Comparative toxicity of amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride in healthy adults

F G Hayden, J M Gwaltney Jr, R L Van de Castle, K F Adams, B Giordani, F G Hayden, J M Gwaltney Jr, R L Van de Castle, K F Adams, B Giordani

Abstract

The relative toxicities of amantadine and rimantadine were compared in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving healthy adults. In separate studies, drugs were administered at a dosage of 200 mg/day (52 volunteers) or 300 mg/day (196 volunteers) for 4.5 days. Both drugs were well tolerated at the lower dosage. At 300 mg/day amantadine recipients had a greater frequency and severity of central nervous system (nervousness, lightheadedness, difficulty concentrating) and sleep (insomnia, fatigue) complaints compared with rimantadine or placebo recipients. Amantadine recipients also performed less well on an objective test measuring sustained attention and problem-solving ability. Both amantadine and rimantadine recipients reported adverse gastrointestinal symptoms more often than placebo recipients. Because of better tolerance at higher dosage, rimantadine offers more promise than amantadine for treatment of influenza A virus infections.

References

    1. JAMA. 1972 Nov 13;222(7):792-5
    1. Neurology. 1975 Feb;25(2):184-8
    1. JAMA. 1976 Jun 21;235(25):2739-42
    1. JAMA. 1979 Mar 9;241(10):1003-7
    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Nov-Dec;17(11-12):704-8
    1. Am J Med Sci. 1969 May;257(5):328-35
    1. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1974 Jan;158(1):37-49
    1. JAMA. 1968 Mar 25;203(13):1095-9
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Dec;26(6):729-36
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 May;17(5):865-70
    1. J Med Chem. 1971 Jun;14(6):535-43
    1. N Engl J Med. 1974 Dec 5;291(23):1257
    1. Infect Immun. 1970 Feb;1(2):200-4
    1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1968 Oct;10(5):626-32
    1. Science. 1970 Jul 10;169(3941):203-4
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Aug;85(2):177-82
    1. N Engl J Med. 1969 Sep 11;281(11):579-84
    1. Lancet. 1970 May 30;1(7657):1130-3
    1. J Infect Dis. 1980 May;141(5):543-7

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere