Self-reported and objectively measured physical activity levels among Hispanic/Latino adults with type 2 diabetes

Wendy Bevier, Namino Glantz, Charis Hoppe, Jessikah Morales Glass, Arianna Larez, Kong Chen, David Kerr, Wendy Bevier, Namino Glantz, Charis Hoppe, Jessikah Morales Glass, Arianna Larez, Kong Chen, David Kerr

Abstract

Objective: In the USA, minority populations face a disproportionate burden from type 2 diabetes (T2D), in whom physical activity (PA) is recommended. The aim of this study was to determine levels of PA among a community of free-living Hispanic/Latino adults with T2D using a research accelerometer, a consumer device and a pictogram self-assessment questionnaire.

Research design and methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study. Participants (57 women and 31 men, body mass index (kg/m2) 32.2±7.9 and 29.9±4.5, waist circumference 97.1±30.1 and 93.7±33.0 cm and hemoglobin A1c 8.0±2.0 and 8.1%±1.8%, respectively) wore an ActiGraph (AG) on the hip and a Fitbit (FB) on the wrist for 1 week to estimate daily steps and energy expenditure (EE). Participants reported type and intensity of PA using English-language or Spanish-language pictograms and a 10-point Likert scale (1='not active' to 10='very, very active').

Results: Steps per day were not normally distributed; AG median steps/weekday (Monday-Friday) was 6990 (range 1091-25 884) compared with 9329 (288-31 669) using FB (p≤0.01). Both devices recorded significantly more steps on weekdays versus weekends (p≤0.05). EE was also higher during the week. AG and FB were highly correlated to each other (p<0.01). Men were more active than women and maintained their PA throughout the week, whereas women decreased theirs on weekends. Spanish-language pictograms were preferred and self-reported PA matched objective assessments by both devices. Participants perceived themselves to be active (7.1±2.0) due to work.

Conclusions: Both objectively measured and self-reported levels of PA in Hispanic/Latino adults with T2D challenge the assumption that lack of PA may be commonplace for this group. AG and FB are different in their measurement of PA but are significantly correlated. New strategies, including use of pictograms, for interventions need to be considered if further increases or changes in PA are to be used as T2D therapy.

Trial registration number: NCT03736486.

Keywords: Hispanic; exercise; physical activity and health; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fitbit steps per day vs ActiGraph steps per day.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of step counts using Fitbit and ActiGraph over 7 days. Data are shown as median values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Physical activity assessed by ActiGraph and showing the median number of steps per day and the associated activity pictograms. *P≤0.05 differences between ‘sedentary rest’ and ‘housework and manual work’ for 06:00–12:00 hours, between ‘sedentary rest’ and ‘manual work’ for 12:00–18:00 hours, between ‘sedentary rest’ and ‘manual work and exercise not work’ for 18:00–24:00 hours. †P≤0.05 difference between ‘manual work’ and ‘exercise not work’.

References

    1. National center for health statistics Health, United States, 2016: with Chartbook on long-term trends in health. Hyattsville, MD, 2017.
    1. Golden SH, Brown A, Cauley JA, et al. . Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors--an Endocrine Society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E1579–639. 10.1210/jc.2012-2043
    1. American Diabetes Association 5. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42:S46–60. 10.2337/dc19-S005
    1. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, et al. . Physical Activity/Exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2065–79. 10.2337/dc16-1728
    1. Bazargan-Hejazi S, Arroyo JS, Hsia S, et al. . A racial comparison of differences between self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among US adults with diabetes. Ethn Dis 2017;27:403–10. 10.18865/ed.27.4.403
    1. Kaushal N. Adversities of acculturation? prevalence of obesity among immigrants. Health Econ 2009;18:291–303. 10.1002/hec.1368
    1. Woolcott OO, Bergman RN, mass Rfat. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage ─ a cross-sectional study in American adult individuals. Sci Rep 2018;8:10980 10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
    1. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011;14:411–6. 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Camhi SM, Troiano RP. A catalog of rules, variables, and definitions applied to accelerometer data in the National health and nutrition examination survey, 2003-2006. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E113 10.5888/pcd9.110332
    1. Evenson KR, Sotres-Alvarez D, Deng YU, et al. . Accelerometer adherence and performance in a cohort study of US Hispanic adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:725–34. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000478
    1. Troiano RP. Large-Scale applications of accelerometers: new frontiers and new questions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:1501 10.1097/mss.0b013e318150d42e
    1. Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, et al. . A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;51:241–7. 10.1093/ajcn/51.2.241
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, et al. . Revisiting "how many steps are enough?". Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:S537–43. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133
    1. Imboden MT, Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, et al. . Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Br J Sports Med 2018;52:844–50. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096990
    1. Alharbi M, Bauman A, Neubeck L, et al. . Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016;23:1476–85. 10.1177/2047487316634883
    1. Chu AHY, Ng SHX, Paknezhad M, et al. . Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. PLoS One 2017;12:e0172535 10.1371/journal.pone.0172535
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA, Macera CA, et al. . Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:1567–73. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000139806.53824.2E
    1. Merchant G, Buelna C, Castañeda SF, et al. . Accelerometer-measured sedentary time among Hispanic adults: results from the Hispanic community health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). Prev Med Rep 2015;2:845–53. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.019
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough? preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 2004;34:1–8. 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001
    1. Kraus WE, Janz KF, Powell KE, et al. . Daily step counts for measuring physical activity exposure and its relation to health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019;51:1206–12. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001932
    1. Shaw PA, McMurray R, Butte N, et al. . Calibration of activity-related energy expenditure in the Hispanic community health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL). J Sci Med Sport 2019;22:300–6. 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.021
    1. Vega-López S, Chavez A, Farr KJ, et al. . Validity and reliability of two brief physical activity questionnaires among Spanish-speaking individuals of Mexican descent. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:29 10.1186/1756-0500-7-29
    1. Velasco-Mondragon E, Jimenez A, Palladino-Davis AG, et al. . Hispanic health in the USA: a scoping review of the literature. Public Health Rev 2016;37:31 10.1186/s40985-016-0043-2
    1. Skender S, Ose J, Chang-Claude J, et al. . Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires - a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2016;16:515 10.1186/s12889-016-3172-0
    1. Kapteyn A, Banks J, Hamer M, et al. . What they say and what they do: comparing physical activity across the USA, England and the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 2018;72:471–6. 10.1136/jech-2017-209703
    1. Joseph JJ, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Golden SH, et al. . Physical activity, sedentary behaviors and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2016;4:e000185 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000185
    1. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, et al. . Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001335 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335
    1. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, et al. . Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:959–67. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533
    1. van Dijk J-W, Venema M, van Mechelen W, et al. . Effect of moderate-intensity exercise versus activities of daily living on 24-hour blood glucose homeostasis in male patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3448–53. 10.2337/dc12-2620
    1. van Dijk J-W, van Loon LJC. Exercise strategies to optimize glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a continuing glucose monitoring perspective. Diabetes Spectr 2015;28:24–31. 10.2337/diaspect.28.1.24
    1. Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M, et al. . Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Intern Med 2019. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0899. [Epub ahead of print: 29 May 2019].
    1. King AC, Whitt-Glover MC, Marquez DX, et al. . Physical activity promotion: highlights from the 2018 physical activity guidelines Advisory Committee systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019;51:1340–53. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945
    1. Patel MS, Volpp KG, Rosin R, et al. . A randomized, controlled trial of Lottery-Based financial incentives to increase physical activity among overweight and obese adults. Am J Health Promot 2018;32:1568–75. 10.1177/0890117118758932
    1. Reid RER, Insogna JA, Carver TE, et al. . Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. J Sci Med Sport 2017;20:578–82. 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.015
    1. Chomistek AK, Yuan C, Matthews CE, et al. . Physical activity assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and doubly labeled water. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017;49:1935–44. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001299
    1. Shcherbina A, Mattsson CM, Waggott D, et al. . Accuracy in Wrist-Worn, Sensor-Based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J Pers Med 2017;7 10.3390/jpm7020003. [Epub ahead of print: 24 May 2017].
    1. Layne CS, Parker NH, Soltero EG, et al. . Are physical activity studies in Hispanics meeting reporting guidelines for continuous monitoring technology? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2015;15:917 10.1186/s12889-015-2266-4
    1. Wang JB, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Natarajan L, et al. . Wearable Sensor/Device (Fitbit one) and SMS Text-Messaging prompts to increase physical activity in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health 2015;21:782–92. 10.1089/tmj.2014.0176
    1. Cadmus-Bertram LA, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, et al. . Randomized trial of a Fitbit-Based physical activity intervention for women. Am J Prev Med 2015;49:414–8. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.020
    1. Mercer K, Li M, Giangregorio L, et al. . Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity Trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016;4:e40 10.2196/mhealth.4461

Source: PubMed

3
Abonnere