Educational strategy for the development of skills in exchange transfusion: a randomized clinical trial protocol

María José Maldonado, Sergio Iván Agudelo, Juan David Suarez, Oscar Gamboa, María José Maldonado, Sergio Iván Agudelo, Juan David Suarez, Oscar Gamboa

Abstract

Background: Exchange transfusion is a highly complex procedure that requires high levels of expertise. Trainee paediatricians do not have adequate training in exchange transfusion because opportunities to perform this procedure in practice are scarce. This protocol seeks to compare two educational interventions for exchange transfusion that allow students to develop competencies to perform the technique in an appropriate and safe way.

Methods/design: This is a randomized parallel single-blind clinical trial with allocation by simple randomization to the educational intervention (simulation or a digital didactic environment). Students from the paediatric specialization who volunteer to participate will be included. A practical evaluation of the procedure will be performed through a simulated scenario using a standardized clinical case. The main outcome is defined as the result of evaluation using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination; superior performance will be defined when the percentage is greater than or equal to 85%, and non-superior performance will be defined when the result is less than 84%. The chi-square independence test or the Fisher exact test will be used to evaluate the effect of the interventions. Multivariate analysis will be performed using a non-conditional logistic regression model. Stata 15® software will be used.

Discussion: Exchange transfusion is a procedure that requires expertise to achieve adequate outcomes. The inclusion of new educational strategies, such as simulation and digital didactic environments, is seen as a training option that can improve performance in clinical skills, reduce adverse events and increase the level of trust.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04070066. Registered on 28 August 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Keywords: Individual assessment; Newborn; Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE); Safety training; Simulation centre; Simulation training; Telemedicine; Virtual.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of enrolment, intervention, and assessment. OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule protocol. OSCE, Objective Structured Clinical Examination

References

    1. Murki S, Kumar P. Blood exchange transfusion for infants with severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Semin Perinatol. 2011. 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.013.
    1. Falciglia HS. Past and present in neonatal exchange transfusion. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016;114(2):191–192. doi: 10.5546/aap.2016.191.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2004;114(1):297–316. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.297.
    1. Philip AG, Diamond LK, Pearson HA. Historicalperspectives: the rise and fall of exchange transfusion. Neoreviews. 2003;4(7):e169–e174. doi: 10.1542/neo.4-7-e169.
    1. Welch SA, Gawthorne JL, Berry MJ. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Med J Aust. 2012;196(9):594. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11474.
    1. Paige JT, Arora S, Fernandez G, Seymour N. Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation-based training. Am J Surg. 2015;209(1):126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.05.034.
    1. Ker J, Bradley P. Simulation in medical education. In Swanwick, T. (Ed), Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. pp. 164–180.
    1. Iván Agudelo S, María D, Maldonado J, Orozco DC, Restrepo J, Gamboa O. Efecto de un sistema de enseñanza personalizado en la evaluación de competencias en el manejo del neonato. [Effects of the personalized teaching system in the evaluation of competencies in handling of neonate] Educación Médica Superior. 2015;29(4):725–741.
    1. Mayville ML. Debriefing: the essential step in simulation. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2011;11(1):35–39. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2010.12.012.
    1. Gómez-Restrepo C, Narváez YR. Pacientes virtuales en la enseñanza médica. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2012;41:37S–43S. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60177-3.
    1. Calhoun AW, Bhanji F, Sherbino J, Hatala R. Simulation for high-stakes assessment in pediatric emergency medicine. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2016;17(3):212–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cpem.2016.05.001.
    1. Sawyer T, Sierocka-Castaneda A, Chan D, Berg B, Lustik M, Thompson M. Deliberate practice using simulation improves neonatal resuscitation performance. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2011;6(6):327–336. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822b1307.
    1. Gaies MG, Morris SA, Hafler JP, et al. Reforming procedural skills training for pediatric residents: a randomized, interventional trial. Pediatrics. 2009;124(2):610–619. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2658.
    1. Sudikoff SN, Overly FL, Shapiro MJ. High-fidelity medical simulation as a technique to improve pediatric residents’ emergency airway management and teamwork: a pilot study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25:651–656. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bd93ea.
    1. Kessler DO, Auerbach M, Pusic M, Tunik MG, Foltin JC. A randomized trial of simulation-based deliberate practice for infant lumbar puncture skills. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(4):197–203. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318216bfc1.
    1. Tofil NM, Benner KW, Zinkan L, Alten J, Varisco BM, White ML. Pediatric intensive care simulation course: a new paradigm in teaching. J Gr Med Educ. 2011;3(1):81–87. doi: 10.4300/jgme-d-10-00070.1.
    1. McKimm J, Swanwick T. Clinical teaching made easy: a practical guide to teaching and learning in clinical settings. Br J Hosp Med. 2010;71(6)133–44.
    1. Marrero Pérez MD, Santana Machado AT, Águila Rivalta Y, Pérez de León A. Las imágenes digitales como medios de enseñanza en la docencia de las ciencias médicas. Edumecentro. 2016;8(1):125–142.
    1. Ruiz-Parra AI, Angel-Müller E, Guevara O. Clinical simulation and virtual learning: complementary technologies for medical education. Rev Fac Med. 2009;57(1):67–79.
    1. Cumin D, Merry AF, Weller JM. Standards for simulation. Anaesthesia. 2008. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05787.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere