Necessary but not sufficient? Engaging young people in the development of an avatar-based online intervention designed to provide psychosocial support to young people affected by their own or a family member's cancer diagnosis

Ceri Phelps, Masoumeh Minou, Andrew Baker, Carol Hughes, Helen French, Wayne Hawkins, Andrew Leeuwenberg, Rebecca Crabtree, Paul B Hutchings, Ceri Phelps, Masoumeh Minou, Andrew Baker, Carol Hughes, Helen French, Wayne Hawkins, Andrew Leeuwenberg, Rebecca Crabtree, Paul B Hutchings

Abstract

Objective: This study discusses the challenges and successes of engaging young people in a project aimed at developing an online counselling intervention for young people affected by cancer.

Context: For younger people with a diagnosis of cancer or who are caring for someone with cancer, the psychosocial consequences can create significant challenges for their social and educational development. Whilst young people have been shown to be reluctant to make use of traditional face-to-face counselling, research is beginning to suggest that effective therapeutic relationships can be formed with young people online.

Design: The first phase of the study involved working with a 'Young Persons' Panel' of healthy school pupils and university students to develop and pilot an online counselling intervention and study materials in preparation for a pilot evaluation of the intervention.

Intervention: An avatar-based virtual reality counselling world was created where young people can create their own avatar and receive counselling over the Internet from a qualified counsellor via an avatar in a virtual reality world.

Findings: The process of engaging young people in the C:EVOLVE project enabled a unique intervention to be developed and demonstrated positive developmental opportunities. However, despite the rigorous approach to the development of the intervention, initial attempts within the pilot evaluation phase of the study showed difficulties recruiting to the study, and this phase of the study has currently ceased whilst further exploratory work takes place.

Conclusion: This study has demonstrated the complexities of intervention development and evaluation research targeted at young people and the challenges created when attempting to bring clinical practice and research evaluation together.

Keywords: avatar counselling; cancer; intervention development; online counselling; young people.

© 2016 The Authors. Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of intervention interface.

References

    1. Coristine M, Crooks D, Grunfeld E, Stonebridge C, Christie A. Caregiving for women with advanced breast cancer. Psychooncology, 2003; 12: 709–719.
    1. Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. European Journal of Cancer, 2003; 39: 1517–1524.
    1. Vanderwerker LC, Laff RE, Kadan‐Lottick NS, McColl S, Prigerson HG. Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use among caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005; 23: 6899–6907.
    1. Cantrell MA, Conte TM. Enhancing hope among early female survivors of childhood cancer via the internet: a feasibility study. Cancer Nursing, 2008; 31: 370–379.
    1. Cantrell MA, Conte TM. Between being cured and being healed: the paradox of childhood cancer survivorship. Qualitative Health Research, 2009; 19: 312–322.
    1. Zelter L, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D, Zebrack B, Casillas J, Tsao J. Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009; 27: 2396–2404.
    1. Larcombe IJ, Walker J, Charlton A, Meller S, Morris Jones P, Mott MG. Impact of childhood cancer on return to normal schooling. British Medical Journal, 1990; 301: 169–171.
    1. Pang JWY, Friedman DL, Whitton MS et al Employment statu among adult survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatric Blood and Cancer, 2008; 50: 104–110.
    1. Langeveld NE, Grootenhuis MA, Voute PA, De Haan RJ, Van Den Bos C. Quality of life, self‐esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology, 2004; 13: 867–881.
    1. Stam H, Grootenhuis M, Caron H, Last B. Quality of life and current coping in young adult survivors of childhood cancer: positive expectations about the further course of the disease were correlated with better quality of life. Psychooncology, 2006; 15: 31–43.
    1. Lewis P, Jordens C, Mooney‐Somers J, Smith K, Kerridge I. Growing up with cancer. Accommodating the effects of cancer into young people's social lives. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 2013; 30: 311–319.
    1. Osborn T. The psychosocial impact of parental cancer on children and adolescents: a systematic review. Psychooncology, 2007; 16: 101–126.
    1. Visser A, Huizinga GA, Van der Graaf W, Hoekstra HJ, Hoekstra‐Weebers JEHM. The impact of parental cancer on children and the family: a review of the literature. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2004; 30: 683–694.
    1. Huizinga GA, Visser A, Van der Graaf W et al Stress response symptoms in adolescent and young adult children of parents diagnosed with cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 2005; 41: 288–295.
    1. Krattenmacher T, Kuhne F, Ernset J, Bergelt C, Romer G, Moller B. Parental cancer: factors associated with children's psychosocial adjustment – a systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2012; 72: 344–356.
    1. Corey A, Haase J, Azzouz F, Monahan P. Social support and symptom distress in adolescents/young adults with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 2008; 25: 275–284.
    1. Kato PM, Cole SW, Bradlyn AS, Hollock BH. A video game improves behavioural outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomised trial. Pediatrics, 2008; 122: e305–e317.
    1. Roberts CS, Piper L, Denny J, Cuddeback G. A support group intervention to facilitate young adults’ adjustment to cancer. Health & Social Work, 1997; 22: 03607283.
    1. Kazak AE. Evidence‐based interventions for survivors of childhood cancer and their families. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2004; 30: 29–39.
    1. Prior S. Young people's process of engagement in school counselling. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2012; 12: 233–240.
    1. Chandra A, Minkovitz CS. Stigma starts early: gender differences in teen willingness to use mental health services. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2006; 38: 754, e751–754, e758.
    1. Fox CL, Butler I. ‘If you don't want to tell anyone else you can tell her’: young people's views on school counselling. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 2007; 35: 97–114.
    1. Barak A, Hen L, Boniel‐Nissim M, Shapira N. A comprehensive review and a meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of Internet‐based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 2008; 26: 109–160.
    1. Chester A, Glass CA. Online counselling: a descriptive analysis of therapy services on the Internet. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 2006; 34: 1145–1160.
    1. Maheu MM, Gordon BL. Counseling and therapy on the Internet. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2000; 31: 484–489.
    1. Borzekowski D, Rickert V. Adolescent cybersurfing for health information, a new resource that crosses barriers. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 2001; 155: 813–817.
    1. Hanley T. Understanding the online therapeutic alliance through the eyes of adolescent service users. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2012; 12: 35–43.
    1. King R, Bambling M, Reid W, Thomas L. Telephone and online counseling for young people: a naturalistic comparison of session outcome, session impact and therapeutic alliance. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2006; 6: 175–181.
    1. Richards D, Vigano N. Online counseling: a narrative and critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2013; 69: 994–1011.
    1. Kauer SD, Mangan C, Sanci L. Do online mental health services improve help‐seeking for young people? A systematic review Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014; 16: e66.
    1. Bambling M, King R, Reid W, Wegner K. Online counselling: the experience of counsellors providing synchronous single‐session counselling to young people. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2008; 8: 110–116.
    1. Finn J, Barak A. A descriptive study of e‐counsellor attitudes, ethics, and practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2010; 10: 268–277.
    1. British Psychological Society . Ethics Guidelines for Internet‐Mediated Research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 2013. Available from: .
    1. Baker KD, Ray M. Online counseling: the good, the bad, and the possibilities. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 2011; 24: 341–346.
    1. Bond T. Ethical guidelines for researching counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2014; 4: 10–19.
    1. Anthony K, Nagel DM, Goss S (eds). The Use of Technology in Mental Health: Applications, Ethics and Practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 2010.
    1. Skelton T. Research with children and young people: exploring the tensions between ethics, competence and participation. Children's Geographies, 2008; 6: 21–36.
    1. Valentine G, Bulter R, Skelton T. The ethical and methodological complexities of doing research with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Ethics, Place & Environment, 2001; 4: 119–125.
    1. O'Donoghue JL, Kirshner B, McLaughlin M. Introduction: moving youth participation forward. New Directions for Youth Development, 2002; 96: 15–26.
    1. London JK, Zimmerman K, Erbstein N. Youth‐led research and evaluation: tools for youth, organisational, and community development. New Directions for Evaluation, 2003; 98: 33–45.
    1. O'Donoghue J, Kirshner B, McLaughlin M. Youth‐adult research collaborations: bringing youth voice and development to the research process In: Mahoney J, Eccles J, Larson R. (eds) After‐School Activities: Contexts of Development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004: 131–156.
    1. Roth J, Brooks‐Gunn J, Murray L. Promoting health adolescences: synthesis of youth development program evaluations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1998; 8: 423–459.
    1. Kime N, McKenna J, Webster L. Young people's participation in the development of a self‐care intervention, a multi‐site formative research study. Health Education Research, 2013; 28: 552–562.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006; 3: 77–101.
    1. Mychasiuk R, Benzies K. Facebook: an effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. Child: Care, Health and Development, 2012; 38: 753–756.
    1. Bozlak CT, Kelley MA. Youth participation in a community campaign to pass a clean indoor air ordinance. Health Promotion Practice, 2010; 11: 530–540.
    1. Fleming F. Young people's involvement in research: still a long way to go? Qualitative Social Work, 2011; 10: 207–223.
    1. Dowling MJ, Rickwood DJ. Experiences of counsellors providing online chat counselling to young people. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 2014; 24: 183–196.
    1. Skinner AE, Latchford G. Attitudes to counselling via the Internet: a comparison between in‐person counselling clients and Internet support group users. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2006; 6: 158–163.
    1. Valentine G. Being seen and heard? The ethical complexities of working with children and young people at home and at school. Ethics, Place & Environment, 1999; 2: 141–155.
    1. Sweeney GM, Donovan CL, March S, Laurenson SD. Logging into therapy: parent attitudes and intentions to use computer‐based therapies for youth mental health. Internet Interventions, 2015; 2: 437–445.
    1. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help‐seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 2010; 10: 113.
    1. Patel VM, Flisher AJ, Hetrick S, McGorry P. Mental health of young people: a global public‐health challenge. The Lancet, 2007; 9659: 1302–1313.
    1. Caldon LM, Collins KA, Reed MW et al Clinicians’ concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision‐making. Health Expectations, 2011; 14: 133–146.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere