Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction the REFINE study
Derek V Exner, Katherine M Kavanagh, Michael P Slawnych, L Brent Mitchell, Darlene Ramadan, Sandeep G Aggarwal, Catherine Noullett, Allie Van Schaik, Ryan T Mitchell, Mariko A Shibata, Sajad Gulamhussein, James McMeekin, Wayne Tymchak, Gregory Schnell, Anne M Gillis, Robert S Sheldon, Gordon H Fick, Henry J Duff, REFINE Investigators, Derek V Exner, Katherine M Kavanagh, Michael P Slawnych, L Brent Mitchell, Darlene Ramadan, Sandeep G Aggarwal, Catherine Noullett, Allie Van Schaik, Ryan T Mitchell, Mariko A Shibata, Sajad Gulamhussein, James McMeekin, Wayne Tymchak, Gregory Schnell, Anne M Gillis, Robert S Sheldon, Gordon H Fick, Henry J Duff, REFINE Investigators
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine whether combined assessment of autonomic tone plus cardiac electrical substrate identifies most patients at risk of serious events after myocardial infarction (MI) and to compare assessment at 2 to 4 weeks versus 10 to 14 weeks after MI.
Background: Methods to identify most patients at risk of serious events after MI are required.
Methods: Patients (n = 322) with an ejection fraction (EF) <0.50 in the initial week after MI were followed up for a median of 47 months. Serial assessment of autonomic tone, including heart rate turbulence (HRT), electrical substrate, including T-wave alternans (TWA), and EF was performed, interpreted blinded, and categorized using pre-specified cut-points where available. The primary outcome was cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest. All-cause mortality and fatal or nonfatal cardiac arrest were secondary outcomes.
Results: Mean EF significantly increased over the initial 8 weeks after MI. Testing 2 to 4 weeks after MI did not reliably identify patients at risk, whereas testing at 10 to 14 weeks did. The 20% of patients with impaired HRT, abnormal exercise TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks post-MI had a 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 11.3, p < 0.001) higher adjusted risk of the primary outcome. This combination identified 52% of those at risk, with good positive (23%; 95% CI 17% to 26%) and negative (95%; 95% CI 93% to 97%) accuracy. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: Impaired HRT, abnormal TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI reliably identify patients at risk of serious events. (Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00399503?order=1; NCT00399503).
Source: PubMed