The compound role of a coordinator for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: qualitative study

Stein Erik Fæø, Oscar Tranvåg, Rune Samdal, Bettina S Husebo, Frøydis K Bruvik, Stein Erik Fæø, Oscar Tranvåg, Rune Samdal, Bettina S Husebo, Frøydis K Bruvik

Abstract

Background: As the number of persons with dementia is increasing, there has been a call for establishing sustainable clinical pathways for coordinating care and support for this group. The LIVE@Home.Path trial is a multicomponent, multi-disciplinary intervention combining learning, innovation, volunteer support and empowerment. To implement the intervention, a municipal coordinator has a crucial role. Implementation research on multicomponent interventions is complex and we conducted a qualitative study, aiming to explore the coordinator role and how a coordinator may empower persons with dementia in decision-making processes.

Methods: Qualitative program evaluation combined with a hermeneutic interpretive approach was chosen as methodological approach. Sixteen dyads, consisting of the person with dementia and their main informal caregiver received the intervention by two coordinators. Of these, six dyads, three informal caregivers alone and the two care coordinators along with their leader, in sum, eighteen persons, participated in in-depth or focus group interviews, sharing their experiences after 6 months intervention.

Results: We found that the coordinators fulfilled three functions for the participating dyads: being a safety net, meaning that the dyads might have little needs at the moment, but found safety in a relation to someone who might help if the situation should change; being a pathfinder, meaning that they supported the dyads in finding their way through the complicated system of care and support services; being a source for emotional care and support, meaning that they listened, acknowledged and gave counsel in times of distress. The coordinators emphasized that a trusting leader and work environment was crucial for them to fulfill these functions. We also found that it was challenging for the coordinators to build a relation to the persons with dementia in order to pursue genuine empowerment in decision-making processes.

Conclusion: We found the framework for follow-up to be a feasible starting point for establishing empowering coordination and a sustainable care pathway for persons with dementia and their informal caregivers. More meeting points between coordinator and person with dementia should be pursued in order to fulfill the persons' fundamental rights to participate in decision-making processes.

Keywords: Care coordination; Case management; Decision-making; Dementia; Empowerment; Home-dwelling; LIVE@Home.Path; Qualitative study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Dementia - a public health priority. United Kingdom: World Health Organisation; 2012.
    1. World Health Organisation . Towards a dementia plan: a WHO guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers. London: NICE; 2018.
    1. Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, Ballard C, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Cedazo-Minguez A, Dubois B, Edvardsson D, Feldman H, et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(5):455–532. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4.
    1. Black BS, Johnston D, Rabins PV, Morrison A, Lyketsos C, Samus QM. Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing Independence at home study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2087–2095. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12549.
    1. Dawson A, Bowes A, Kelly F, Velzke K, Ward R. Evidence of what works to support and sustain care at home for people with dementia: a literature review with a systematic approach. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:59. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0053-9.
    1. Etters L, Goodall D, Harrison BE. Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Nurse Prac. 2008;20(8):423–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00342.x.
    1. Reilly S, Miranda-Castillo C, Malouf R, Hoe J, Toot S, Challis D, Orrell M. Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD008345.
    1. Backhouse A, Ukoumunne OC, Richards DA, McCabe R, Watkins R, Dickens C. The effectiveness of community-based coordinating interventions in dementia care: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of intervention components. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2677-2.
    1. Iliffe S, Wilcock J, Synek M, Carboch R, Hradcová D, Holmerová I. Case Management for People with dementia and its translations: a discussion paper. Dementia. 2017;18(3):951–969. doi: 10.1177/1471301217697802.
    1. Smebye KL, Kirkevold M, Engedal K. Ethical dilemmas concerning autonomy when persons with dementia wish to live at home: a qualitative, hermeneutic study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1217-1.
    1. Smebye KL, Kirkevold M, Engedal K. How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:241. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241.
    1. Haugen I, Ytrehus S, Slettebø T. User participation among people with dementia living at home. Nord Soc Work Res. 2018;9(2):147–159. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2018.1494035.
    1. Fæø SE, Bruvik FK, Tranvag, O, Husebo B. Home-dwelling persons with dementia's perception on care support; qualitative study. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(4):991–1002.
    1. Tranvag O, Petersen KA, Naden D. Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: perceptions of persons living with dementia. Nurs Ethics. 2015;22(5):577–593. doi: 10.1177/0969733014549882.
    1. O'Rourke HM, Duggleby W, Fraser KD, Jerke L. Factors that affect quality of life from the perspective of people with dementia: a metasynthesis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(1):24–38. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13178.
    1. Bjorklof GH, Helvik AS, Ibsen TL, Telenius EW, Grov EK, Eriksen S. Balancing the struggle to live with dementia: a systematic meta-synthesis of coping. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1306-9.
    1. Tranvag O, Petersen KA, Naden D. Dignity-preserving dementia care: a metasynthesis. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(8):861–880. doi: 10.1177/0969733013485110.
    1. Cahill S. Dementia and human rights. Bristol: Policy Press; 2018.
    1. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilites, General Comment No 1, Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law, Office for the High Commisioner for Human Rights. 2014. . Accessed 20 Dec 2019.
    1. World Health Organsisation. Enduring a human rights-based approach for people living with dementia. United Kingdom: World Health Organisation; 2015.
    1. Husebo BS, Allore H, Achterberg W, Angeles RC, Ballard C, Bruvik FK, Faeo SE, Gedde MH, Hillestad E, Jacobsen FF, et al. LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y.
    1. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods : integrating theory and practice, fourth edition edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2015.
    1. Gadamer H-G. Truth and method. London: Bloomsbury; 2013.
    1. Fleming V, Gaidys U, Robb Y. Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nurs Inq. 2003;10(2):113–120. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00163.x.
    1. Morrow E, Boaz A, Brearley S, Ross F. Handbook of service user involvement in nursing and healthcare research. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
    1. Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997.
    1. Hellstrom I, Nolan M, Nordenfelt L, Lundh U. Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14(5):608–619. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
    1. Martinsen K. Care and vulnerability. Oslo: Akribe As; 2006.
    1. Montano D, Reeske A, Franke F, Hüffmeier J. Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: a comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(3):327–350. doi: 10.1002/job.2124.
    1. McCance T, McCormack B. The person-centred practice framework. In: McCormack B, McCance T, editors. Person-Centred Practice in Nursing and Health Care: Theory and Practice. 2. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley; 2017.
    1. Backhouse A, Richards DA, McCabe R, Watkins R, Dickens C. Stakeholders perspectives on the key components of community-based interventions coordinating care in dementia: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2725-y.
    1. Fæø SE, Husebo BS, Bruvik FK, Tranvåg O. “We live as good a life as we can, in the situation we’re in” – the significance of the home as perceived by persons with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1171-6.
    1. Taghizadeh Larsson A, Osterholm JH. How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(11):1849–1862. doi: 10.1017/S104161021400132X.
    1. Flo E, Husebo BS, Bruusgaard P, Gjerberg E, Thoresen L, Lillemoen L, Pedersen R. A review of the implementation and research strategies of advance care planning in nursing homes. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0179-4.
    1. Kelly AJ, Luckett T, Clayton JM, Gabb L, Kochovska S, Agar, M. Advance care planning in different settings for people with dementia: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Palliat Support Care. 2019;17(6):707–19.
    1. Bosco A, Schneider J, Coleston-Shields DM, Jawahar K, Higgs P, Orrell M. Agency in dementia care: systematic review and meta-ethnography. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;31(5):627–642. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001801.
    1. Bremer P, Cabrera E, Leino-Kilpi H, Lethin C, Saks K, Sutcliffe C, Soto M, Zwakhalen SM, Wubker A. Informal dementia care: consequences for caregivers’ health and health care use in 8 European countries. Health Policy. 2015;119(11):1459–1471. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.014.
    1. Osuji PI. Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;21(1):101–111. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7.
    1. Gomez-Virseda C, de Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3.
    1. Dening K. Advance care planning in dementia. Nurs Stand. 2015;29(51):41–46. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.51.41.e10060.
    1. Lord K, Livingston G, Robertson S, Cooper C. How people with dementia and their families decide about moving to a care home and support their needs: development of a decision aid, a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:68. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0242-1.
    1. Staats K, Grov EK, Husebo B, Tranvag O. Framework for patient and informal caregiver participation in research (PAICPAIR): part 1. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020;43(2):E58–E70. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000289.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere