A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain

Caroline D Peterson, Mitchell Haas, W Thomas Gregory, Caroline D Peterson, Mitchell Haas, W Thomas Gregory

Abstract

Background: This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of conducting a full scale study and compared the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and a mind-body therapy called Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain, a common morbidity of pregnancy.

Methods: Healthy pregnant women with low back pain of insidious onset were eligible to enroll in the study at any point in their pregnancy. Once enrolled, they remained in the study until they had their babies. Women were randomly allocated into one of three treatment groups using opaque envelopes. The treatment schedule paralleled the prenatal care schedule and women received individualized intervention. Our null hypothesis was that spinal manipulation and Neuro Emotional Technique would perform no better than exercise in enhancing function and decreasing pain. Our primary outcome measure was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and our secondary outcome measure was the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Intention to treat analysis was conducted. For the primary analysis, regression was conducted to compare groups on the outcome measure scores. In a secondary responder analysis, difference in proportions of participants in attaining 30% and 50% improvement were calculated. Feasibility factors for conducting a future larger trial were also evaluated such as recruitment, compliance to study protocols, cost, and adverse events.

Results: Fifty-seven participants were randomized into the exercise (n = 22), spinal manipulation (n = 15), and Neuro Emotional Technique (n = 20) treatment arms. At least 50% of participants in each treatment group experienced clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms for the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. At least 50% of the exercise and spinal manipulation participants also experienced clinically meaningful improvement for the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. There were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences between groups in any analysis.

Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated feasibility for recruitment, compliance, safety, and affordability for conducting a larger study in the future. Spinal manipulation and exercise generally performed slightly better than did Neuro Emotional Technique for improving function and decreasing pain, but the study was not powered to detect the between-group differences as statistically significant.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00937365).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of Participants Through the Trial.

References

    1. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:794–819. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4.
    1. Pennick V, Young G. Interventions for preventing and treating pelvic and back pain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007.
    1. Gutke A, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B. Association between muscle function and low back pain in relation to pregnancy. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(4):304–311. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0170.
    1. Wang S-M, Dezinno P, Maranets I, Berman MR, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Kain ZN. Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:65–70. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129403.54061.0e.
    1. van de Pol G, van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, Heintz APM, van der Vaart CH. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain in The Netherlands. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica. 2007;86:416–422. doi: 10.1080/00016340601151683.
    1. Borg-Stein J, Dugan S, Gruber J. Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3):180–192. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000156970.96219.48.
    1. Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B. Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1343–1347.
    1. Whitcome KK, Shapiro LJ, Lieberman DE. Fetal load and the evolution of lumbar lordosis in bipedal hominins. Nature. 2007;450:1075–1080. doi: 10.1038/nature06342.
    1. Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CHG, Essed GGM, van den Brandt PA. A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;120:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.021.
    1. Mogren I. Perceived health, sick leave, psychosocial situation, and sexual life in women with low-back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:647–656. doi: 10.1080/00016340600607297.
    1. To WWK, Wong MWN. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:1086–1091. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00235.x.
    1. Mogren I. BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1093–1102. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0004-9.
    1. Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E. Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6-year follow-up. Spine. 1997;22(24):2945–2950. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00018.
    1. Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine. 2007;32:1430–1436. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a673.
    1. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(5):776–785.
    1. Assendelft WJJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, Suttorp MJ, Shekelle PG. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:871–881.
    1. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J. 2004;4:335–356. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.06.002.
    1. Bablis P, Pollard H. A randomized controlled trial of neuro-emotional technique for low back pain. Proceedings of the World Federation of Chiropractic 11th Biennial Congress, Rio de Janeiro, April 6–9, 2011. Clinical Chiropractic. 2011;14(4):168–169. doi: 10.1016/j.clch.2011.09.035.
    1. Garshasbi A, Zadeh SF. The effect of exercise on the intensity of low back pain in pregnant women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88:271–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.001.
    1. Morkved S, Salvesen KA, Schei B, Lydersen S, Bo K. Does group training during pregnancy prevent lumbopelvic pain? a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica. 2007;86:276–282. doi: 10.1080/00016340601089651.
    1. Khorsan R, Hawk C, Lisi AJ, Kizhakkeveettil A. Manipulative therapy for pregnancy and related conditions. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(6):416–427. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31819f9ddf.
    1. Lisi AJ. Chiropractic spinal manipulation for low back pain of pregnancy: a retrospective case series. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51(1):e7–e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.09.001.
    1. Stuber KJ, Smith DL. Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(6):447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.009.
    1. Licciardone JC, Buchanan S, Hensel KL, Kind HH, Fulda KG, Stoll ST. Osteopathic manipulative treatment of back pain and related symptoms during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(43):e41–e48.
    1. Eichler H-G, Bloechl-Daum B, Abadie E, Barnett D, Konig F, Pearson S. Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:277–291. doi: 10.1038/nrd3079.
    1. Gynecologists. ACoOa. Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(2):496–499. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200306000-00028.
    1. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, Brown K, Deyo R, Haldeman S. Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical Practice Guideline, Quick Reference Guide Number 14. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, AHCPR Pub. No. 95–0642; 1994.
    1. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Physical Therapy. 1996;76(4):359–365.
    1. Iacoviello BM, McCarthy KS, Barrett MS, Rynn M, Gallop R, Barber JP. Treatment preferences affect the therapeutic alliance: implications for randomized controlled trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2007;75(1):194–198.
    1. McPherson K, Britton AR, Wennberg JE. Are randomized controlled trials controlled? patient preferences and unblind trials. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1997;90:652–656.
    1. Corrigan PW, Salzer MS. The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2003;26(2):109–121. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00014-4.
    1. Depledge J, McNair PJ, Keal-Smith C, Williams M. Management of symphysis pubis dysfunction during pregnancy using exercise and pelvic support belts. Physical Therapy. 2005;85:1290–1300.
    1. Bergmann T, Peterson D. Chiropractic Technique: Principles and Procedures. St. Louis, MI: Elsevier Mosby; 2011.
    1. Hochman JI. The effect of sacro occipital technique category II blocking on spinal range of motion: a case series. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2005;28(9):719–723. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.09.002.
    1. Shearar KA, Colloca CJ, White HL. A randomized clinical trial of manual versus mechanical force manipulation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint syndrome. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2005;28(7):493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.006.
    1. Monti DA, Sufian M, Peterson C. Potential role of mind-body therapies in cancer survivorship. Cancer. 2008;112(11Supplement):2607–2616.
    1. Peterson K, Peterson C. A case series evaluating the accuracy of manual muscle testing for predicting fetal sex. The Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2012;11:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2011.06.010.
    1. Bablis P, Pollard H, Bonello R. Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of trigger point sensitivity in chronic neck pain sufferers: a controlled clinical trial. Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 2008;16:4. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-4.
    1. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004.
    1. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–3124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.
    1. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30(11):1331–1334. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
    1. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2001;28(2):431–438.
    1. Hurley DA, McDonough SM, Martin D, Moore AP, Baxter GD. A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(20):2207–2216. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142234.15437.da.
    1. Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.018.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Pain. 2001;94(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.
    1. Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, Paine J, McQuay HJ. Pregabalin in fibromyalgia - responder analysis from individual patient data. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010;11:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-150.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Rockville, MD: Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information; 2006.
    1. Wood AM, White IR, Thompson SG. Are missing outcome data adequately handled? a review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clinical Trials. 2004;1:368–376. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn032oa.
    1. Hamer RM, Simpson PM. Last observation carried forward versus mixed models in the analysis of psychiatric clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;166(6):639–641. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040458.
    1. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2001;38(6):633–638. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118863.
    1. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grass W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. European Journal of Pain. 2003;8(4):283–291.
    1. Koren G, Sakaguchi S, Klieger C, Kazmin A, Osadchy A, Yazdani-Brojeni P, Matok I. Toward improved pregnancy labelling. Journal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology. 2010;17(3):e349–e357.
    1. Ho SSM, Yu WWM, Lao TT, Chow DHK, Chung JWY, Li Y. Effectiveness of maternity support belts in reducing low back pain during pregnancy: a review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18:1523–1532. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02749.x.
    1. van Duijvenbode I, Jellema P, van Poppel M, van Tulder MW. Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;16(2):CD001823.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Kominski GF, Yu F, Chiang L-M. A randomized trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2006;31(6):611–621. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202559.41193.b2.
    1. UK BEAM Trial Team. United Kingdom back pain, exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomized trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary care. British Medical Journal. 2004;329:1377–1381.
    1. King HH, Tettambel MA, Lockwood MD, Johnson KH, Arsenault DA, Quist R. Osteopathic manipulative treatment in prenatal care: a retrospective case control design study. Journal of American Osteopathic Association. 2003;103(12):577–582.
    1. Hertzman-Miller RP, Morgenstern H, Hurwitz EL, Fei Y, Adams AH, Harber P, Kominski GF. Comparing the satisfaction of low-back pain patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care: Results from the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study. American Journal of Public Health. 2002;92:1628–1633. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1628.
    1. Grieves B, Menke JM, Pursel KJ. Cost minimization analysis of low back pain claims data for chiropractic vs medicine in a managed care organization. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2009;32(9):734–739. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.10.001.
    1. Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, McGovern EE. Outcome of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain treated according to a diagnosis-based decision rule: a prospective observational cohort study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2009;32(8):616–624. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.09.002.
    1. Noren L, Ostgaard S, Johansson G, Ostgaard HC. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up. European Spine Journal. 2002;11:267–271. doi: 10.1007/s00586-001-0357-7.
    1. Nilsson-Wikmar L, Holm K, Oijerstedt R, Harms-Ringdahl K. Effect of three different physical therapy treatments on pain and activity in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up postpartum. Spine. 2005;30(8):850–856. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158870.68159.d9.
    1. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J. et al.Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine. 2010;35(18):1714–1720. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd656f.
    1. Williams D. Pregnancy: a stress test for life. Current Opinions in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;15:465–471. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200312000-00002.
    1. Chodick G, Elchalal U, Sella T, Heymann AD, Porath A, Kokia E, Shalev V. The risk of overt diabetes mellitus among women with gestational diabetes: a population-based study. Diabetic Medicine. 2010;27(7):779–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02995.x.
    1. Drost JT, Maas AHEM, van Eyck J, van der Schouw YT. Preeclampsia as a female-specific risk factor for chronic hypertension. Maturitas. 2010;67:321–326. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.08.002.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere