Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study

W Y Park, J S Thompson, K K Lee, W Y Park, J S Thompson, K K Lee

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia decrease the incidence of death and major complications during and after four types of intraabdominal surgical procedures.

Summary background data: Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients have shown conflicting results.

Methods: The authors studied 1,021 patients who required anesthesia for one of the intraabdominal aortic, gastric, biliary, or colon operations. They were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2). The patients were monitored for death and major complications during and for 30 days after surgery, as well as for postoperative pain, time of ambulation, and length of hospital stay.

Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death and major complications between the two groups. For abdominal aortic surgical patients, unlike the other three types of surgical patients, the overall incidence of death and major complications was significantly lower in group 2 patients (22%) than in group 1 patients (37%), stemming from differences in the incidence of new myocardial infarction, stroke, and respiratory failure between the two groups. Overall, group 2 patients received significantly less analgesic medication but had better pain relief than group 1 patients. In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter.

Conclusions: The effect of anesthetic and postoperative analgesic techniques on perioperative outcome varies with the type of operation performed. Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain relief. Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and shorten the intubation time and intensive care stay in patients undergoing abdominal aortic operations.

References

    1. Enquist A, Brandt MR, Fernandes A, et al. The blocking effect of epidural analgesia on the adrenocortical and hyperglycemic response to surgery. Acta Anesth Scand 1977; 21: 330–335.
    1. Brandt MR, Fernandes A, Mordhost R, et al. Epidural analgesia improves postoperative nitrogen balance. Br Med J 1978; 1: 1106–1108.
    1. Yeager MP, Glass DD, Neff RK, et al. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia in high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1987; 66: 729–736.
    1. Park WY, Poon KC, Macnamara TE. Epidural block for lumbar laminectomy. Reg Anesth 1987; 12: 48–49.
    1. Modig J, Karlstrom G. Intra- and post-operative blood loss and hemodynamics in total hip replacement when performed under lumbar epidural versus general anesthesia. Eur J Anesthesiol 1987; 4: 345–355.
    1. Weber S, Bennett CR, Jones NF. Improvement in blood flow during lower extremity microsurgical free tissue transfer associated with epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 703–705.
    1. Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. Anesthesiology 1984; 61: 276–310.
    1. Christopherson R, Beattie C, Frank SM, et al. Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 422–434.
    1. Baron JF, Bertland M, Barre E, et al. Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 1991; 75: 611–618.
    1. Hjortso NC, Neumann P, Frosig F, et al. A controlled study on the effect of epidural analgesia with local anesthetics and morphine on morbidity after abdominal surgery. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1985; 29: 790–796.
    1. Rivers SP, Scher LA, Sheehan E, et al. Epidural versus general anesthesia for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 764–770.
    1. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, March RJ, et al. Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 696–704.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 1975; 31: 103–115.
    1. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 845–850.
    1. Stanford Center for Health Care Research. Study of institutional differences in postoperative mortality (IDS). National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of Commerce. PB-250 940, Dec. 15, 1974.
    1. Gail M, Simon R. Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 1985; 41: 361–372.
    1. Bode RH Jr, Lewis KP, Zarich SW, et al. Cardiac outcome after peripheral vascular surgery. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 3–13.
    1. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. Br Med J 2000; 321: 1493–1497.
    1. Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia: their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1474–1506.
    1. Mason RA, Newton GB, Cassel W, et al. Combined epidural and general anesthesia in aortic surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1990; 31: 442–447.
    1. Kavanaugh BP, Katz J, Sandler AN. Pain control after thoracic surgery: a review of current techniques. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 737–759.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere