Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to reduce violence and increase condom use in intimate partnerships among female sex workers: cluster randomised controlled trial in Karnataka, India

Prakash Javalkar, Lucy Platt, Ravi Prakash, Tara S Beattie, Martine Collumbien, Mitzy Gafos, Satyanarayana Ramanaik, Calum Davey, Rachel Jewkes, Charlotte Watts, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Raghavendra Thalinja, Kavitha Dl, Shajy Isac, Lori Heise, Prakash Javalkar, Lucy Platt, Ravi Prakash, Tara S Beattie, Martine Collumbien, Mitzy Gafos, Satyanarayana Ramanaik, Calum Davey, Rachel Jewkes, Charlotte Watts, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Raghavendra Thalinja, Kavitha Dl, Shajy Isac, Lori Heise

Abstract

Introduction: Samvedana Plus is a multilevel intervention working with sex workers, their intimate partners (IPs) and communities to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) and to increase condom use within intimate relationships of sex workers in Northern Karnataka, India.

Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial in 47 villages. Female sex workers with IPs in the last 6 months were eligible for baseline (2014), midline (2016) and endline (2017) surveys. 24 villages were randomised to Samvedana Plus and 23 to a wait-list control. Primary outcomes among sex workers included experience of physical and/or sexual IPV or severe physical/sexual IPV in the last 6 months and consistent condom use with their IP in past 30 days. Analyses adjusted for clustering and baseline cluster-level means of outcomes.

Result: Baseline (n=620) imbalance was observed with respect to age (33.9 vs 35.2) and IPV (31.4% vs 45.0%). No differences in physical/sexual IPV (8.1% vs 9.0%), severe physical/sexual IPV (6.9% vs 8.7%) or consistent condom use with IPs (62.5% vs 57.3%) were observed by trial arm at end line (n=547). Samvedana Plus was associated with decreased acceptance of IPV (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.94, p=0.025), increased awareness of self-protection strategies (AOR=1.73, 95% CI=1.04-2.89, p=0.035) and solidarity of sex workers around issues of IPV (AOR=1.69, 95% CI=1.02-2.82, p=0.042). We observed an increase in IPV between baseline (25.9%) and midline (63.5%) among women in Samvedana Plus villages but lower in comparison villages (41.8%-44.3%) and a sharp decrease at end line in both arms (~8%).

Conclusion: We found no evidence that Samvedana Plus reduced IPV or increased condom use, but it may impact acceptance of IPV, increase knowledge of self-protection strategies and increase sex worker solidarity. Inconsistencies in reported IPV undermined the ability of the trial to assess effectiveness.

Trial registration number: NCT02807259.

Keywords: cluster randomised controlled trial; intimate partner violence; sex worker.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile. FSW, female sex worker; IPV, intimate partner violence; pop, population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of primary outcome by intervention arm and survey round. IPV, intimate partner violence.

References

    1. Devries KM, Mak JYT, García-Moreno C, et al. . The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science 2013;340:1527–8. 10.1126/science.1240937
    1. Reed E, Erausquin JT, Groves AK, et al. . Client-perpetrated and husband-perpetrated violence among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: HIV/STI risk across personal and work contexts. Sex Transm Infect 2016;92:424–9. 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052162
    1. Ulibarri MD, Strathdee SA, Lozada R, et al. . Intimate partner violence among female sex workers in two Mexico-U.S. border cities: partner characteristics and HIV Risk-behaviors as correlates of abuse. Psychol Trauma 2010;2:318–25. 10.1037/a0017500
    1. Pack AP, L'engle K, Mwarogo P, et al. . Intimate partner violence against female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya. Cult Health Sex 2013. doi:10.1080/13691058.2013.857046. [Epub ahead of print: 11 Dec 2013].
    1. Platt L, Grenfell P, Bonell C, et al. . Risk of sexually transmitted infections and violence among indoor-working female sex workers in London: the effect of migration from eastern Europe. Sex Transm Infect 2011;87:377–84. 10.1136/sti.2011.049544
    1. Argento E, Muldoon KA, Duff P, et al. . High prevalence and partner correlates of physical and sexual violence by intimate partners among street and off-street sex workers. PLoS One 2014;9:e102129 10.1371/journal.pone.0102129
    1. El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Wada T, et al. . Correlates of partner violence among female street-based sex workers: substance abuse, history of childhood abuse, and HIV risks. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2001;15:41–51. 10.1089/108729101460092
    1. Panchanadeswaran S, Johnson SC, Sivaram S, et al. . Intimate partner violence is as important as client violence in increasing street-based female sex workers' vulnerability to HIV in India. Int J Drug Policy 2008;19:106–12. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.013
    1. Beksinska A, Prakash R, Isac S, et al. . Violence experience by perpetrator and associations with HIV/STI risk and infection: a cross-sectional study among female sex workers in Karnataka, South India. BMJ Open. In Press2018;8:e021389 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021389
    1. Deering KN, Amin A, Shoveller J, et al. . A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. Am J Public Health 2014;104:e42–54. 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909
    1. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet 2002;359:1331–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
    1. Edwards VJ, Black MC, Dhingra S, et al. . Physical and sexual intimate partner violence and reported serious psychological distress in the 2007 BRFSS. Int J Public Health 2009;54 Suppl 1:37–42. 10.1007/s00038-009-0005-2
    1. Li Y, Marshall CM, Rees HC, et al. . Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2014;17:18845 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18845
    1. Blanchard JF, O’Neil J, Ramesh BM, et al. . Understanding the social and cultural contexts of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: implications for prevention of HIV infection. J Infect Dis 2005;191:S139–46. 10.1086/425273
    1. Karnataka Health Promotion Trust Mapping of high risk groups in Karnataka. Bangalore, India: Karnataka Health Promotion Trust, 2012.
    1. Javalkar P, Platt L, Prakash R, et al. . What determines violence among female sex workers in an intimate partner relationship? findings from North Karnataka, South India. BMC Public Health 2019;19:350 10.1186/s12889-019-6673-9
    1. Blanchard AK, Nair SG, Bruce SG, et al. . A community-based qualitative study on the experience and understandings of intimate partner violence and HIV vulnerability from the perspectives of female sex workers and male intimate partners in North Karnataka state, India. BMC Womens Health 2018;18:66 10.1186/s12905-018-0554-8
    1. Heise L. What works to prevent partner violence: an evidence overview. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2011.
    1. Parcesepe AM, L′Engle KL, Martin SL, et al. . The impact of an alcohol harm reduction intervention on interpersonal violence and engagement in sex work among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya: results from a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016;161:21–8. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.037
    1. Carlson CE, Chen J, Chang M, et al. . Reducing intimate and paying partner violence against women who exchange sex in Mongolia: results from a randomized clinical trial. J Interpers Violence 2012;27:1911–31. 10.1177/0886260511431439
    1. Ngugi EN, Chakkalackal M, Sharma A, et al. . Sustained changes in sexual behavior by female sex workers after completion of a randomized HIV prevention trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007;45:588–94. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180f616db
    1. Patterson TL, Mausbach B, Lozada R, et al. . Efficacy of a brief behavioral intervention to promote condom use among female sex workers in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Am J Public Health 2008;98:2051–7. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130096
    1. Hoke TH, Feldblum PJ, Damme KV, et al. . Randomised controlled trial of alternative male and female condom promotion strategies targeting sex workers in Madagascar. Sex Transm Infect;83:448–53. 10.1136/sti.2006.024612
    1. World Health Organisation, United Nations Population Fund, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Global Network of Sex Work Projects, World Bank Implementing comprehensive HIV/STI programmes with sex workers: practical approaches from collaborative interventions. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2013.
    1. Syvertsen JL, Robertson AM, Abramovitz D, et al. . Study protocol for the recruitment of female sex workers and their non-commercial partners into couple-based HIV research. BMC Public Health 2012;12:136 10.1186/1471-2458-12-136
    1. Beattie TSH, Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh BM, et al. . Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, South India: impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. BMC Public Health 2010;10:476 10.1186/1471-2458-10-476
    1. Beattie TS, Isac S, Bhattacharjee P, et al. . Reducing violence and increasing condom use in the intimate partnerships of female sex workers: study protocol for Samvedana plus, a cluster randomised controlled trial in Karnataka state, South India. BMC Public Health 2016;16:660 10.1186/s12889-016-3356-7
    1. Schraiber LB, Latorre MdoRDO, França I, et al. . Validity of the who VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women. Rev Saude Publica 2010;44:658–66. 10.1590/s0034-89102010000400009
    1. Collumbien M, Ramanaik S, Kavitha DL, et al. . Desire, doubt, denial and deception: undermining the viability and evaluation of the Samvedana plus intervention Ro reduce intimate partner violence among sex workers in Karnataka, South India. Under review 2018.
    1. Vyas S, Watts C. How does economic empowerment affect women's risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. J Int Dev 2009;21:577–602. 10.1002/jid.1500
    1. Rocca CH, Rathod S, Falle T, et al. . Challenging assumptions about women's empowerment: social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:577–85. 10.1093/ije/dyn226
    1. Schuler SR, Hashemi SM, Riley AP, et al. . Credit programs, patriarchy and men's violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:1729–42. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00068-8
    1. Kabeer N. Randomized control trials and qualitative evaluations of a multifaceted programme for women in extreme poverty: empirical findings and methodological reflections. J Human Dev Capabil 2019;20:197–217. 10.1080/19452829.2018.1536696
    1. Bhattacharjee P, Prakash R, Pillai P, et al. . Understanding the role of peer group membership in reducing HIV-related risk and vulnerability among female sex workers in Karnataka, India. AIDS Care 2013;25:S46–54. 10.1080/09540121.2012.736607
    1. Wagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, et al. . Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health 2015;3:e23–33. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4
    1. Murray L, Moreno L, Rosario S, et al. . The role of relationship intimacy in consistent condom use among female sex workers and their regular paying partners in the Dominican Republic. AIDS Behav 2007;11:463–70. 10.1007/s10461-006-9184-5
    1. Bhattacharjee P, Campbell L, Thalinja R, et al. . Understanding the relationship between female sex workers and their intimate partners: lessons and initial findings from participatory research in North Karnataka, South India. Health Educ Behav 2018;45:824–35. 10.1177/1090198118763934
    1. Kerrigan D, Kennedy CE, Morgan-Thomas R, et al. . A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up. The Lancet 2015;385:172–85. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60973-9
    1. Hail-Jares K, Chang RCF, Choi S, et al. . Intimate-Partner and Client-Initiated violence among female street-based sex workers in China: does a support network help? PLoS One 2015;10:e0139161 10.1371/journal.pone.0139161
    1. Cornish F, Ghosh R. The necessary contradictions of ‘community-led’ health promotion: A case study of HIV prevention in an Indian red light district. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:496–507. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.009
    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster Randomised Trials In: Hall C, ed Chapman and Hall, 2009.
    1. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, et al. . Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337 10.1136/bmj.a506
    1. Abramsky T, Devries K, Kiss L, et al. . Findings from the Sasa! study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Med 2014;12:122 10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere