system using magnetically labeled mesenchymal stem cells and an external magnetic device for clinical cartilage repair. Arthroscopy 2008;24:69–76
    1. Kuroda R, Ishida K, Matsumoto T, et al. Treatment of a full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the femoral condyle of an athlete with autologous bone-marrow stromal cells. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:226–231
    1. Pasut A, Oleynik P, Rudnicki MA. Isolation of muscle stem cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting cytometry. Methods Mol Biol 2012;798:53–64
    1. Williams EL, White K, Oreffo RO. Isolation and enrichment of Stro-1 immunoselected mesenchymal stem cells from adult human bone marrow. Methods Mol Biol 2013;1035:67–73
    1. Stern MM, Tygrett LT, Waldschmidt TJ, Bickenbach JR. Cells isolated from the epidermis by Hoechst dye exclusion, small size, and negative selection for hematopoietic markers can generate B lymphocyte precursors. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:1386–1396
    1. Shihabuddin LS. Adult rodent spinal cord-derived neural stem cells: isolation and characterization. Methods Mol Biol 2008;438:55–66
    1. Koga H, Shimaya M, Muneta T, et al. Local adherent technique for transplanting mesenchymal stem cells as a potential treatment of cartilage defect. Arthritis Res Ther 2008;10:R84.
    1. Guo X, Park H, Liu G, et al. In vitro generation of an osteochondral construct using injectable hydrogel composites encapsulating rabbit marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2009;30:2741–2752
    1. Toghraie FS, Chenari N, Gholipour MA, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis with infrapatellar fat pad derived mesenchymal stem cells in rabbit. Knee 2011;18:71–75
    1. Uccelli A, Pistoia V, Moretta L. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new strategy for immunosuppression. Trends Immunol 2007;28:219–226
    1. Chen X, Armstrong MA, Li G. Mesenchymal stemcells in immunoregulation. Immunol Cell Biol 2006;84:413–421
    1. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem 2006;98:1076–1084

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere