Randomised controlled trial of zinc supplementation in malnourished Bangladeshi children with acute diarrhoea
S K Roy, A M Tomkins, S M Akramuzzaman, R H Behrens, R Haider, D Mahalanabis, G Fuchs, S K Roy, A M Tomkins, S M Akramuzzaman, R H Behrens, R Haider, D Mahalanabis, G Fuchs
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of zinc supplementation on the clinical course, stool weight, duration of diarrhoea, changes in serum zinc, and body weight gain of children with acute diarrhoea.
Design: Randomised double blind controlled trial. Children were assigned to receive zinc (20 mg elemental zinc per day) containing multivitamins or control group (zinc-free multivitamins) daily in three divided doses for two weeks.
Setting: A diarrhoeal disease hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Patients: 111 children, 3 to 24 months old, below 76% median weight for age of the National Center for Health Statistics standard with acute diarrhoea. Children with severe infection and/or oedema were excluded.
Main outcome measures: Total diarrhoeal stool output, duration of diarrhoea, rate of weight gain, and changes in serum zinc levels after supplementation.
Results: Stool output was 28% less and duration 14% shorter in the zinc supplemented group than placebo (p = 0.06). There were reductions in median total diarrhoeal stool output among zinc supplemented subjects who were shorter (less than 95% height for age), 239 v 326 g/kg (p < 0.04), and who had a lower initial serum zinc (< 14 mmol/l), 279 v 329 g/kg (p < 0.05); a shortening of mean time to recovery occurred (4.7 v 6.2 days, p < 0.04) in those with lower serum zinc. There was an increase in mean serum zinc in the zinc supplemented group (+2.4 v -0.3 mumol/l, p < 0.001) during two weeks of supplementation, and better mean weight gain (120 v 30 g, p < 0.03) at the time of discharge from hospital.
Conclusions: Zinc supplementation is a simple, acceptable, and affordable strategy which should be considered in the management of acute diarrhoea and in prevention of growth faltering in children specially those who are malnourished.
References
- Br Med J. 1972 Sep 2;3(5826):566-9
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jan;65(1):13-9
- Lancet. 1974 Aug 17;2(7877):399-400
- N Engl J Med. 1975 Apr 24;292(17):879-82
- Lancet. 1976 May 15;1(7968):1085
- J Nutr. 1977 May;107(5):855-61
- Br J Nutr. 1977 May;37(3):441-50
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Apr;32(4):856-71
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Dec;32(12):2390-9
- Lancet. 1981 Apr 18;1(8225):860-2
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 May;34(5):900-8
- Bull World Health Organ. 1982;60(4):605-13
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Jan;39(1):87-94
- J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Sep;3(4):608-12
- Proc Nutr Soc. 1986 Feb;45(1):39-44
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Mar;45(3):602-8
- J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Dec;20(6):893-901
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Jun;47(6):1036-40
- J Pediatr. 1988 Sep;113(3):452-7
- Eur J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;42(8):709-14
- J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):877-81
- Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jul;52(1):166-72
- J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992 Oct;15(3):289-96
- N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 28;333(13):839-44
- Pediatr Res. 1972 Dec;6(12):868-74
Source: PubMed