Randomised controlled trial of zinc supplementation in malnourished Bangladeshi children with acute diarrhoea

S K Roy, A M Tomkins, S M Akramuzzaman, R H Behrens, R Haider, D Mahalanabis, G Fuchs, S K Roy, A M Tomkins, S M Akramuzzaman, R H Behrens, R Haider, D Mahalanabis, G Fuchs

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of zinc supplementation on the clinical course, stool weight, duration of diarrhoea, changes in serum zinc, and body weight gain of children with acute diarrhoea.

Design: Randomised double blind controlled trial. Children were assigned to receive zinc (20 mg elemental zinc per day) containing multivitamins or control group (zinc-free multivitamins) daily in three divided doses for two weeks.

Setting: A diarrhoeal disease hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Patients: 111 children, 3 to 24 months old, below 76% median weight for age of the National Center for Health Statistics standard with acute diarrhoea. Children with severe infection and/or oedema were excluded.

Main outcome measures: Total diarrhoeal stool output, duration of diarrhoea, rate of weight gain, and changes in serum zinc levels after supplementation.

Results: Stool output was 28% less and duration 14% shorter in the zinc supplemented group than placebo (p = 0.06). There were reductions in median total diarrhoeal stool output among zinc supplemented subjects who were shorter (less than 95% height for age), 239 v 326 g/kg (p < 0.04), and who had a lower initial serum zinc (< 14 mmol/l), 279 v 329 g/kg (p < 0.05); a shortening of mean time to recovery occurred (4.7 v 6.2 days, p < 0.04) in those with lower serum zinc. There was an increase in mean serum zinc in the zinc supplemented group (+2.4 v -0.3 mumol/l, p < 0.001) during two weeks of supplementation, and better mean weight gain (120 v 30 g, p < 0.03) at the time of discharge from hospital.

Conclusions: Zinc supplementation is a simple, acceptable, and affordable strategy which should be considered in the management of acute diarrhoea and in prevention of growth faltering in children specially those who are malnourished.

References

    1. Br Med J. 1972 Sep 2;3(5826):566-9
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jan;65(1):13-9
    1. Lancet. 1974 Aug 17;2(7877):399-400
    1. N Engl J Med. 1975 Apr 24;292(17):879-82
    1. Lancet. 1976 May 15;1(7968):1085
    1. J Nutr. 1977 May;107(5):855-61
    1. Br J Nutr. 1977 May;37(3):441-50
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Apr;32(4):856-71
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979 Dec;32(12):2390-9
    1. Lancet. 1981 Apr 18;1(8225):860-2
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 May;34(5):900-8
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1982;60(4):605-13
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Jan;39(1):87-94
    1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1984 Sep;3(4):608-12
    1. Proc Nutr Soc. 1986 Feb;45(1):39-44
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Mar;45(3):602-8
    1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Dec;20(6):893-901
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Jun;47(6):1036-40
    1. J Pediatr. 1988 Sep;113(3):452-7
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1988 Aug;42(8):709-14
    1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1988 Nov-Dec;7(6):877-81
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jul;52(1):166-72
    1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992 Oct;15(3):289-96
    1. N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 28;333(13):839-44
    1. Pediatr Res. 1972 Dec;6(12):868-74

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere