Feasibility of Administering High-Dose (131) I-MIBG Therapy to Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma Without Lead-Lined Rooms

Bae P Chu, Christopher Horan, Ellen Basu, Lawrence Dauer, Matthew Williamson, Jorge A Carrasquillo, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Shakeel Modak, Bae P Chu, Christopher Horan, Ellen Basu, Lawrence Dauer, Matthew Williamson, Jorge A Carrasquillo, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Shakeel Modak

Abstract

Background: Although (131) I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131) I-MIBG) therapy is increasingly used for children with high-risk neuroblastoma, a paucity of lead-lined rooms limits its wider use. We implemented radiation safety procedures to comply with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene regulations for therapeutic radioisotopes and administered (131) I-MIBG using rolling lead shields.

Procedure: Patients received 0.67 GBq (18 mCi)/kg/dose (131) I-MIBG on an IRB-approved protocol (NCT00107289). Radiation safety procedures included private room with installation of rolling lead shields to maintain area dose rates ≤0.02 mSv/hr outside the room, patient isolation until dose rate <0.07 mSv/hr at 1 m, and retention of a urinary catheter with collection of urine in lead boxes. Parents were permitted in the patient's room behind lead shields, trained in radiation safety principles, and given real-time radiation monitors.

Results: Records on 16 (131) I-MIBG infusions among 10 patients (age 2-11 years) were reviewed. Mean ± standard deviation (131) I-MIBG administered was 17.67 ± 11.14 (range: 6.11-40.59) GBq. Mean maximum dose rates outside treatment rooms were 0.013 ± 0.008 mSv/hr. Median time-to-discharge was 3 days post-(131) I-MIBG. Exposure of medical staff and parents was below regulatory limits. Cumulative whole-body dose received by the physician, nurse, and radiation safety officer during treatment was 0.098 ± 0.058, 0.056 ± 0.045, 0.055 ± 0.050 mSv, respectively. Cumulative exposure to parents was 0.978 ± 0.579 mSv. Estimated annual radiation exposure for inpatient nurses was 0.096 ± 0.034 mSv/nurse. Thyroid bioassay scans on all medical personnel showed less than detectable activity. Contamination surveys were <200 dpm/100 cm(2) .

Conclusions: The use of rolling lead shields and implementation of specific radiation safety procedures allows administration of high-dose (131) I-MIBG and may broaden its use without dedicated lead-lined rooms.

Keywords: MIBG therapy; neuroblastoma; radiation exposure; radiation safety.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Floor plan and diagram of patient room M501 for planned dose >18.5GBq (500mCi) and adjacent areas. Locations of patient bed, bathroom, position of rolling shields, and area for caregivers are noted.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contamination controls: (A) absorbent landing pad (Bruin Herculite, Atlantic Nuclear) from the patient bed to the exit door, (B) plastic wrap to cover television remote control and telephone, and (C) absorbent pads to cover the bathroom sink and under the toilet seat
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shielding controls (A) lead boxes for urine collection bags; and (B) rolling lead shields

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere