Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy

Richard Buus, Ivana Sestak, Ralf Kronenwett, Carsten Denkert, Peter Dubsky, Kristin Krappmann, Marsel Scheer, Christoph Petry, Jack Cuzick, Mitch Dowsett, Richard Buus, Ivana Sestak, Ralf Kronenwett, Carsten Denkert, Peter Dubsky, Kristin Krappmann, Marsel Scheer, Christoph Petry, Jack Cuzick, Mitch Dowsett

Abstract

Background: Estimating distant recurrence (DR) risk among women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer helps decisions on using adjuvant chemotherapy. The 21-gene Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) is widely used for this. EndoPredict (EPclin) is an alternative test combining prognostic information from an eight-gene signature (EP score) with tumor size and nodal status. We compared the prognostic information provided by RS and EPclin for 10-year DR risk.

Methods: We used likelihood ratio χ² and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to compare prognostic information provided by EP, EPclin, RS, and the clinical treatment score (CTS) of clinicopathologic parameters in 928 patients with ER+ disease treated with five years' anastrozole or tamoxifen. Comparisons were made for early (0-5 years) and late (5-10 years) DR according to nodal status. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In the overall population, EP and EPclin provided substantially more prognostic information than RS (LRχ(2): EP = 49.3; LRχ(2): EPclin = 139.3; LRχ(2): RS = 29.1), with greater differences in late DR and in node-positive patients. EP and EPclin remained statistically significantly prognostic when adjusted for RS (ΔLRχ(2): EP+RS vs RS = 20.2; ΔLRχ(2): EPclin+RS vs RS = 113.8). Using predefined cut-offs, EPclin and RS identified 58.8% and 61.7% patients as low risk, with hazard ratios for non-low vs low risk of 5.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.94 to 9.11) and 2.73 (95% CI = 1.91 to 3.89), respectively.

Conclusions: EP and EPclin were highly prognostic for DR in endocrine-treated patients with ER+, HER2-negative disease. EPclin provided more prognostic information than RS. This was partly but not entirely because of EPclin integrating molecular data with nodal status and tumor size.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram of the availability of samples for analysis from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. ATAC = Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination; ER = estrogen receptor; PgR = progesterone receptor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier estimates for 10-year distant recurrence according to EP, EPclin, and recurrence score, split into tertiles in all patients. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and tested for equality using the log-rank test. The numbers of patients at risk in each group at various time points are given below each graph. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence interval; EP = EndoPredict; HR = hazard ratio; RS = recurrence score.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier plots for 10-year distant recurrence according to EP, EPclin, and recurrence score in all patients, stratified by cut-offs used for clinical decision-making. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and tested for equality using the log-rank test. The numbers of patients at risk in each group at various time points are given below each graph. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence interval; EP = EndoPredict; HR = hazard ratio; RS = recurrence score.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier plot of risk groups classified by EPclin and recurrence score for 10-year distant recurrence in all patients. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and tested for equality using the log-rank test. The numbers of patients at risk in each group at various time points are given below each graph. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence interval; EP = EndoPredict; HR = hazard ratio; RS = recurrence score.

References

    1. Dowsett M, Forbes JF, Bradley R, et al. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386(10001):1341–1352.
    1. Dowsett M, Goldhirsch A, Hayes DF, et al. International Web-based consultation on priorities for translational breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(6):R81.
    1. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817–2826.
    1. Nielsen TO, Parker JS, Leung S, et al. A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(21):5222–5232.
    1. Jerevall PL, Ma XJ, Li H, et al. Prognostic utility of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index in early-stage breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(11):1762–1769.
    1. Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(32):4273–4278.
    1. Sestak I, Dowsett M, Zabaglo L, et al. Factors predicting late recurrence for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(19):1504–1511.
    1. Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R, et al. A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(18):6012–6020.
    1. Denkert C, Kronenwett R, Schlake W, et al. Decentral gene expression analysis for ER+/Her2- breast cancer: results of a proficiency testing program for the EndoPredict assay. Virchows Arch. 2012;460(3):251–259.
    1. Dubsky P, Brase JC, Jakesz R, et al. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(12):2959–2964.
    1. Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al. Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1829–1834.
    1. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E, et al. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(22):2783–2790.
    1. Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J, et al. Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):1067–1076.
    1. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(12):1135–1141.
    1. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Buus R, et al. Estrogen Receptor Expression in 21-Gene Recurrence Score Predicts Increased Late Recurrence for Estrogen-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(12):2763–2770.
    1. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2005–2014.
    1. Tang G, Cuzick J, Costantino JP, et al. Risk of recurrence and chemotherapy benefit for patients with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: recurrence score alone and integrated with pathologic and clinical factors. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(33):4365–4372.
    1. Genomic Health Inc. Oncotype DX® tools for Genomic Education. . Accessed December 23, 2015.
    1. Cuzick J. Forest plots and the interpretation of subgroups. Lancet. 2005;365(9467):1308.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere