Use of a Real-Time Locating System for Contact Tracing of Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic at an Infectious Disease Center in Singapore: Validation Study

Hanley J Ho, Zoe Xiaozhu Zhang, Zhilian Huang, Aung Hein Aung, Wei-Yen Lim, Angela Chow, Hanley J Ho, Zoe Xiaozhu Zhang, Zhilian Huang, Aung Hein Aung, Wei-Yen Lim, Angela Chow

Abstract

Background: In early 2020, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) emerged and spread by community and nosocomial transmission. Effective contact tracing of potentially exposed health care workers is crucial for the prevention and control of infectious disease outbreaks in the health care setting.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic through the real-time locating system (RTLS) and review of the electronic medical record (EMR) at the designated hospital for COVID-19 response in Singapore.

Methods: Over a 2-day study period, all admitted patients with COVID-19, their ward locations, and the health care workers rostered to each ward were identified to determine the total number of potential contacts between patients with COVID-19 and health care workers. The numbers of staff-patient contacts determined by EMR reviews, RTLS-based contact tracing, and a combination of both methods were evaluated. The use of EMR-based and RTLS-based contact tracing methods was further validated by comparing their sensitivity and specificity against self-reported staff-patient contacts by health care workers.

Results: Of 796 potential staff-patient contacts (between 17 patients and 162 staff members), 104 (13.1%) were identified by both the RTLS and EMR, 54 (6.8%) by the RTLS alone, and 99 (12.4%) by the EMR alone; 539 (67.7%) were not identified through either method. Compared to self-reported contacts, EMR reviews had a sensitivity of 47.2% and a specificity of 77.9%, while the RTLS had a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 87.7%. The highest sensitivity was obtained by including all contacts identified by either the RTLS or the EMR (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 73.4%).

Conclusions: RTLS-based contact tracing showed higher sensitivity and specificity than EMR review. Integration of both methods provided the best performance for rapid contact tracing, although technical adjustments to the RTLS and increasing user compliance with wearing of RTLS tags remain necessary.

Keywords: COVID-19; RFID; contact tracing; electronic medical records; health care workers; infectious disease; real-time locating systems.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Hanley J Ho, Zoe Xiaozhu Zhang, Zhilian Huang, Aung Hein Aung, Wei-Yen Lim, Angela Chow. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 26.05.2020.

References

    1. Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Qin Q. Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J Med Virol. 2020 Mar 05;:568–576. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25748.
    1. World Health Organization. 2017. May 09, [2020-03-17]. Contact tracing
    1. Saurabh S, Prateek S. Role of contact tracing in containing the 2014 Ebola outbreak: a review. Afr Health Sci. 2017 Mar;17(1):225–236. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i1.28.
    1. Kuster SP, Shah PS, Coleman BL, Lam P, Tong A, Wormsbecker A, McGeer A. Incidence of influenza in healthy adults and healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026239.
    1. Lowery-North DW, Hertzberg VS, Elon L, Cotsonis G, Hilton SA, Vaughns CF, Hill E, Shrestha A, Jo A, Adams N. Measuring social contacts in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070854.
    1. Jiang L, Ng HL, Ho HJ, Leo YS, Prem K, Cook AR, Chen MI. Contacts of healthcare workers, patients and visitors in general wards in Singapore. Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Sep 08;145(14):3085–3095. doi: 10.1017/s0950268817002035.
    1. Drumright L, Holmes A. Monitoring major illness in health care workers and hospital staff. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Aug 01;53(3):284–6. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir384.
    1. Jones TL, Schlegel C. Can real time location system technology (RTLS) provide useful estimates of time use by nursing personnel? Res Nurs Health. 2014 Feb;37(1):75–84. doi: 10.1002/nur.21578.
    1. Farrahi K, Emonet R, Cebrian M. Epidemic contact tracing via communication traces. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e95133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095133.
    1. Foxwell AR, Roberts Leslee, Lokuge Kamalini, Kelly Paul M. Transmission of influenza on international flights, may 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;17(7):1188–94. doi: 10.3201/eid1707.101135. doi: 10.3201/eid1707.101135.
    1. Alamo ST, Wagner GJ, Sunday P, Wanyenze RK, Ouma J, Kamya M, Colebunders R, Wabwire-Mangen F. Electronic medical records and same day patient tracing improves clinic efficiency and adherence to appointments in a community based HIV/AIDS care program, in Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):368–74. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9996-9.
    1. Hellmich TR, Clements CM, El-Sherif N, Pasupathy KS, Nestler DM, Boggust A, Ernste VK, Marisamy G, Koenig KR, Hallbeck MS. Contact tracing with a real-time location system: A case study of increasing relative effectiveness in an emergency department. Am J Infect Control. 2017 Dec 01;45(12):1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.014.
    1. Yao W, Chu C, Li Z. The adoption and implementation of RFID technologies in healthcare: a literature review. J Med Syst. 2012 Dec;36(6):3507–25. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9789-8.
    1. Ebrahimzadeh F, Nabovati E, Hasibian MR, Eslami S. Evaluation of the Effects of Radio-Frequency Identification Technology on Patient Tracking in Hospitals: A Systematic Review. J Patient Saf. 2017 Dec 15;:Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000446.
    1. Bowen ME, Wingrave CA, Klanchar A, Craighead J. Tracking technology: lessons learned in two health care sites. Technol Health Care. 2013;21(3):191–7. doi: 10.3233/THC-130738.
    1. Camacho-Cogollo J, Bonet I, Iadanza E. Chapter 4 - RFID technology in health care. In: Iadanza E, editor. Clinical Engineering Handbook. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2019. Dec 04, pp. A–41.
    1. Wong JEL, Leo YS, Tan CC. COVID-19 in Singapore-Current Experience: Critical Global Issues That Require Attention and Action. JAMA. 2020 Feb 20;:1243–1244. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2467.
    1. Lucet J, Laouenan C, Chelius G, Veziris N, Lepelletier D, Friggeri A, Abiteboul D, Bouvet E, Mentre F, Fleury E. Electronic sensors for assessing interactions between healthcare workers and patients under airborne precautions. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037893.
    1. Chang Y, Syed-Abdul S, Tsai C, Li Y. A novel method for inferring RFID tag reader recordings into clinical events. Int J Med Inform. 2011 Dec;80(12):872–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.006.
    1. Park Y, Lee C, Kim KM, Kim SW, Lee K, Ahn J, Ki M. The first case of the 2015 Korean Middle East Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. Epidemiol Health. 2015;37:e2015049. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2015049. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2015049.
    1. Ki HK, Han SK, Son JS, Park SO. Risk of transmission via medical employees and importance of routine infection-prevention policy in a nosocomial outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a descriptive analysis from a tertiary care hospital in South Korea. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0940-5.
    1. Isella L, Romano M, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Colizza V, Van den Broeck W, Gesualdo F, Pandolfi E, Ravà L, Rizzo C, Tozzi AE. Close encounters in a pediatric ward: measuring face-to-face proximity and mixing patterns with wearable sensors. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017144.
    1. Arunachalam S, Asan O, Nestler D, Heaton H, Hellmich T, Wutthisirisart P, Marisamy G, Pasupathy KS, Sir MY. Patient-Care Team Contact Patterns Impact Treatment Length of Stay in the Emergency Department. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 23-27 July 2019; Berlin, Germany. 2019. Jul, pp. 345–348.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

3
Abonnere