Design of a 3D-printed, open-source wrist-driven orthosis for individuals with spinal cord injury

Alexandra A Portnova, Gaurav Mukherjee, Keshia M Peters, Ann Yamane, Katherine M Steele, Alexandra A Portnova, Gaurav Mukherjee, Keshia M Peters, Ann Yamane, Katherine M Steele

Abstract

Assistive technology, such as wrist-driven orthoses (WDOs), can be used by individuals with spinal cord injury to improve hand function. A lack of innovation and challenges in obtaining WDOs have limited their use. These orthoses can be heavy and uncomfortable for users and also time-consuming for orthotists to fabricate. The goal of this research was to design a WDO with user (N = 3) and orthotist (N = 6) feedback to improve the accessibility, customizability, and function of WDOs by harnessing advancements in 3D-printing. The 3D-printed WDO reduced hands-on assembly time to approximately 1.5 hours and the material costs to $15 compared to current fabrication methods. Varying improvements in users' hand function were observed during functional tests, such as the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test. For example, one participant's ability on the small object task improved by 29 seconds with the WDO, while another participant took 25 seconds longer to complete this task with the WDO. Two users had a significant increase in grasp strength with the WDO (13-122% increase), while the other participant was able to perform a pinching grasp for the first time. The WDO designs are available open-source to increase accessibility and encourage future innovation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Metal and 3D-printed WDOs.
Fig 1. Metal and 3D-printed WDOs.
(A) Traditional WDO fabricated from the Jaeco kit. (B) 3D-printed WDO from this research.
Fig 2. The experimental setup of the…
Fig 2. The experimental setup of the study with 3D-printed WDOs.
(A) P&O student fabricating a 3D-printed WDO using the device manual. (B) User performs the writing task of the JTHF test with a 3D-printed WDO.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Exploded (A) and assembled (B) view of the CAD model of the 11 pieces of the 3D-printed WDO.
Fig 4. Selected design improvements in the…
Fig 4. Selected design improvements in the 3D-printed WDO.
(A) Additional linkage between the thumb and the finger piece. (B) Curved thumb piece. (C) Elongated palmar piece.
Fig 5. Device scores from testing with…
Fig 5. Device scores from testing with P&O students and users.
Scores from P&O students (gray boxes) rating the 3D-printed WDO on fabrication speed, function, aesthetics, and comfort (1 = poor/slow, 10 = great/fast). Scores from the three individuals with SCI (colored points) rating the function, aesthetics, comfort, ease of donning, and suitability of the 3D-printed device to their daily needs. Only results from the last visit are shown for each of the users, to account for the iterative modifications to the WDO design.
Fig 6. Users’ performance with and without…
Fig 6. Users’ performance with and without 3D-printed WDO.
(A) Performance during JTHF Test. (B) Performance during Box-and-Blocks Test. Users’ average pinch force during a (C) key grip without the WDO and (D) during a three-jaw chuck grasp with and without the WDO.
Fig 7. Comparison between visits 2 and…
Fig 7. Comparison between visits 2 and 3 for P2 and P3.
(A) JTHF Test. (B) Box-and-Blocks Test.

References

    1. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Factors and figures at a glance. 2013. Available from: .
    1. Duchowny M. Hemispherectomy for epilepsy When is one half better than two?. Neurology. 2004. May 25;62(10):1664–5.
    1. Hsu JD, Michael J, Fisk J. AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. June 27.
    1. Edelstein JE, Bruckner J. Orthotics: a comprehensive clinical approach Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2002. January.
    1. Yeoun-Seung Kang MD, Lee BS. Biomechanical evaluation of wrist-driven flexor hinge orthosis in persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2013. September 10;50(8):1129 doi:
    1. Rayner J, Hammond A. Effects of commercial wrist extensor orthoses (CWEOs) on hand function and grip strength in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). InARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM 1996. September 1 (Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 1154–1154). 227 EAST WASHINGTON SQ, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106: LIPPINCOTT-RAVEN PUBL.
    1. Collier SE, Thomas JJ. Range of motion at the wrist: a comparison study of four wrist extension orthoses and the free hand. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2002. March 1;56(2):180–4.
    1. Stern EB. Wrist extensor orthoses: dexterity and grip strength across four styles. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1991. January 1;45(1):42–9.
    1. Colbourn J, Heath N, Manary S, Pacifico D. Effectiveness of splinting for the treatment of trigger finger. Journal of hand therapy. 2008. December 31;21(4):336–43. doi:
    1. Silva AC, Jones A, Silva PG, Natour J. Effectiveness of a night-time hand positioning splint in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2008. October 5;40(9):749–54. doi:
    1. Michlovitz SL, Harris BA, Watkins MP. Therapy interventions for improving joint range of motion: a systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2004. June 30;17(2):118–31. doi:
    1. Carreira AC, Jones A, Natour J. Assessment of the effectiveness of a functional splint for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint on the dominant hand: a randomized controlled study. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2010. May 1;42(5):469–74. doi:
    1. De Boer IG, Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, Mertens BJ, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TP. The usage of functional wrist orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Disability and rehabilitation. 2008. January 1;30(4):286–95. doi:
    1. Alsancak S. Splint satisfaction in the treatment of traumatic radial nerve injuries. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2003. January 1;27(2):139–45. doi:
    1. Ghoseiri K, Bahramian H. User satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices and services of a single clinic. Disability and rehabilitation. 2012. July 1;34(15):1328–32. doi:
    1. Garber SL, Gregorio TL. Upper Extremity Assistive Devices: Assessment of Use by Spinal Cord–Injured Patients With Quadriplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1990. February 1;44(2):126–31.
    1. McGimpsey G, Bradford TC. Limb prosthetics services and devices Bioengineering Institute Center for Neuroprosthetics Worcester Polytechnic Institution; 2008.
    1. Kahle JT, Highsmith JM. Barriers Limiting the Geriatric Client From Accessing Orthotic Care. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2008. October 1;24(4):332–6.
    1. Highsmith MJ. Barriers to the Provision of Prosthetic Services in the Geriatric Population. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2008. October 1;24(4):325–31.
    1. Lehneis HR, inventor; New York University Filed July 8, assignee. Wrist driven arm support. United States patent US D230,895. 1974 Mar 19.
    1. Hoy DJ, Guilford AW. Functional ratchet orthotic system. ORTHOTICS AND PROSTHETICS. 1978. January 1;32(2):21–4.
    1. Abdallah IB, Bouteraa Y, Rekik C. Design and Development Of 3D Printed Myoelectric Robotic Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation. International Journal on Smart Sensing & Intelligent Systems. 2017. June 1;10(2).
    1. DiCicco M, Lucas L, Matsuoka Y. Comparison of control strategies for an EMG controlled orthotic exoskeleton for the hand. InRobotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on 2004 Apr 26 (Vol. 2, pp. 1622–1627).
    1. Saharan L, de Andrade MJ, Saleem W, Baughman RH, Tadesse Y. iGrab: hand orthosis powered by twisted and coiled polymer muscles. Smart Materials and Structures. 2017. September 22;26(10):105048.
    1. Coopers PW. 3D printing and the new shape of industrial manufacturing.
    1. Rayna T, Striukova L. From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016. January 31;102:214–24.
    1. Hoy MB. 3D printing: making things at the library. Medical reference services quarterly. 2013. January 1;32(1):93–9.
    1. Mavroidis C, Ranky RG, Sivak ML, Patritti BL, DiPisa J, Caddle A, et al. Patient specific ankle-foot orthoses using rapid prototyping. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2011. January 12;8(1):1.
    1. Wong MS. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) system for construction of spinal orthosis for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2011. January 1;27(1):74–9. doi:
    1. Pallari JH, Dalgarno KW, Woodburn J. Mass customization of foot orthoses for rheumatoid arthritis using selective laser sintering. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2010. July;57(7):1750–6. doi:
    1. Pallari JH, Dalgarno KW, Munguia J, Muraru L, Peeraer L, Telfer S, et al. Design and additive fabrication of foot and ankle-foot orthoses. InProceedings of the 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference, 9–11 August 2010, Austin, Texas, USA 2010 Aug.
    1. Dombroski CE, Balsdon ME, Froats A. The use of a low cost 3D scanning and printing tool in the manufacture of custom-made foot orthoses: a preliminary study. BMC research notes. 2014. July 10;7(1):443.
    1. Milusheva S, Tochev D, Stefanova L, Toshev Y. Virtual models and prototype of individual ankle foot orthosis. InISB XXth Congress-ASB 29th Annual Meeting 2005.
    1. Baronio G, Harran S, Signoroni A. A critical analysis of a hand orthosis reverse engineering and 3D printing process. Applied bionics and biomechanics. 2016. August 9;2016.
    1. Paterson AM, Bibb R, Campbell RI, Bingham G. Comparing additive manufacturing technologies for customised wrist splints. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2015. April 20;21(3):230–43.
    1. Kim H, Jeong S. Case study: Hybrid model for the customized wrist orthosis using 3D printing. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2015. December 1;29(12):5151–6.
    1. Buehler E, Branham S, Ali A, Chang JJ, Hofmann MK, Hurst A, et al. Sharing is caring: Assistive technology designs on thingiverse. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2015 Apr 18 (pp. 525–534). ACM.
    1. Hurst A, Kane S. Making making accessible. InProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children 2013 Jun 24 (pp. 635–638). ACM.
    1. Hurst A, Tobias J. Empowering individuals with do-it-yourself assistive technology. InThe proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility 2011 Oct 24 (pp. 11–18). ACM.
    1. Hofmann M, Harris J, Hudson SE, Mankoff J. Helping hands: Requirements for a prototyping methodology for upper-limb prosthetics users. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016 May 7 (pp. 1769–1780). ACM.
    1. Palousek D, Rosicky J, Koutny D, Stoklásek P, Navrat T. Pilot study of the wrist orthosis design process. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2014. January 14;20(1):27–32.
    1. Enabling the Future. Hand Devices. 2015. Available from: .
    1. Kuehn BM. Clinicians embrace 3D printers to solve unique clinical challenges. Jama. 2016. January 26;315(4):333–5. doi:
    1. Jacobs S, Schull J, White P, Lehrer R, Vishwakarma A, Bertucci A. e-NABLING education: Curricula and models for teaching students to print hands. InFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE 2016 Oct 12 (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
    1. Ates S, Leon B, Basteris A, Nijenhuis S, Nasr N, Sale P, et al. Technical evaluation of and clinical experiences with the SCRIPT passive wrist and hand orthosis. InHuman System Interactions (HSI), 2014 7th International Conference on 2014 Jun 16 (pp. 188–193). IEEE.
    1. Buchanan R. Human dignity and human rights: Thoughts on the principles of human-centered design. Design issues. 2001;17(3):35–9.
    1. Contreras-Vidal JL, Kilicarslan A, Huang HH, Grossman RG. Human-centered design of wearable neuroprostheses and exoskeletons. AI Magazine. 2015. December 31;36(4):12–22.
    1. Bazzano AN, Martin J, Hicks E, Faughnan M, Murphy L. Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts. PloS one. 2017. November 1;12(11):e0186744 doi:
    1. Georgia Tech Research Institute. Hand anthropometry. 2007. Available from: .
    1. Bennett CL, Cen K, Steele KM, Rosner DK. An intimate laboratory?: Prostheses as a tool for experimenting with identity and normalcy. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016 May 7 (pp. 1745–1756). ACM.
    1. Zuniga JM, Major MJ, Peck JL, Srivastava R, Pierce J, Stergiou N. Technical and Clinical Considerations for the Development of 3D Printed Upper-Limb Prostheses for Pediatric Patients.
    1. Zuniga JM, Peck J, Srivastava R, Katsavelis D, Carson A. An open source 3D-printed transitional hand prosthesis for children. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2016. July 1;28(3):103–8.
    1. Karat J. Evolving the scope of user-centered design. Communications of the ACM. 1997. July 1;40(7):33–8.
    1. Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & information technology. 2003. January 1;22(1):1–6.
    1. Almenara M, Cempini M, Gómez C, Cortese M, Martín C, Medina J, et al. Usability test of a hand exoskeleton for activities of daily living: an example of user-centered design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2017. January 2;12(1):84–96. doi:
    1. McKee P, Morgan L. Orthotics in rehabilitation: Splinting the hand and body FA Davis; 1998.
    1. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Materials & Design. 2014. June 30;58:242–6.
    1. Wittbrodt B, Pearce JM. The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Additive Manufacturing. 2015. October 31;8:110–6.
    1. Melenka GW, Schofield JS, Dawson MR, Carey JP. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy and material properties of the MakerBot 3D desktop printer. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2015. August 17;21(5):618–27.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere