Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL): aerobic exercise and self-management early after stroke to increase daily physical activity-study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial

Avril Mansfield, Dina Brooks, Ada Tang, Denise Taylor, Elizabeth L Inness, Alex Kiss, Laura Middleton, Louis Biasin, Rebecca Fleck, Esmé French, Kathryn LeBlanc, Anthony Aqui, Cynthia Danells, Avril Mansfield, Dina Brooks, Ada Tang, Denise Taylor, Elizabeth L Inness, Alex Kiss, Laura Middleton, Louis Biasin, Rebecca Fleck, Esmé French, Kathryn LeBlanc, Anthony Aqui, Cynthia Danells

Abstract

Introduction: Physical exercise after stroke is essential for improving recovery and general health, and reducing future stroke risk. However, people with stroke are not sufficiently active on return to the community after rehabilitation. We developed the Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL) programme, which combines exercise with self-management strategies within rehabilitation to promote ongoing physical activity in the community after rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PROPEL on long-term participation in exercise after discharge from stroke rehabilitation. We hypothesise that individuals who complete PROPEL will be more likely to meet recommended frequency, duration and intensity of exercise compared with individuals who do not complete the programme up to 6 months post discharge from stroke rehabilitation.

Methods and analysis: Individuals undergoing outpatient stroke rehabilitation at one of six hospitals will be recruited (target n=192 total). A stepped-wedge design will be employed; that is, the PROPEL intervention (group exercise plus self-management) will be 'rolled out' to each site at a random time within the study period. Prior to roll-out of the PROPEL intervention, sites will complete the control intervention (group aerobic exercise only). Participation in physical activity for 6 months post discharge will be measured via activity and heart rate monitors, and standardised physical activity questionnaire. Adherence to exercise guidelines will be evaluated by (1) number of 'active minutes' per week (from the activity monitor), (2) amount of time per week when heart rate is within a target range (ie, 55%-80% of age-predicted maximum) and (3) amount of time per week completing 'moderate' or 'strenuous' physical activities (from the questionnaire). We will compare the proportion of active and inactive individuals at 6 months post intervention using mixed-model logistic regression, with fixed effects of time and phase and random effect of cluster (site).

Ethics and dissemination: To date, research ethics approval has been received from five of the six sites, with conditional approval granted by the sixth site. Results will be disseminated directly to study participants at the end of the trial, and to other stake holders via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number: NCT02951338; Pre-results.

Keywords: Behaviour Change; Exercise; Physical Activity; Physiotherapy; Stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AM holds a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MSH141983). DB holds a Canada Research Chair. AT is supported by a personnel award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation, Ontario Provincial Office (CS I 7468).

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention allocation schedule. G1, G2, and so on are the 6-week long group aerobic exercise (GAE) or Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL) groups. Each site should be able to complete eight groups per year; however, only seven groups will be completed in 2017 to allow for additional time at the start of the year to obtain research ethics approval, inter-institutional agreements and pilot implementation at all sites (see also figure 2). ‘0’ indicates that the site will complete GAE in that time period, whereas ‘1’ indicates that they will complete PROPEL. A simple randomisation procedure will be used to determine the time at which each site transitions from GAE to PROPEL. Sites will be allocated in order by drawing names from a hat; for example, the first site to be drawn will be site A, the second will be site B, and so on.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothetical timeline for one participant. The exact timing of inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation will vary for each participant. The submaximal aerobic capacity test is completed during inpatient rehabilitation. After this point, the participant could participate in individual or open-group aerobic exercise during inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation (while waiting to be enrolled in the study intervention). The closed-group study intervention (group aerobic exercise (GAE) only or Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL)) will likely start during outpatient rehabilitation, though some patients may start during inpatient rehabilitation. The participant will be enrolled in the study at the end of the study intervention, at which point cohort descriptors, the Short Self-Efficacy for Exercise (SSEE) scale and the Short Outcome Expectations for Exercise (SOEE) scale, will be collected. Activity monitoring will be conducted for 7 days continuously at three time points: (1) 1 month, (2) 4 months and (3) and 6 months after the end of the study intervention. The Barriers to Being Active Quiz (BBAQ) will be conducted at the 1-month postintervention time point.

References

    1. Tang A, Sibley KM, Thomas SG, et al. . Maximal exercise test results in subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1100–5. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.016
    1. Brooks D, Tang A, Sibley KM, et al. . Profile of patients at admission into an inpatient stroke rehabilitation programme: cardiorespiratory fitness and functional characteristics. Physiother Can 2008;60:171–9. 10.3138/physio.60.2.171
    1. Mackay-Lyons MJ, Makrides L. Exercise capacity early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1697–702. 10.1053/apmr.2002.36395
    1. Rimmer JH, Wang E. Aerobic exercise training in stroke survivors. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005;12:17–30. 10.1310/L6HG-8X8N-QC9Q-HHM8
    1. Tang A, Marzolini S, Oh P, et al. . Feasibility and effects of adapted cardiac rehabilitation after stroke: a prospective trial. BMC Neurol 2010;10:40 10.1186/1471-2377-10-40
    1. Tang A, Sibley KM, Thomas SG, et al. . Effects of an aerobic exercise program on aerobic capacity, spatiotemporal gait parameters, and functional capacity in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:389–97. 10.1177/1545968308326426
    1. Stoller O, de Bruin ED, Knols RH, et al. . Effects of cardiovascular exercise early after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 2012;12:45 10.1186/1471-2377-12-45
    1. Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Brazzelli M, et al. . Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;10:CD003316 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub5
    1. Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, et al. . Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45:2532–53. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022
    1. Biasin L, Sage MD, Brunton K, et al. . Integrating aerobic training within subacute stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. Phys Ther 2014;94:1796–806. 10.2522/ptj.20130404
    1. Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1552–6. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.026
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, et al. . How many steps/day are enough? for older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011;8:80 10.1186/1479-5868-8-80
    1. Baert I, Feys H, Daly D, et al. . Are patients 1 year post-stroke active enough to improve their physical health? Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:574–80. 10.3109/09638288.2011.613513
    1. Morris JH, Williams B. Optimising long-term participation in physical activities after stroke: exploring new ways of working for physiotherapists. Physiotherapy 2009;95:227–33. 10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.006
    1. Rosenberg DE, Bombardier CH, Hoffman JM, et al. . Physical activity among persons aging with mobility disabilities: shaping a research agenda. J Aging Res 2011;2011:1–16. 10.4061/2011/708510
    1. Jones TM, Dean CM, Hush JM, et al. . A systematic review of the efficacy of self-management programs for increasing physical activity in community-dwelling adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). Syst Rev 2015;4:51 10.1186/s13643-015-0039-x
    1. Morris JH, Macgillivray S, McFarlane S. Interventions to promote long-term participation in physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:956–67. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.016
    1. Kim H, Kim O. [The lifestyle modification coaching program for secondary stroke prevention]. J Korean Acad Nurs 2013;43:331–40. 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.3.331
    1. Damush TM, Ofner S, Yu Z, et al. . Implementation of a stroke self-management program: a randomized controlled pilot study of veterans with stroke. Transl Behav Med 2011;1:561–72. 10.1007/s13142-011-0070-y
    1. Gillham S, Endacott R. Impact of enhanced secondary prevention on health behaviour in patients following minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:822–30. 10.1177/0269215510367970
    1. Huijbregts MP, Myers AM, Streiner D, et al. . Implementation, process, and preliminary outcome evaluation of two community programs for persons with stroke and their care partners. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:503–20. 10.1310/tsr1505-503
    1. van der Ploeg HP, Streppel KR, van der Beek AJ, et al. . Successfully improving physical activity behavior after rehabilitation. Am J Health Promot 2007;21:153–9. 10.4278/0890-1171-21.3.153
    1. Zalewski KR, Dvorak L. Barriers to physical activity between adults with stroke and their care partners. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18(Suppl 1):666–75. 10.1310/tsr18s01-666
    1. Mansfield A, Knorr S, Poon V, et al. . Promoting optimal physical exercise for life: an exercise and Self-Management Program to encourage participation in physical activity after Discharge from Stroke Rehabilitation-A Feasibility Study. Stroke Res Treat 2016;2016:9476541 10.1155/2016/9476541
    1. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. . American College of Sports Medicine position stand. quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1334–59. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb
    1. Copas AJ, Lewis JJ, Thompson JA, et al. . Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials 2015;16:352 10.1186/s13063-015-0842-7
    1. Mdege ND, Man MS, Taylor Nee Brown CA, et al. . Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:936–48. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.003
    1. Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, et al. . The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2015;350:h391 10.1136/bmj.h391
    1. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14:377???381–81. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 1982;19:276–88. 10.1037/h0088437
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004;31:143–64. 10.1177/1090198104263660
    1. Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.
    1. Kinne S, Patrick DL, Maher EJ. Correlates of exercise maintenance among people with mobility impairments. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:15–22. 10.1080/096382899298052
    1. Reed M, Harrington R, Duggan A, et al. . Meeting stroke survivors' perceived needs: a qualitative study of a community-based exercise and education scheme. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:16–25. 10.1177/0269215509347433
    1. Resnick B, Michael K, Shaughnessy M, et al. . Inflated perceptions of physical activity after stroke: pairing self-report with physiologic measures. J Phys Act Health 2008;5:308–18. 10.1123/jpah.5.2.308
    1. Klassen TD, Simpson LA, Lim SB, et al. . "Stepping up" activity poststroke: ankle-positioned accelerometer can accurately record Steps During Slow Walking. Phys Ther 2016;96:355–60. 10.2522/ptj.20140611
    1. Washburn RA, Zhu W, McAuley E, et al. . The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: development and evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:193–200. 10.1053/apmr.2002.27467
    1. van der Ploeg HP, Streppel KR, van der Beek AJ, et al. . The physical activity Scale for individuals with physical Disabilities: test-retest reliability and comparison with an accelerometer. J Phys Act Health 2007;4:96–100. 10.1123/jpah.4.1.96
    1. Shaughnessy M, Resnick BM, Macko RF. Reliability and validity testing of the short self-efficacy and outcome expectation for exercise scales in stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;13:214–9. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.07.002
    1. Barriers to being active quiz: centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for chronic disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition and physical activity. Promoting physical activity: a guide for community action. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 1999.
    1. Sawchuk CN, Russo JE, Bogart A, et al. . Barriers and facilitators to walking and physical activity among american indian elders. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8:A63.
    1. Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989;46:660–2. 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026
    1. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, et al. . Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63. 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.58
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    1. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:603–12. 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
    1. Raina P, Wolfson C, Kirkland S. Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) Protocol, 2013.
    1. Schmidt ME, Slanger T, Chang-Claude J, et al. . Evaluation of a short retrospective questionnaire for physical activity in women. Eur J Epidemiol 2006;21:575–85. 10.1007/s10654-006-9042-9
    1. Brown C, Fraser JE, Inness EL, et al. . Does participation in standardized aerobic fitness training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation promote engagement in aerobic exercise after discharge? A cohort study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2014;21(Suppl 1):S42–51. 10.1310/tsr21S1-S42
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials in health research. London: Arnold, 2000.
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3
    1. Davey C, Hargreaves J, Thompson JA, et al. . Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014. Trials 2015;16:358 10.1186/s13063-015-0838-3
    1. Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. . Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke 2016;11:459–84. 10.1177/1747493016643553
    1. MacKay-Lyons M, Macko R, Eng J, et al. . Aerobic exercise recommendations to optimize best bractices in care after stroke, 2012.
    1. Hargreaves JR, Prost A, Fielding KL, et al. . How important is randomisation in a stepped wedge trial? Trials 2015;16:359 10.1186/s13063-015-0872-1
    1. Beard E, Lewis JJ, Copas A, et al. . Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014. Trials 2015;16:353 10.1186/s13063-015-0839-2

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere