Use of effective family planning methods and frequency of sex among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected African women

Jim Aizire, Sufia Dadabhai, Frank Taulo, Bonus Makanani, Luis Gadama, Jin Sun, Amy Tsui, Taha E Taha, Jim Aizire, Sufia Dadabhai, Frank Taulo, Bonus Makanani, Luis Gadama, Jin Sun, Amy Tsui, Taha E Taha

Abstract

Background: Frequency of sex, contraceptive use and HIV infection are key determinants of fertility. Use of an effective family planning (EFP) method (injectable, oral, intra-uterine contraceptive device (IUCD), or Norplant) potentially eliminates women's concerns of unintended pregnancy. We report the association between EFP and frequency of sex among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected non-pregnant African women.

Methods: Prospective fertility intentions study nested within a phase 3 randomized double-masked placebo-controlled trial (2003-2005) to treat genital tract infections in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected non-pregnant women. Enrollment of study participants was stratified by HIV infection status. Data on demographics, family planning and sexual history were obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Chi square and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Generalized Estimating Equations method was used to estimate relative risk (RR) of frequent sex (≥ 2 acts/week) among users of different EFP methods (injectable, oral, implant or intra-uterine contraceptive device).

Results: After adjusting for age, current health status, and fertility intentions, EFP use was significantly associated with frequent sex among HIV-infected women (RR 1.32; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.14-1.52); this association was not statistically significant among HIV-uninfected women (RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.96-1.24). Fertility intentions among HIV-infected, and education among HIV-uninfected womenwere independent predictors of sex frequency.

Conclusion: These data suggest that the association between EFP use and frequency of sex among women varies by HIV infection status. Service-delivery of diverse EFP methods should be integrated within HIV counseling, testing and treatment facilities.

Trial registration: Registration number NCT00140764 under the clinicaltrials.gov, first Posted: September 1, 2005, last Update Posted: August 10, 2011.

Keywords: Contraception; HIV/AIDS; Sexual behavior; Sub-Saharan Africa.

Conflict of interest statement

The protocol was approved by the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (reference #P.00/01/119R), in Malawi, and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (reference #H.34.01.05.21.A2) in the USA. Prior to study enrolment, written informed consent for study participation was obtained from all eligible research volunteers.As part of the enrolment criteria, all study participants provided written informed consent for study participation, and for data dissemination of study findings including through presentation at conferences and publications.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study visit (0) or entry is the enrollment or baseline visit. Effective Family planning methods which were based on self-reported contraceptive use at study entry and during study follow-up include Injectable, oral, Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD), and Norplant and all the other family planning methods are classified as ‘other’; self-report sexual frequency assessed at each study visit, was defined as the proportion of women who self-reported 2 or more sexual encounters per week. HIV-infection status was based on HIV test results at study entry (enrollment)

References

    1. Mohamad Al-Ali B, Shamloul R, Ramsauer J, Bella AJ, Scrinzi U, Treu T, et al. The effect of vasectomy on the sexual life of couples. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2239–2242. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12567.
    1. Fataneh G, Marjan MH, Nasrin R, Taraneh T. Sexual function in Iranian women using different methods of contraception. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22:3016–3023. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12289.
    1. Davis AR, Castano P. Oral Contraceptives and libido in women. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2004;15:297–320.
    1. Wiebe ER, Brotto LA, MacKay J. Characteristics of women who experience mood and sexual side effects with use of hormonal contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33:1234–1240. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35108-8.
    1. Wallwiener M, Wallwiener LM, Seeger H, Mueck AO, Zipfel S, Bitzer J, et al. Effects of sex hormones in oral contraceptives on the female sexual function score: a study in German female medical students. Contraception. 2010;82:155–159. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.022.
    1. Strufaldi R, Pompei LM, Steiner ML, Cunha EP, Ferreira JAS, Peixoto S, et al. Effects of two combined hormonal contraceptives with the same composition and different doses on female sexual function and plasma androgen levels. Contraception. 2010;82:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.016.
    1. Ross A, Van der Paal L, Lubega R, Mayanja BN, Shafer LA, Whitworth J. HIV-1 disease progression and fertility: the incidence of recognized pregnancy and pregnancy outcome in Uganda. AIDS. 2004;18:799–804. 10.1097/00002030-200403260-00012.
    1. De Vincenzi I, Jadand C, Couturier E, Brunet J-B, Gallais H, Gastaut J-A, et al. Pregnancy and contraception in a French cohort of HIV-infected women. AIDS. 1997;11:333–338. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199703110-00011.
    1. Homsy J, Bunnell R, Moore D, King R, Malamba S, Nakityo R, et al. Reproductive intentions and outcomes among women on antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2009;4 10.1371/journal.pone.0004149.
    1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs PDUN. Trends in contraceptive use worldwide 2015. Contraception. 2015:1–70. 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.029.
    1. UNAIDS. Women need access to dual protection — effective contraceptives and HIV prevention options 2012. . Accessed 20 Sept 2016.
    1. UNAIDS. HIV/AIDS Fact sheet 2016 2016:8. Accessed Sept 2016.
    1. Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, Biddlecom A. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381:1642–1652. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62204-1.
    1. Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45:151–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x.
    1. Darroch JE, Sedgh G, Ball H. Contraceptive Technologies: Responding to Women’s Needs. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2011. .
    1. Darroch JE, Singh S. Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet. 2013;381:1756–1762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60597-8.
    1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Intended HR. Unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45:301–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x.
    1. Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W, Kowal D, Policar M. Contracepteive efficacy. Contracept Technol Twent Revis Ed. 2011;9:Table 3-2 10.1001/archderm.1995.01690210094016.
    1. Ross J, Keesbury J, Hardee K. Trends in the contraceptive method mix in low- and middle-income countries: analysis using a new "average deviation" measure. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2015;3:34–55. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00199.
    1. Melorose J, Perroy R, Careas S. Demographic and health survey key indicators. Statew Agric L Use Baseline. 2015;1:55.
    1. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380:149–156. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6.
    1. Ahmed S, Li Q, Liu L, Tsui AO. Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: an analysis of 172 countries. Lancet. 2012;380:111–125. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60478-4.
    1. Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet. 2012;380:165–171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60827-7.
    1. Singh S, Darroch JE. Adding it up: costs and benefits of contraceptive services estimates for 2012. Guttmacher Inst United Nations Popul Fund (UNFPA) 2012;201:1–28.
    1. Who. PMTCT STraTegiC ViSion: Organization. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010. p. 40. .
    1. Malawi National AIDS Commission . Malawi AIDS Response Progress. 2015.
    1. Marston M, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, Hosegood V, Lutalo T, Mtenga B, Zaba B, et al. Reproductive intentions and family planning practices of pregnant HIV-infected Malawian women on antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One. 2015;212:1–8.
    1. Taha TE, Kumwenda NI, Kafulafula G, Makanani B, Nikhoma C, Chen S, et al. Intermittent intravaginal antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis in HIV-uninfected and -infected women: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS Clin Trials. 2007;2 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020010.
    1. Taulo F, Berry M, Tsui A, Makanani B, Kafulafula G, Li Q, et al. Fertility intentions of HIV-1 infected and uninfected women in Malawi: a longitudinal study. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:20–27. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9547-9.
    1. Bell S, Bishai D. Unmet need and sex: investigating the role of coital frequency in fertility control. Stud Fam Plan. n.d.;48:39–53. 10.1111/sifp.12012. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
    1. WHO. Hiv Prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care for key populations; 2016. p. 1–8. . (Accessed Oct 1, 2016).
    1. Fathalla MF, Sinding SW, Rosenfield A, Fathalla MMF. Sexual and reproductive health for all: a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368:2095–2100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69483-X.
    1. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet. 2004;363:1415–1421. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16098-4.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere