Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Chances and Challenges

F Schwendicke, W Samek, J Krois, F Schwendicke, W Samek, J Krois

Abstract

The term "artificial intelligence" (AI) refers to the idea of machines being capable of performing human tasks. A subdomain of AI is machine learning (ML), which "learns" intrinsic statistical patterns in data to eventually cast predictions on unseen data. Deep learning is a ML technique using multi-layer mathematical operations for learning and inferring on complex data like imagery. This succinct narrative review describes the application, limitations and possible future of AI-based dental diagnostics, treatment planning, and conduct, for example, image analysis, prediction making, record keeping, as well as dental research and discovery. AI-based applications will streamline care, relieving the dental workforce from laborious routine tasks, increasing health at lower costs for a broader population, and eventually facilitate personalized, predictive, preventive, and participatory dentistry. However, AI solutions have not by large entered routine dental practice, mainly due to 1) limited data availability, accessibility, structure, and comprehensiveness, 2) lacking methodological rigor and standards in their development, 3) and practical questions around the value and usefulness of these solutions, but also ethics and responsibility. Any AI application in dentistry should demonstrate tangible value by, for example, improving access to and quality of care, increasing efficiency and safety of services, empowering and enabling patients, supporting medical research, or increasing sustainability. Individual privacy, rights, and autonomy need to be put front and center; a shift from centralized to distributed/federated learning may address this while improving scalability and robustness. Lastly, trustworthiness into, and generalizability of, dental AI solutions need to be guaranteed; the implementation of continuous human oversight and standards grounded in evidence-based dentistry should be expected. Methods to visualize, interpret, and explain the logic behind AI solutions will contribute ("explainable AI"). Dental education will need to accompany the introduction of clinical AI solutions by fostering digital literacy in the future dental workforce.

Keywords: decision-making; deep learning; dental; diagnostic systems; informatics; machine learning.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Natural and computer intelligence. Natural intelligence is characterized by perception, interpretation and biological response. In contrast, computer intelligence does so far not replace human responses, but largely supports human interpretation and action. Traditional software (1.0) as one pillar of computer intelligence is supported by rules-based expert systems; they take data and explicitly programmed logical rules to generate narrow, specialized outcomes, thereby outperforming humans in these tasks. Software 2.0 instead uses data and outcomes to infer the rules: In classical machine learning, the features are first engineered by human experts and then learned (e.g., regression modeling). In deep learning, relevant features are learned and mapped in one step, without human feature engineering; this allows to leverage even complex data structures like imagery or language. Modified after Kolossváry et al. (2019).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Milestones in the development of artificial intelligence (AI). AI refers to machines that are capable of performing tasks that are normally performed by humans. Machine learning (ML) involves the representation (learning) of intrinsic statistical patterns and structures in data, which allows for predictions for unseen data. “Deep Learning” is a form of machine learning in which multi-layered (deep) neural networks (NNs) are trained to learn features of complex data structures (e.g., image data or language). The history of AI is characterized by ups and downs; after numerous setbacks, optimism is greater today than ever before.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
More transparency through explainable AI (XAI). (A) Today’s AI models are often considered black boxes, because they take an input (e.g., an image) and provide a prediction (e.g., “rooster”) without saying how and why they arrived at it. (B) Recent XAI methods (Samek et al. 2019) redistribute the output back to input space and explain the prediction in terms of a “heatmap,” visualizing which input variables (e.g., pixels) were decisive for the prediction. (C) This allows to distinguish between meaningful and safe prediction strategies, for example, classifying rooster images by detecting the roster’s comb and wattles or classifying cat images by focusing on the cat’s ears and nose, and so-called Clever Hans predictors (Lapuschkin et al. 2019), for example, classifying horse images based on the presence of a copyright tag.

References

    1. Academy of Medical Sciences. 2018. Our data-driven future in healthcare [accessed 2020 Mar 9]. .
    1. Bubba TA, Kutyniok G, Lassas M, März M, Samek W, Siltanen S, Srinivasan V. 2019. Learning the invisible: a hybrid deep learning-shearlet framework for limited angle computed tomography. Inverse Probl. 35(6):064002. doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ab10ca.
    1. El Naqa I, Ruan D, Valdes G, Dekker A, McNutt T, Ge Y, Wu QJ, Oh JH, Thor M, Smith W, et al. 2018. Machine learning and modeling: data, validation, communication challenges. Med Phys. 45(10):e834–e840.
    1. England JR, Cheng PM. 2019. Artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: a guide for authors and reviewers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 212(3):513–519.
    1. European Commission. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI [accessed 2020 Mar 9]. .
    1. Gianfrancesco MA, Tamang S, Yazdany J, Schmajuk G. 2018. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern Med. 178(11):1544–1547.
    1. Hornik K. 1991. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 4(2):251–257.
    1. Israni ST, Verghese A. 2019. Humanizing artificial intelligence. JAMA. 321(1):29–30.
    1. Kolossváry M, De Cecco CN, Feuchtner G, Maurovich-Horvat P. 2019. Advanced atherosclerosis imaging by CT: radiomics, machine learning and deep learning. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 13(5):274–280.
    1. Lapuschkin S, Wäldchen S, Binder A, Montavon G, Samek W, Müller K-R. 2019. Unmasking Clever Hans predictors and assessing what machines really learn. Nat Commun. 10(1):1096.
    1. Maddox TM, Rumsfeld JS, Payne PRO. 2019. Questions for artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA. 321(1):31–32.
    1. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Ransohoff DF, Collins GS. 2015. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 162(1):W1–73.
    1. Naylor CD. 2018. On the prospects for a (deep) learning health care system. JAMA. 320(11):1099–1100.
    1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2019. U.S. leadership in AI: a plan for federal engagement in developing technical standards and related tools [accessed 2020 Mar 9]. .
    1. Osman A, Samek W. 2019. DRAU: dual recurrent attention units for visual question answering. Comput Vis Image Underst. 185:24–30.
    1. Samek W, Montavon G, Vedaldi A, Hansen L, Müller K. 2019. Explainable AI: interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning. Berlin: Springer.
    1. Sattler F, Wiedemann S, Müller K, Samek W. 2019. Robust and communication-efficient federated learning from non-i.i.d. data. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst [epub ahead of print 01 Nov 2019] in press. . DOI:10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944481
    1. Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, Krois J. 2019. Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: a scoping review. J Dent. 91:103226.
    1. Strubell E, Ganesh A, McCallum A. 2019. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 3645–3650.
    1. The Topol Review. 2019. The Topol review: preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future [accessed 2020 Mar 9]. .
    1. Topol E. 2019. Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. New York: Basic Books.
    1. Walsh T. 2018. Fuzzy gold standards: approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard. J Dent. 74 Suppl 1:S47–S49.
    1. Watt RG, Daly B, Allison P, Macpherson LMD, Venturelli R, Listl S, Weyant RJ, Mathur MR, Guarnizo-Herreno CC, Celeste RK, et al. 2019. Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. Lancet. 394(10194):261–272.
    1. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, et al. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 6(1):6.
    1. Wu J, Liu X, Zhang X, He Z, Lv P. 2018. Master clinical medical knowledge at certificated-doctor-level with deep learning model. Nat Commun. 9(1):4352.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere