Distance to first symptoms measured by the 6-min walking test differentiates between treatment success and failure in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders

Anna M Zeitlberger, Marketa Sosnova, Michal Ziga, Oliver P Gautschi, Luca Regli, Oliver Bozinov, Astrid Weyerbrock, Martin N Stienen, Nicolai Maldaner, Anna M Zeitlberger, Marketa Sosnova, Michal Ziga, Oliver P Gautschi, Luca Regli, Oliver Bozinov, Astrid Weyerbrock, Martin N Stienen, Nicolai Maldaner

Abstract

Purpose: The smartphone-based 6-min walking test (6WT) is an established digital outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). In addition to the 6WTs primary outcome measure, the 6-min walking distance (6WD), the patient's distance to first symptoms (DTFS) and time to first symptoms (TTFS) can be recorded. This is the first study to analyse the psychometric properties of the DTFS and TTFS.

Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients (55 ± 15.8 years) completed the 6WT pre- and 6 weeks (W6) postoperative. DTFS and TTFS were assessed for reliability and content validity using disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire patient satisfaction subscale was used as external criterion for treatment success. Internal and external responsiveness for both measures at W6 was evaluated.

Results: There was a significant improvement in DTFS and TTFS from baseline to W6 (p < 0.001). Both measures demonstrated a good test-retest reliability (β = 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.90 and β = 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.87, both p < 0.001). The DTFS exceeded the 6WD capability to differentiate between satisfied (82%) and unsatisfied patients (18%) with an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.53-0.98) vs. 0.70 (95% CI 0.52-0.90). The TTFS did not demonstrate meaningful discriminative abilities.

Conclusion: Change in DTFS can differentiate between satisfied and unsatisfied patients after spine surgery. Digital outcome measures on the 6WT metric provide spine surgeons and researchers with a mean to assess their patient's functional disability and response to surgical treatment in DLD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03977961.

Keywords: 6-min walking test; 6WT; Distance to first symptoms; Functional self-assessment; Objective functional impairment.

© 2022. The Author(s).

References

    1. Arnold PM, Robbins S, Paullus W et al (2009) Clinical outcomes of lumbar degenerative disc disease treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion allograft spacer: a prospective, multicenter trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthop Belle Mead 38(7):E115-122
    1. McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL (2013) Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. JAAOS 21(2):99
    1. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA et al (2014) Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT). Spine 39(1):3–16
    1. Maldaner N, Stienen MN (2020) Subjective and objective measures of symptoms, function, and outcome in patients with degenerative spine disease. Arthritis Care Res 72(Suppl 10):183–199
    1. Stienen MN, Ho AL, Staartjes VE et al (2019) Objective measures of functional impairment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 19(7):1276–1293
    1. Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM et al (2020) Evaluation of the 6-minute walking test as a smartphone app-based self-measurement of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine 7:1–10
    1. Tosic L, Goldberger E, Maldaner N et al (2020) Normative data of a smartphone app-based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures. J Neurosurg Spine 29:1–10
    1. Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M et al (2020) Smartphone-based self-assessment of objective functional impairment (6-minute walking test) in patients undergoing epidural steroid injection. Neurospine 17(1):136–142
    1. Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M et al (2020) Longitudinal smartphone-based self-assessment of objective functional impairment in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: initial experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 162(9):2061–2068
    1. Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M et al (2020) Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disorders favor smartphone-based objective self-assessment over paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 21:610–617
    1. Debono B, Bousquet P, Sabatier P et al (2016) Postoperative monitoring with a mobile application after ambulatory lumbar discectomy: an effective tool for spine surgeons. Eur Spine J 25(11):3536–3542
    1. Maldaner N, Tomkins-Lane C, Desai A et al (2020) Digital transformation in spine research and outcome assessment. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 20(2):310–311
    1. Stienen MN, Gautschi OP, Staartjes VE et al (2019) Reliability of the 6-minute walking test smartphone application. J Neurosurg Spine 13:1–8
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428
    1. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163
    1. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH (1997) Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 77(7):745–750
    1. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42
    1. Hurri H, Sainio P, Kinnunen H et al (2009) Walking distance as a measure of disability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthop Proc 91-B(SUPP_II):285–285
    1. Tomkins-Lane CC, Battié MC (2010) Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 35(23):2097–2102
    1. Barz T, Melloh M, Staub L et al (2008) The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 17(5):686–690
    1. Stienen MN, Maldaner N, Sosnova M et al (2020) External validation of the timed up and go test as measure of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. Neurosurgery 88:E142–E149
    1. Rainville J, Childs LA, Peña EB et al (2021) Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis–a comparative study. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 12(2):101–109
    1. Swerts PM, Mostert R, Wouters EF (1990) Comparison of corridor and treadmill walking in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Phys Ther 70(7):439–442
    1. Moon E-S, Kim H-S, Park J-O et al (2005) Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis. Yonsei Med J 46(6):806–811

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere