The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia

Nabil Aziz, Nabil Aziz

Abstract

Azoospermia is a descriptive term referring to ejaculates that lack spermatozoa without implying a specific underlying cause. The traditional definition of azoospermia is ambiguous, which has ramifications on the diagnostic criteria. This issue is further compounded by the apparent overlap between the definitions of oligospermia and azoospermia. The reliable diagnosis of the absence of spermatozoa in a semen sample is an important criterion not only for diagnosing male infertility but also for ascertaining the success of a vasectomy and for determining the efficacy of hormonal contraception. There appears to be different levels of rigor in diagnosing azoospermia in different clinical situations, which highlights the conflict between scientific research and clinical practice in defining azoospermia.

References

    1. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, et al. Incidence and Main Causes of Infertility in a Resident Population (1850000) of 3 French Regions (1988-1989) Hum Reprod. 1991;6(6):811–6.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. 5th ed.
    1. Eliasson R. Burger H, de Kretser D, Analysis of semen The testis 1981New York: Raven Press; p 381–99.
    1. Male Infertility Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on optimal evaluation of the infertile male. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5 Suppl 1):S202–9.
    1. Jaffe TM, Kim ED, Hoekstra TH, Lipshultz LI. Sperm pellet analysis: A technique to detect the presence of sperm in men considered to have azoospermia by routine semen analysis. J Urology. 1998;159(5):1548–50.
    1. Sharif K. Reclassification of azoospermia: the time has come. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(2):237–8.
    1. Ezeh UIO, Moore HMD. Redefining azoospermia and its implications. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(1):213–4.
    1. Bjorndahl L, Kvist U. Sequence of ejaculation affects the spermatozoon as a carrier and its message. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(4):440–8.
    1. Castilla JA, Alvarez C, Aguilar J, Gonzalez-Varea C, Gonzalvo MC, Martinez L. Influence of analytical and biological variation on the clinical interpretation of seminal parameters. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):847–51.
    1. Carlsen E, Petersen JH, Andersson AM, Skakkebaek NE. Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(2):358–66.
    1. Keel BA. Within- and between-subject variation in semen parameters in infertile men and normal semen donors. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):128–34.
    1. de la Taille A, Rigot JM, Mahe P, Gervais R, Dumur V, Lemaitre L, et al. [Correlation of genitourinary abnormalities, spermiogram and CFTR genotype in patients with bilateral agenesis of the vas deferens] Prog Urol. 1998;8(3):370–6.
    1. Daudin M, Bieth E, Bujan L, Massat G, Pontonnier F, Mieusset R. Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: clinical characteristics, biological parameters, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene mutations, and implications for genetic counseling. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(6):1164–74.
    1. Weiske WH, Salzler N, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weidner W. Clinical findings in congenital absence of the vasa deferentia. Andrologia. 2000;32(1):13–8.
    1. Mortimer D. Hargreave T, Semen analysis and other standard laboratory tests Male Infertility 1994London: Springer; p. 55–6.2nd ed
    1. Aust TR, Brookes S, Troup SA, Fraser WD, Lewis-Jones DI. Development and in vitro testing of a new method of urine preparation for retrograde ejaculation; the Liverpool solution. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):885–91.
    1. Jefferys A, Siassakos D, Wardle P. The management of retrograde ejaculation: a systematic review and update. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):306–U551.
    1. Meacham R. From Androlog. J Androl. 2002;23(3):330–1.
    1. Lindsay KS, Floyd I, Swan R. Classification of Azoospermic Samples. Lancet. 1995;345(8965):1642.
    1. Corea M, Campagnone J, Sigman M. The diagnosis of azoospermia depends on the force of centrifugation. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(4):920–2.
    1. Lindsay KS, Floyd I, Swan R. Classification of azoospermic patients. Lancet. 1995;345(8965):1642.
    1. Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Jonckheere J, Callewaert N, Grootenhuis AJ, Kersemaekers WM, et al. Azoospermia: virtual reality or possible to quantify. J Androl. 2006;27(4):483–90.
    1. Mortimer D. Practical Laboratory Andrology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
    1. NAFA and ESHRE-SIGA. Manual on Basic Semen Analysis (2002) Accessed 2012. Available from: .
    1. World Health Organisation. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. 4th ed.
    1. Aziz N, Saleh RA, Sharma RK, Lewis-Jones I, Esfandiari N, Thomas AJ, et al. Novel association between sperm reactive oxygen species production, sperm morphological defects, and the sperm deformity index. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(2):349–54.
    1. Aziz N, Agarwal A. Evaluation of sperm damage: beyond the World Health Organization criteria. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):484–5.
    1. Aziz N, Novotny J, Oborna I, Fingerova H, Brezinova J, Svobodova M. Comparison of chemiluminescence and flow cytometry in the estimation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in human semen. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2604–8.
    1. Batruch I, Smith CR, Mullen BJ, Grober E, Lo KC, Diamandis EP, et al. Analysis of Seminal Plasma from Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia and Identification of Candidate Biomarkers of Male Infertility. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(3):1503–11.
    1. Riddell D, Pacey A, Whittington K. Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3441–5.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere