The acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of a music application developed using participatory design for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their caregivers. The "Alight" app in the LIVE@Home.Path trial

Line Iden Berge, Marie Hidle Gedde, Juan Carlos Torrado Vidal, Bettina Husebo, Kia Minna Hynninen, Solgunn Elisabeth Knardal, Kristine Gustavsen Madsø, Line Iden Berge, Marie Hidle Gedde, Juan Carlos Torrado Vidal, Bettina Husebo, Kia Minna Hynninen, Solgunn Elisabeth Knardal, Kristine Gustavsen Madsø

Abstract

Background: Music interventions for persons with dementia can improve health and interaction with caregivers, yet the reach is often restricted to institutions. We describe the participatory design process of a prototype music application for patients affiliated with a gerontopsychiatric hospital and evaluate the acceptability, adoption, and feasibility of use for dyads of home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers.

Methods: The application "Alight" was developed following an iterative, expert-driven participatory design approach, which includes a requirement elicitation phase and two rounds of prototyping and testing in real-world settings. End users and stakeholders were involved in all steps, that is, workshops, interviews, field observation, ethnographic inquiries, and beta testing sessions with music therapists, patients, and caregivers in collaboration with a commercial music and technology company. The last prototyping and testing took place in the LIVE@Home.Path trial, a stepped-wedge multicomponent randomized controlled trial to improve resource utilization and caregiver burden in municipal dementia care during 2019-2021.

Results: Mean age of the person with dementia in the LIVE@Home.Path trial was 82 years, 62% were female, and the majority had Alzheimer's dementia (44%) of mild severity (71%). Sixty-three dyads were offered Alight in the multicomponent intervention, of which 13% (n = 8) accepted use. The dyads accepting Alight did not differ in demographic and clinical characteristics compared to those not interested. The feasibility was high among those accepting Alight, 75% (n = 6) reported a positive impact on mood, 50% (n = 4) experienced a positive impact on activity, and 50% (n = 4) gooduser-friendliness. The adoption was high with daily use or use several times a week reported by 63% (n = 5). Obstacles emerged when updating the application in homes without wireless Wi-Fi, and some participants were unfamiliar with using touchscreens.

Conclusion: The feasibility and adoption of the application were high and accepting dyads did not differ on demographic and clinical variables from those not reached. This suggests a high potential for utilization in dementia care. This study contributes methodologically to the field of participatory design and mHealth interventions by demonstrating a specific design approach that throughout the process successfully involved researchers, industry partners, health care practitioners, and end users.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04043364.

Keywords: acceptability; adoption; application; dementia; home-dwelling; music interventions; participatory design.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Berge, Gedde, Torrado Vidal, Husebo, Hynninen, Knardal and Madsø.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The iterative participatory design process of the Alight application.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of a launch page in the Alight application. The user presses the ≪play≫ icon to start the video.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Acceptability of the Alight application in the stepped wedge randomized controlled LIVE@Home.Path trial. A total of 124 dyads of persons with dementia and their caregiver were included in Bergen municipality before 01/09/2019 and randomized in time to receive the 6-month LIVE intervention in three groups. Group 1 received the intervention from 01/09/2019 to 28/02/2020, Group 2 received a modified version of the intervention without Alight from 01/03/2020 to 31/08/2020 (COVID-19 restrictions), and Group 3 received the intervention from 01/09/2020 to 28/02/2021. Demographic and clinical data from the dyads utilized in this study were collected before start of intervention groups 1 and 3 (months 0 and 12).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Data on adoption and feasibility of the Alight application tested in 8 dyads of PwD and caregivers in the LIVE@Home.Path trial.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Fact Sheet Dementia. (2021). Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. World Health Organization . The Top 10 Causes of Death. (2020). Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. Husebo BS, Allore H, Achterberg W, Angeles RC, Ballard C, Bruvik FK, et al. . LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method. Stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial. Trials. (2020) 21:510. 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y
    1. Sihvonen AJ, Sarkamo T, Leo V, Tervaniemi M, Altenmuller E, Soinila S. Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:648–60. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-0
    1. Särkämö T, Tervaniemi M, Laitinen S, Numminen A, Kurki M, Johnson JK, et al. . Cognitive, emotional, and social benefits of regular musical activities in early dementia: randomized controlled study. Gerontologist. (2014) 54:634–50. 10.1093/geront/gnt100
    1. van der Steen JT, Smaling HJ, van der Wouden JC, Bruinsma MS, Scholten RJ, Vink AC. Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2018) 7:CD003477. 10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub3
    1. Hsu MH, Flowerdew R, Parker M, Fachner J, Odell-Miller H. Individual music therapy for managing neuropsychiatric symptoms for people with dementia and their carers: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study. BMC Geriatr. (2015) 15:1–19. 10.1186/s12877-015-0082-4
    1. World Health Organization . eHealth. Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. Bradway M, Carrion C, Vallespin B, Saadatfard O, Puigdomènech E, Espallargues M, et al. . mHealth assessment: conceptualization of a global framework. JMIR mHealth uHealth. (2017) 5:e7291. 10.2196/mhealth.7291
    1. Yousaf K, Mehmood Z, Awan IA, Saba T, Alharbey R, Qadah T, et al. . A comprehensive study of mobile-health based assistive technology for the healthcare of dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Health Care Manag Sci. (2020) 23:287–309. 10.1007/s10729-019-09486-0
    1. Yousaf K, Mehmood Z, Saba T, Rehman A, Munshi AM, Alharbey R, et al. . Mobile-health applications for the efficient delivery of health care facility to people with dementia (PwD) and support to their carers: A survey. Biomed Res Int. (2019) 2019:7151475. 10.1155/2019/7151475
    1. Kim E, Baskys A, Law AV, Roosan MR, Li Y, Roosan D. Scoping review: the empowerment of Alzheimer's Disease caregivers with mHealth applications. NPJ Dig Med. (2021) 4:1–8. 10.1038/s41746-021-00506-4
    1. Bateman DR, Srinivas B, Emmett TW, Schleyer TK, Holden RJ, Hendrie HC, et al. . Categorizing health outcomes and efficacy of mHealth apps for persons with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. (2017) 19:e7814. 10.2196/jmir.7814
    1. Cunningham S, Brill M, Whalley JH, Read R, Anderson G, Edwards S, et al. . Assessing wellbeing in people living with dementia using reminiscence music with a mobile app (memory tracks): A mixed methods cohort study. J Healthc Eng. (2019) 2019:8924273. 10.1155/2019/8924273
    1. Brown A, O'Connor S. Mobile health applications for people with dementia: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. Inform Health Soc Care. (2020) 45:343–59. 10.1080/17538157.2020.1728536
    1. Boyd H, McKernon S, Mullin B, Old A. Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. NZ Med J. (2012) 125:76–87.
    1. Foth M, Axup J. Participatory design and action research: Identical twins or synergetic pair?. In: Jacucci G, Kensing F, Wagner I, Blomberg J, editors. Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design 2. Trento: (2006). p. 93–6.
    1. Eyles H, Jull A, Dobson R, Firestone R, Whittaker R, Te Morenga L, et al. . Co-design of mHealth delivered interventions: a systematic review to assess key methods and processes. Curr Nutr Rep. (2016) 5:160–7. 10.1007/s13668-016-0165-7
    1. Leorin C, Stella E, Nugent C, Cleland I, Paggetti C. The value of including people with dementia in the co-design of personalized eHealth technologies. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2019) 47:164–75. 10.1159/000497804
    1. Demirbilek O, Demirkan H. Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model. Appl Ergon. (2004) 35:361–70. 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.003
    1. Soundio . Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. VIS Innovation. Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. Brancatisano O, Baird A, Thompson WF. Why is music therapeutic for neurological disorders? The therapeutic music capacities model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2020) 112:600–15. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.008
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. (1975) 12:189–98. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
    1. Reisberg B. Functional assessment staging (FAST). Psychopharmacol Bull. (1988) 24:653–9. 10.1037/t08620-000
    1. Lawton MP. Aging and performance of home tasks. Hum Fact. (1990) 32:527–36. 10.1177/001872089003200503
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. (1969) 9:179–86. 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
    1. Cummings J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: development and applications. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. (2020) 33:73–84. 10.1177/0891988719882102
    1. Hoe J, Katona C, Roch B, Livingston G. Use of the QOL-AD for measuring quality of life in people with severe dementia–the LASER-AD study. Age Ageing. (2005) 34:130–5. 10.1093/ageing/afi030
    1. Whynes DK, Group T. Correspondence between EQ-5D health state classifications and EQ VAS scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2008) 6:94. 10.1186/1477-7525-6-94
    1. Ulstein I, Bruun Wyller T, Engedal K. The relative stress scale, a useful instrument to identify various aspects of carer burden in dementia? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2007) 22:61–7. 10.1002/gps.1654
    1. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. . Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. (1982) 17:37–49. 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
    1. Borsci S, Federici S, Lauriola M. On the dimensionality of the system usability scale: a test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process. (2009) 10:193–7. 10.1007/s10339-009-0268-9
    1. Gedde MH, Husebo BS, Erdal A, Puaschitz NG, Vislapuu M, Angeles RC, et al. . Access to and interest in assistive technology for home-dwelling people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic (PAN.DEM). Int Rev Psychiatry. (2021) 33:404–11. 10.1080/09540261.2020.1845620
    1. De Marchi F, Contaldi E, Magistrelli L, Cantello R, Comi C, Mazzini L. Telehealth in neurodegenerative diseases: opportunities and challenges for patients and physicians. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:237. 10.3390/brainsci11020237
    1. Careinnovations . What is mHealth? How Is It Different From Telehealth? Retrieved from: (accessed May 20, 2022).
    1. Vahia IV, Dickinson RA, Trueba AF. Are mobile apps in geriatric mental health worth the effort?. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2022) 30:585–7. 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.12.018
    1. Kiosses DN, Monkovic J, Stern A, Czaja SJ, Alexopoulos G, Arslanoglou E, et al. . An emotion regulation tablet app for middle-aged and older adults at high suicide risk: Feasibility, acceptability, and two case studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2022) 30:575–84. 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.08.015
    1. Puaschitz NG, Jacobsen FF, Mannseth J, Angeles RC, Berge LI, Gedde MH, et al. . Factors associated with access to assistive technology and telecare in home-dwelling people with dementia: baseline data from the LIVE@ Home. Path trial BMC Med Inform Decis Making. (2021) 21:1–14. 10.1186/s12911-021-01627-2
    1. Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Vilsen CR, Ruth K, Gustafsson M, Ringkøbing SP, et al. . Self-management and cognitive rehabilitation in early stage dementia–merging methods to promote coping and adoption of assistive technology. A pilot study. Aging Mental Health. (2020) 24:1894–903. 10.1080/13607863.2019.1625302
    1. Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Waldemar G. Designing the ReACT app to support self-management of people with dementia: an iterative user-involving process. Gerontology. (2019) 65:673–85. 10.1159/000500445
    1. Øksnebjerg L, Woods B, Ruth K, Lauridsen A, Kristiansen S, Holst HD, et al. . A tablet app supporting self-management for people with dementia: explorative study of adoption and use patterns. JMIR mHealth uHealth. (2020) 8:e14694. 10.2196/14694
    1. Dawson A, Bowes A, Kelly F, Velzke K, Ward R. Evidence of what works to support and sustain care at home for people with dementia: a literature review with a systematic approach. BMC Geriatr. (2015) 15:59. 10.1186/s12877-015-0053-9
    1. Rasche P, Wille M, Bröhl C, Theis S, Schäfer K, Knobe M, et al. . Prevalence of health app use among older adults in Germany: national survey. JMIR mHealth uHealth. (2018) 6:e8619. 10.2196/mhealth.8619

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere