Group penalized generalized estimating equation for correlated event-related potentials and biomarker selection

Ye Lin, Jianhui Zhou, Swapna Kumar, Wanze Xie, Sarah K G Jensen, Rashidul Haque, Charles A Nelson, William A Petri Jr, Jennie Z Ma, Ye Lin, Jianhui Zhou, Swapna Kumar, Wanze Xie, Sarah K G Jensen, Rashidul Haque, Charles A Nelson, William A Petri Jr, Jennie Z Ma

Abstract

Background: Event-related potentials (ERP) data are widely used in brain studies that measure brain responses to specific stimuli using electroencephalogram (EEG) with multiple electrodes. Previous ERP data analyses haven't accounted for the structured correlation among observations in ERP data from multiple electrodes, and therefore ignored the electrode-specific information and variation among the electrodes on the scalp. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of early adversity on brain connectivity by identifying risk factors and early-stage biomarkers associated with the ERP responses while properly accounting for structured correlation.

Methods: In this study, we extend a penalized generalized estimating equation (PGEE) method to accommodate structured correlation of ERPs that accounts for electrode-specific data and to enable group selection, such that grouped covariates can be evaluated together for their association with brain development in a birth cohort of urban-dwelling Bangladeshi children. The primary ERP responses of interest in our study are N290 amplitude and the difference in N290 amplitude.

Results: The selected early-stage biomarkers associated with the N290 responses are representatives of enteric inflammation (days of diarrhea, MIP1b, retinol binding protein (RBP), Zinc, myeloperoxidase (MPO), calprotectin, and neopterin), systemic inflammation (IL-5, IL-10, ferritin, C Reactive Protein (CRP)), socioeconomic status (household expenditure), maternal health (mother height) and sanitation (water treatment).

Conclusions: Our proposed group penalized GEE estimator with structured correlation matrix can properly model the complex ERP data and simultaneously identify informative biomarkers associated with such brain connectivity. The selected early-stage biomarkers offer a potential explanation for the adversity of neurocognitive development in low-income countries and facilitate early identification of infants at risk, as well as potential pathways for intervention.

Trial registration: The related clinical study was retrospectively registered with https://doi.org/ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT01375647, on June 3, 2011.

Keywords: Correlated data; Event-related potentials; Penalized generalized estimating equations (GEE); Structured correlation matrix; Variable selection.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Boxplot of N290 amplitude under oddball/standard condition. X-axis represents 13 electrodes on the occipital regions of interest (see the supplemental figure for exact electrode locations). Y-axis shows the amplitude in uV
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation plot of N290 amplitude under oddball/standard condition

References

    1. Beres AM. Time is of the essence: A review of electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in language research. Appl Psychophys Biofeedback. 2017;42(4):247–55.
    1. Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge: MIT press; 2014.
    1. Woodman GF. A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72(8):2031–46.
    1. Halit H, De Haan M, Johnson M. Cortical specialisation for face processing: face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3-and 12-month-old infants. Neuroimage. 2003;19(3):1180–93.
    1. Xie W, McCormick SA, Westerlund A, Bowman LC, Nelson CA. Neural correlates of facial emotion processing in infancy. Dev Sci. 2019;22(3):12758.
    1. Xie W, Kumar S, Kakon SH, Haque R, Petri WA, Nelson CA. Chronic inflammation is associated with neural responses to faces in Bangladeshi children. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116110.
    1. Sur S, Sinha V. Event-related potential: An overview. Ind Psychiatry J. 2009;18(1):70.
    1. Lage-Castellanos A, Martínez-Montes E, Hernández-Cabrera JA, Galán L. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(1):63–74.
    1. Causeur D, Chu M-C, Hsieh S, Sheu C-F. A factor-adjusted multiple testing procedure for ERP data analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(3):635–43.
    1. Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Schwarzenau P, Hohnsbein J. Methods for the quantification and statistical testing of ERP differences across conditions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1998;30(1):103–9.
    1. Vossen H, Van Breukelen G, Hermens H, Van Os J, Lousberg R. More potential in statistical analyses of event-related potentials: A mixed regression approach. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011;20(3):56–68.
    1. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1996;58(1):267–88.
    1. Fan J, Li R. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(945):1348–60.
    1. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2005;67(2):301–20.
    1. Zou H. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(476):1418–29.
    1. Fan J, Li R. New estimation and model selection procedures for semiparametric modeling in longitudinal data analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 2004;99(467):710–23.
    1. Ni X, Zhang D, Zhang HH. Variable selection for semiparametric mixed models in longitudinal studies. Biometrics. 2010;66(1):79–88.
    1. Wang L, Zhou J, Qu A. Penalized generalized estimating equations for high-dimensional longitudinal data analysis. Biometrics. 2012;68(2):353–60.
    1. Naylor C, Lu M, Haque R, Mondal D, Buonomo E, Nayak U, Mychaleckyj JC, Kirkpatrick B, Colgate R, Carmolli M, et al. Environmental enteropathy, oral vaccine failure and growth faltering in infants in Bangladesh. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(11):1759–66.
    1. Lu M, Zhou J, Naylor C, Kirkpatrick BD, Haque R, Petri WA, Ma JZ. Application of penalized linear regression methods to the selection of environmental enteropathy biomarkers. Biomarker Res. 2017;5(1):9.
    1. Fan J, Lv J. A selective overview of variable selection in high dimensional feature space. Stat Sinica. 2010;20(1):101.
    1. Kirkpatrick BD, Colgate ER, Mychaleckyj JC, Haque R, Dickson DM, Carmolli MP, Nayak U, Taniuchi M, Naylor C, Qadri F, et al. The “Performance of Rotavirus and Oral Polio Vaccines in Developing Countries”(PROVIDE) study: description of methods of an interventional study designed to explore complex biologic problems. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(4):744–51.
    1. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Niu F, Donowitz JR, Haque R, Petri WA, Ma JZ. Characterizing early child growth patterns of height-for-age in an urban slum cohort of Bangladesh with functional principal component analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):84.
    1. Reynolds GD, Richards JE. Familiarization, attention, and recognition memory in infancy: an event-related potential and cortical source localization study. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):598.
    1. Richards JE. Attention affects the recognition of briefly presented visual stimuli in infants: An ERP study. Dev Sci. 2003;6(3):312–28.
    1. Thomas KM, Nelson CA. Age-related changes in the electrophysiological response to visual stimulus novelty: A topographical approach. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;98(4):294–308.
    1. Guy MW, Zieber N, Richards JE. The cortical development of specialized face processing in infancy. Child Dev. 2016;87(5):1581–600.
    1. Halit H, Csibra G, Volein A, Johnson MH. Face-sensitive cortical processing in early infancy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004;45(7):1228–34.
    1. Yuan M, Lin Y. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2006;68(1):49–67.
    1. Jones RH. Bayesian information criterion for longitudinal and clustered data. Stat Med. 2011;30(25):3050–6.
    1. de Haan M, Nelson CA. Recognition of the mother’s face by six-month-old infants: A neurobehavioral study. Child Dev. 1997;68(2):187–210.
    1. Reynolds GD, Richards JE. Infant visual attention and stimulus repetition effects on object recognition. Child Dev. 2019;90(4):1027–42.
    1. Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2009;2(1):183–202.
    1. Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J, et al. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends® in Mach Learn. 2011;3(1):1–122.
    1. Jiang NM, Tofail F, Ma JZ, Haque R, Kirkpatrick B, Nelson III CA, Petri Jr WA. Early life inflammation and neurodevelopmental outcome in Bangladeshi infants growing up in adversity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(3):974–9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere