Low-volume cycling training improves body composition and functionality in older people with multimorbidity: a randomized controlled trial

Eduardo Carballeira, Karla C Censi, Ana Maseda, Rocío López-López, Laura Lorenzo-López, José C Millán-Calenti, Eduardo Carballeira, Karla C Censi, Ana Maseda, Rocío López-López, Laura Lorenzo-López, José C Millán-Calenti

Abstract

Physical exercise, when practiced regularly and in adequate doses, is a proven nonpharmacological measure that helps to prevent and reverse noncommunicable diseases, as well as reduce mortality rates from any cause. In general, older adults perform insufficient physical activity and do not meet the doses recommended by the World Health Organization for the improvement of health through physical activity. However, there is little evidence on adequate doses of exercise in older people, especially in those with multimorbidity. Our main aim was to evaluate the effect of a 6-week intervention on health-related outcomes (body composition, hemodynamic and functionality changes) in 24 individuals aged 65 and older with multimorbidity in a randomized controlled trial. The intervention consisted of a very low volume (60 min per week) of low-to-moderate intensity exercise training (perception of effort from 3 to 6 on an 11-point scale). After the intervention, blood pressure was significantly (p = 0.038) reduced in the exercise group (EG), with a higher reduction in men. Furthermore, the EG decreased their waist circumference (p = 0.005), a proxy of abdominal adiposity, and demonstrated an increased likelihood (73%) that a randomly selected change in muscle mass score from the EG would be greater than a randomly selected change score from the control group. The exercise intervention was particularly effective in enhancing the functionality of older adults with multimorbidity, especially in walking speed and balance skills. Perceptually regulated intensity during exercise training seemed to be a very interesting strategy to train individuals with low physical fitness and comorbidities. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04842396).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Raincloud plot of the changes in the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment total score (POMA-T) and the Short Physical Performance Battery total score (SPPB-T) in the exercise (n = 12) and control groups (n = 12). Points are raw data obtained for each participant at each moment of measurement. Box plots represent the median (i.e., the line near the middle of the box) and interquartile range (IQR, lower quartile = 25th percentile and upper quartile = 75th percentile). The whiskers on either side of the IQR represent the lowest and highest quartiles of the data. The ends of the whiskers represent the maximum and minimum data values, and the individual dots beyond the whiskers represent outliers in the data set. Clouds represent probability density, and point and error bars in the base of the clouds are the mean ± SD. The dotted line represents the direction of the pre- and postintervention change in the two group means.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pearson correlations between percentage changes in body composition variables. Changes in the control group (CG) are represented by a solid line, diamond points, and solid line density plot. Changes in the exercise group (EG) are represented by a long-dashed line, filled circle points, and a dashed line density plot. Significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Consort flow chart for the selection and allocation of participants in the exercise and control groups.

References

    1. Nunes BP, Flores TR, Mielke GI, Thumé E, Facchini LA. Multimorbidity and mortality in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016;67:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.07.008.
    1. Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr. Physiol. 2012;2:1143–1211. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110025.
    1. Pedersen BK. The physiology of optimizing health with a focus on exercise as medicine. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019;81:607–627. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020518-114339.
    1. Fiuza-Luces C, Garatachea N, Berger NA, Lucia A. Exercise is the real polypill. Physiology. 2013;28:330–358. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00019.2013.
    1. Campbell JP, Turner JE. Debunking the myth of exercise-induced immune suppression: Redefining the impact of exercise on immunological health across the lifespan. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:648. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00648.
    1. Cunningham C, O’Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2020;30:816–827. doi: 10.1111/sms.13616.
    1. Groot C, et al. The effect of physical activity on cognitive function in patients with dementia: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016;25:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.11.005.
    1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health. 2018;6:e1077–e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.
    1. World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world (2018).
    1. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. (2010).
    1. Holland AE, Lee AL. Precision medicine, healthy living and the complex patient: Managing the patient with multimorbidity. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019;62:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.12.010.
    1. Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Reflections on physical activity and health: What should we recommend? Can. J. Cardiol. 2016;32:495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.024.
    1. Füzéki E, Banzer W. Physical activity recommendations for health and beyond in currently inactive populations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051042.
    1. Geidl W, Abu-Omar K, Weege M, Messing S, Pfeifer K. German recommendations for physical activity and physical activity promotion in adults with noncommunicable diseases. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0919-x.
    1. O’Caoimh R, et al. Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE Joint Action Member States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita. 2018;54:226–238.
    1. Kojima G. Prevalence of frailty in nursing homes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2015;16:940–945. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.025.
    1. Foulds HJA, Bredin SSD, Charlesworth SA, Ivey AC, Warburton DER. Exercise volume and intensity: A dose-response relationship with health benefits. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014;114:1563–1571. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2887-9.
    1. Wen CP, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378:1244–1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6.
    1. van Baak MA. Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and exercise. An update. Sports Med. 1988;5:209–225. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198805040-00002.
    1. Abbiss CR, Peiffer JJ, Meeusen R, Skorski S. Role of ratings of perceived exertion during self-paced exercise: What are we actually measuring? Sports Med. 2015;45:1235–1243. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0344-5.
    1. Mitchell BL, Davison K, Parfitt G, Spedding S, Eston RG. Physiological and perceived exertion responses during exercise: Effect of β-blockade. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019;51:782–791. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001845.
    1. McAuliffe L, et al. Combining perceptual regulation and exergaming for exercise prescription in low-active adults with and without cognitive impairment. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2018;10:2. doi: 10.1186/s13102-018-0091-7.
    1. LaMonte MJ, et al. Both light intensity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity measured by accelerometry are favorably associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in older women: The objective physical activity and cardiovascular health (opach) study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e007064.
    1. Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ. Evidence to support including lifestyle light-intensity recommendations in physical activity guidelines for older adults. Am. J. Health Promot. 2015;29:277–284. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130709-QUAN-354.
    1. Cartee GD, Hepple RT, Bamman MM, Zierath JR. Exercise promotes healthy aging of skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2016;23:1034–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.007.
    1. Cornelissen VA, Smart NA. Exercise training for blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e004473. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.004473.
    1. Naci H, et al. How does exercise treatment compare with antihypertensive medications? A network meta-analysis of 391 randomised controlled trials assessing exercise and medication effects on systolic blood pressure. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019;53:859–869. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099921.
    1. Parker BA, Kalasky MJ, Proctor DN. Evidence for sex differences in cardiovascular aging and adaptive responses to physical activity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010;110:235–246. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1506-7.
    1. Ribeiro AS, Nunes JP, Schoenfeld BJ. Selection of resistance exercises for older individuals: The forgotten variable. Sports Med. 2020;50:1051–1057. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01260-5.
    1. Beaudart C, et al. Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) Calcif. Tissue Int. 2019;105:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00545-w.
    1. Valenzuela PL, et al. Physical exercise in the oldest old. Compr. Physiol. 2019;9:1281–1304. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c190002.
    1. Faber MJ, Bosscher RJ, van Wieringen PCW. Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Phys. Ther. 2006;86:944–954. doi: 10.1093/ptj/86.7.944.
    1. Reid KF, Fielding RA. Skeletal muscle power. A critical determinant of physical functioning in older adults. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2012;40:4–12. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e31823b5f13.
    1. Tschopp M, Sattelmayer MK, Hilfiker R. Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2011;40:549–556. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr005.
    1. Reisberg B, Ferris S, de Leon M, Crook T. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am. J. Psychiatry. 1982;139:1136–1139. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136.
    1. Mezzani A, et al. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitati on. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2013;20:442–467. doi: 10.1177/2047487312460484.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1986;34:119–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x.
    1. Guralnik JM, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: Association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. 1994;49:85–94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.M85.
    1. Guidetti L, et al. Validation of the OMNI-cycle scale of perceived exertion in the elderly. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2011;19:214–224. doi: 10.1123/japa.19.3.214.
    1. Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. nparLD: an R Software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. J. Stat. Softw.50, (2012).
    1. The jamovi project. jamovi [Internet]. (2020).
    1. Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 2013;4:863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
    1. Rosenthal J. Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. J. Soc. Serv. Res. 1996;21(4):37–59. doi: 10.1300/J079v21n04_02.
    1. Vargha A, Delaney HD. A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 2000;25:101–132.
    1. Allen M, Poggiali D, Whitaker K, Marshall TR, Kievit RA. Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere