Identification of mutations associated with peroxisome-to-mitochondrion mistargeting of alanine/glyoxylate aminotransferase in primary hyperoxaluria type 1

P E Purdue, Y Takada, C J Danpure, P E Purdue, Y Takada, C J Danpure

Abstract

We have previously shown that in some patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), disease is associated with mistargeting of the normally peroxisomal enzyme alanine/glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT) to mitochondria (Danpure, C.J., P.J. Cooper, P.J. Wise, and P.R. Jennings. J. Cell Biol. 108:1345-1352). We have synthesized, amplified, cloned, and sequenced AGT cDNA from a PH1 patient with mitochondrial AGT (mAGT). This identified three point mutations that cause amino acid substitutions in the predicted AGT protein sequence. Using PCR and allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization, a range of PH1 patients and controls were screened for these mutations. This revealed that all eight PH1 patients with mAGT carried at least one allele with the same three mutations. Two were homozygous for this allele and six were heterozygous. In at least three of the heterozygotes, it appeared that only the mutant allele was expressed. All three mutations were absent from PH1 patients lacking mAGT. One mutation encoding a Gly----Arg substitution at residue 170 was not found in any of the control individuals. However, the other two mutations, encoding Pro----Leu and Ile----Met substitutions at residues 11 and 340, respectively, cosegregated in the normal population at an allelic frequency of 5-10%. In an individual homozygous for this allele (substitutions at residues 11 and 340) only a small proportion of AGT appeared to be rerouted to mitochondria. It is suggested that the substitution at residue 11 generates an amphiphilic alpha-helix with characteristics similar to recognized mitochondrial targeting sequences, the full functional expression of which is dependent upon coexpression of the substitution at residue 170, which may induce defective peroxisomal import.

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 1988 Apr 5;263(10):4509-11
    1. EMBO J. 1990 Jan;9(1):85-90
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982 Sep 16;108(1):153-7
    1. Anal Biochem. 1984 Feb;137(1):266-7
    1. Gene. 1980 Aug;10(3):249-59
    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1979 Sep;196(2):645-7
    1. Biochem J. 1979 Sep 15;182(3):877-9
    1. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1979 Jul;360(7):919-27
    1. Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):180-2
    1. Biochemistry. 1979 Nov 27;18(24):5294-9
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jun;69(6):1408-12
    1. Biochemistry. 1974 Jan 15;13(2):222-45
    1. Biophys J. 1967 Mar;7(2):121-35
    1. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jun 5;201(3):601-19
    1. J Cell Biol. 1989 May;108(5):1657-64
    1. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;9(1):83-91
    1. EMBO J. 1988 Apr;7(4):1167-73
    1. FEBS Lett. 1986 May 26;201(1):20-4
    1. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Nov 2;168(3):537-42
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988 Sep;75(3):315-22
    1. J Histochem Cytochem. 1988 Oct;36(10):1285-94
    1. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1345-52
    1. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;7(2):725-37
    1. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1361-6
    1. FEBS Lett. 1987 Sep 28;222(1):17-20
    1. J Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;105(6 Pt 2):2923-31
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 May 5;866(4):179-203
    1. J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):897-905
    1. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1335-42
    1. DNA. 1985 Feb;4(1):39-49
    1. Trends Biochem Sci. 1988 Jul;13(7):255-60
    1. J Biol Chem. 1989 Dec 5;264(34):20206-15
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Jun 1;1008(1):1-13
    1. Eur J Biochem. 1987 May 15;165(1):1-6
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(6):1585-8
    1. Biochem J. 1990 Jun 1;268(2):517-20

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere